Dear Readers,
In 1998, the National Agency of Medicines in France, prohibited
manufacturing, sale, import, or even possession of nosodes (human
biologicals) and potencies less than 4Ch of animal sourced remedies,
including Calcarea carbonica and Sepia. Since then many other medicines
have been banned or restricted in EU, US and Canada. In our guest
editorial this month, Dr. Gabrielle Traub shares that even the sale
of Syzigium-jamb has been restricted. This month we pick up this
special issue of regulating the sale of homeopathy medicines.
The Lancet meta-analysis that we probed in our last issue discussed
the bias and the negativity that the conventional medicine is brewing
against homeopathy. The effort to ban many useful homeopathic medicines
or to restrict their sale seems to be just another tactic to nip
the system. You can not ban a medicine until it is proved to be
harmful. But the ban of nosodes and animal remedies in France is
entirely unsubstantiated. It has never been proved that these medicines
have been the cause of any infection or disease outbreak. Have the
authorities ever banned any conventional medicine on such assumption?
On one hand these people suggest that homeopathic medicine does
not work and on the other hand they assume that homeopathic medicines
may work dangerously. Isn't it ironical!
If it continues this way, these guys will soon put a ban on all
mineral remedies too. Minerals are potentially toxic. What will
you do without your Argentums, Kalis, Iods, Aurums, Platina and
more? And even our dear Belladonna will be out of our reach
...leave aside Lachesis & Scorpion! Why don't these people realize
that in crude form and in excess nearly everything can have toxic
effects. Nearly every allopathic medicine has known adverse effects,
yet they do not put a ban on them. And here we have homeopathic
medicines which are being banned or restricted just on the assumption
that they may prove harmful!
What is your opinion on this issue? Do you think that homeopathic
medicines should be more strictly regulated? If yes, then why? And
if no, then how do we fight such suppression of our system? Share
your views and opinions with me at editor@hpathy.com.
This month our poll question also asks the same question. Please
do vote and participate in the ongoing discussion.
Now I come back to the ezine in general. This is the last issue
for the year 2005. This year has been a very special year for Hpathy.com
and for this ezine, Homeopathy 4 Everyone. There have been
many landmarks throughout the year but crossing the 100,000 visitors
per month for Hpathy.com and increasing the subscriber base of Homeopathy
4 Everyone to more than 10,000 were worth celebrating. These
landmarks just reflect the support and the participation of the
homeopathic community in this movement called Hpathy! I hope in
the coming year too we will continue to receive your love, affection,
support and feedback. I also wish that in the year 2006 we will
see many more professional homeopaths coming forward to join this
movement.
This month's issue comes to you with some very useful and thought-provoking
articles. Read and Enjoy! Do remember to check the result of our
last month's quiz and also send in your feedback about this journal
and Hpathy.com at editor@hpathy.com.
Seasons Greetings for the Holidays.
Yours sincerely,

-- Chief Editor --
Homeopathy 4 Everyone
|