| This book by Grant Bentley is an effort to elaborate his work
on finding the miasm of a patient through homeopathic facial analysis.
Every homeopath who has read Allen, Roberts, Kent, Ortega etc is
aquatinted with the broad physical and mental profiles associated
with each miasm. But Grant has gone one step ahead and has documented
the finer differences in the facial features associated with each
miasm. The work started by collecting cured cases of a well known
anti-miasmatic remedy like Sulphur, Mercurius or Thuja and then
analyzing the facial features of the patients to find the common
characteristics. After having ascertained the basic characters in
this way, Grant and Louise Barton have fine-tuned the system through
clinical testing.
This book outlines the history of miasms as well as the current
understanding and controversies relate to the concept of miasm.
It then goes on to explain Grant's understanding of miasm through
general discussion, profile of each miasm and related cases. There
are a couple of key points in Grant's understanding of miasms
that are worth pointing out -
1. There is only one dominant miasm in any person.
2. There are only 7 miasms, five of which are known and named (Psora,
Sycosis, Syphilis, Tubercular and Cancer) and two are still unknown
(Syco-Psora and Syco-Syphilis).
3. Instead of giving a name to the miasms and to remove the confusion
of Miasms being related to the actual disease, Grant has tried to
evolve a colour code for miasms which is as follows: Psora - Yellow,
Sycosis - Red, Syphilis - Blue, Tubercular - Green, Syco-Psora -
Orange, Syco-Syphilis - Purple and Cancer - Brown.

When I started reading the book, initially I had difficulty
in relating to the colour code. Every time a colour got mentioned
and I would need to flip the page to find out which color is related
with which miasm. The concept of name of colors instead of miasms,
takes time to sink in. And even after reading the whole book and
becoming acquainted with the concept, the thought process was not
straight. It was not possible to unlearn what we are used to. Whenever
I thought about a miasm, the name would pop up - 'ok, this patient
belongs to Syphilis miasm -->Syphilis means 'blue'-->blue
is related with following facial characters'. So the reasoning was
not starlight and I am not sure if the colours would ever be able
to replace the names of the miasms.
There are some other problem areas with this book.
The author has used to concept of colour coding at many places even
before the full explanation of various colours is given.
The colours should not be used to describe anything until the book
presents a full understanding of each individual colour (miasm).
It makes it a bit confusing.
Some of the 'spiritual' reasoning could also have
been avoided like:
"The number of miasms
in this model totals seven - hardly surprising considering the
number's vibrational flavour. It is represented by the seven heavens,
the amount of colours in the rainbow, seven chakras in the body,
the number of notes on a musical scale and in a mandala; seven
is the number of universal harmony."
The author has related Miasms with genetic transmission:
"Genetic inheritance
and the miasms are interchangeable versions of one another. The
study of miasms is the study of homeopathic genetics. But homeopathic
genetics is not the same as its allopathic counterpart; homeopathic
genetics is the study of psychological and biological trends.
A person's dominant miasm
does not change after the administration of the correct remedy,
but the influence of that miasm is certainly lessened."
But at the same time, he also relates it with our
Karma -
"What is the difference
between miasms and karma? The short answer is, there is no difference
at all. Miasmatic knowledge is nothing more than the age-old laws
of karma with a medicinal application.”
For majority of people, such crossover between science
and spirituality is confusing and it could have been avoided in
a text which is trying to give a scientific clinical way for applying
miasms. But every theoretical work on miasms is bound to have many
points of contentions and confusions. If you can filter these and
focus on the clinical application, this book gives you a good tool
for clinical application of miasms. If Grant's work gets verified
universally, it will help simplify the use of miasms in clinical
practice.
Overall, I feel the content of the book is good and
useful but it could have been edited better. If you want to learn
about Homeopathic Facial Analysis, then this book is going to be
your primary guide. |