Some time ago, a lovely lady in her early 40's was sent
to see me by her doctor as a last resort. The doctor had no idea
what the problem was or what to prescribe for her. She had
already been to the neurologist, the endocrinologist, the oncologist
and every “ologist” the doctor could think of. They could
find nothing, so several months later and many hundreds of dollars
lighter, she was still no closer to a diagnosis or relief from her
symptoms. She was declared "the most difficult case we have
ever seen."
So, here she was in my office. My heart sank into the pit of my
stomach and I tried to sound confident as I asked her to tell me
her story.
Her problem was that she was having 'blackouts' which
had become so frequent that she could not go out alone or drive
the car. The first blackout had occurred when she was
in a shopping mall with a friend. She suddenly felt "a
jerk in my head like an electric shock." It was
not painful, just like a jerk or a jolt. Immediately, after this,
she fainted and fell to the floor. When she 'came to' a short time
later, she was anxious and needed reassurance from her friend that
she was alright. The first thing she did then was to ring her husband
to come for her.
She was fine for a week after this episode until it happened
a second time, and again a third time a few days later. The frequency
gradually increased until she was having several episodes a day.
Of course, by now, she was too afraid to leave the house and would
not be left alone. When I asked her how she felt after she 'came
to' from each episode, she said "I just need someone
there with me to reassure me that I am alright."
When I asked her what was the worst thing about this problem, she
said "I have a really good social life but it means
that I can't go out and meet up with my friends."
I took her health history and family history - all very clear,
nothing much at all.
I asked her what had been going on in her life leading up to
the onset of the blackouts. She told me that she and her husband
had started up a business which had been going very well and they
wanted to open a new branch. A friend of theirs had fallen on hard
times and so her husband had employed the friend as the
new branch manager. However, things had not worked out well. The
friend would not follow instructions, had become very difficult,
it was costing them money and so they asked him to leave. He
refused, took them to Court and the case was currently still in
progress. It had all become very nasty on a personal level.
When I asked her what was the most upsetting aspect of this
situation for her, she said "He and his wife were very good
friends of ours but, after all this is over, we will have lost
them as our friends."
I now knew what the remedy was. This case, which was the most
difficult one the -ologists had ever seen, was one of
the simplest homeopathic cases I ever had to deal with.
I took two aspects of the case into consideration:-
First, she had used the words 'a jerk or a jolt, like
an electric shock' to describe the sensation in her head before
she fainted. Secondly, when asked to define the worst thing about
both her physical problem and the problem with the court case, her main
concern was being separated from or losing friends.
It was a clear case of Phosphorus. I did a word search in Radar on
the word 'electric' and looked up three rubrics:
- Head, shocks electric-like
- Head,
electric current sensation
-
Generalities, shock electric-like
All had Phosphorus listed in bold.
I gave her one dose of Phosphorus 200c and asked her to ring
me in a week. I asked her to write down how many episodes
she had each day. I was anticipating a good response; the remedy
was clear, the symptoms had only come on relatively recently, she
had good vitality and a very uncompromised medical and family history.
She rang me the following Friday as requested. Over the week,
the number of episodes had reduced from five to one per day. I asked
her to take one more dose and ring me in another week.
She didn't ring me.
Two weeks later, I was very concerned to know how she was going
so I rang her. She answered me on her mobile but said that
she couldn't talk to me just then as she was driving on the motorway, heading
for the airport to pick up a friend. "Hmmmm"
I thought, "interesting ........" She
rang me back and just started to chat so I had to ask her "How
about the blackouts?" She stopped and thought - a positive
sign that the symptoms are not now top in her mind. After a pause,
she replied, "I think I might have had a little one a few
days ago." I was happy, convinced that my client was well
on the way to 'cure.'
This case has caused me to muse over what constitutes
a difficult case for the homeopath as compared to the doctor.
For each homeopath, it will probably vary, but for all
of us, it is very different from the sort of case that the -ologist
would regard as difficult. The case above does not fit into
any of the regular diagnostic boxes of orthodox medicine. Without
a credible diagnosis, no treatment can be decided upon.
Individuality stumps the medics and it is not easily dealt
with. However, a case like this falls easily into the homeopath's
lap. A couple of unusual symptoms is often all we need, and
the stranger the better.
Since treating this case, I have 'tried it out' on every
class from years one to four that I have taught. Without exception, all
the students have come up with the correct remedy in a very
short time. My heart leaps now when I hear a new client
tell me that the doctor said they "are a very difficult
case." On the other hand, the cases I am least fond
of are the 'simple' ones such as the hayfever with a clear runny
nose and itchy eyes or the uncomplicated cough with no
distinguishing characteristics or modalities, ie. the 'simple'
cases that the doctor loves. Give me the cases that have stumped
the -ologists any day, you know, the 'difficult' ones that we can
solve 'simply.'
-------------------------------------------------
Julie Andrews
BMus,
ND, Dip
Hom, ADH, RCHom
College Dean
Bay
of Plenty College of Homeopathy
New Zealand
|