About: Isaac Golden
- Website
- Profile
- Isaac Golden PhD, DHom, ND. Isaac has been teaching homoeopathy for 15 years. He is founder and Director of the Australasian College of Hahnemannian Homoeopathy and Faculty Head of Homoeopathy at the Melbourne College of Natural Medicine He is the author of eight books on Homoeopathy. Isaac Golden is a world authority on homoeoprophylaxis and has done the largest long-term study of parents using such a program. Dr. Isaac Golden may be contacted at either; Postal: P.O. Box 695 , Gisborne, 3437. Phone/Fax: (03) 5427 0880. E-mail: admin@homstudy.net
Posts by Isaac Golden:
-
-
Isaac Golden
Isaac Golden has been a homoeopathic practitioner since 1984. Prior to that his career was in financial accounting and taxation following an Honours degree in Economics in 1972. Isaac was President of the Victorian branch of the Australian Homoeopathic Association – Australia’s largest national organization of professional homoeopaths – from... -
Endeavour College of Natural Health – A Commitment to Homeopathy
The Endeavour College of Natural Health (ECNH) is the largest provider of education in natural health in the Southern Hemisphere, with 6 campuses in 5 States of Australia, and thousands of students studying not only homeopathy but naturopathy, herbal medicine, nutrition, musculoskeletal therapy, acupuncture and traditional Chinese medicine, remedial therapy,... -
Homoeoprophylaxis – a further reply to Rudi Verspoor and George Vithoulkas
Comment on Rudi Verspoor’s Contribution I appreciate Rudi Verspoor’s response in the continuing HP discussion. He makes an interesting differentiation between homoprophylaxis (using the nosode), and homeoprophylaxis (using the genus epidemicus). I think it will be a difficult job gaining acceptance of the different terms, given that homoeopathy/homeopathy is spelt... -
Some Questions Regarding Verspoors Terminology
I am writing to ask Rudi some questions following his excellent contributions over the last 4 months concerning the true meaning of Hahnemann’s terminology. I hope that some readers will share at least a few of my questions, as Rudi’s ideas are challenging and I found that I needed to... -
Reply to Rudi Verspoor
I appreciate Rudi Verspoor joining the great HP debate. We have known each other via publications and internet for many years, and I greatly respect his (at times unpopular) scholarship regarding Hahnemann’s writings. I have carefully read Rudi’s four contributions over the May to August issues concerning terminology, and Hahnemann’s... -
Homoeoprophylaxis Revisited
A Third Reply to George Vithoulkas It is a pleasure to see the discussion regarding the use of homoeopathic immunization or homoeoprophylaxis (HP) provoking interest among readers. I sincerely believe that as more data is made available concerning its safety and efficacy, as well as the classical homoeopathic principles upon... -
A Reply to George Vithoulkas
It is not every day that one is criticised by the guru of modern classical homoeopathy, George Vithoulkas, so I have tried to choose my words carefully and respectfully. He deserves nothing less for the great work developing homoeopathy that he has undertaken over many years. But I also believe... -
A Second Reply to George Vithoulkas
I appreciate GV’s approach to this debate. I will attempt to address his response with the following four points. 1. George said – “The main question should be: Do we have a way of protecting people from epidemic diseases in a reliable way to come out publicly and declare to... -
The Latest Research Into The Effectiveness and Safety of Homeoprophylaxis
Introduction I have been collecting data on the safety and effectiveness of long-term homeoprophylaxis (HP) since 1985, when I first developed a 5 year program for the long-term prevention of targeted infectious diseases. The Status Sheet accompanying my current program is shown in Figure 1, and outlines the suggested main...
