| When I entered into the world of homeopathy as a
young student, I found out very soon that the satisfaction level
of homeopathy students was very low in general. The atmosphere in
the majority of our institutions was not conducive to constructive
growth. As I grew older, I found out that there was little harmony
between our teaching faculty and practitioners. There was more show
and little substance. The frustration levels were high and back-biting
was common. I thought this must be present only at the local level.
But then I started interacting with other people at the national
level and found the same sorry state. People with little understanding
of homeopathy were sitting at the helm in all our administrative
and professional bodies and there was a continuous struggle to show
their supremacy. I thought this was happening only in India. When
Hpathy came into existence, I started interacting with people at
the international level and soon realized that this problem was
not limited to India alone. It was present in every country where
there were more than a handful of homeopaths. Lack of trust for
other homeopaths and lack of understanding for others' work was
(and is) very common. There have been times when I have felt very
sad with the state of affairs. Now, after some more years of experience,
I realize that such struggle for power is not unique to homeopathy,
but is present in all sectors. Somehow, it seems more common and
more visible within our homeopathic community!
Over the years, I have seen such a variety of insincere people
that it makes me wonder whether the majority of homeopaths are themselves
in need of homeopathic treatment. I have seen people presenting
fake and fabricated cases in seminars, boasting of single remedy
cures when they actually prescribed eight remedies in one go, calling
themselves international teachers when they do not even understand
Organon properly, writing books by copying material from ten other
books, calling their small clinic a 'research center', fighting
elections for homeopathic government bodies when they do not even
practice homeopathy and criticizing other people's work without
even studying it properly. I wonder if the rubric 'Indifference,
apathy; Conscience, to the dictates of:' fits all these people.
Sometimes these facts fill me with a sense of revulsion and sometimes
they make me resolve to work constructively stronger.
In the last decade, we have seen an increasing divide among international
homeopathy groups. The points of contention are often the new developments,
approaches, theories and teachers. To create better understanding
of all the new concepts and to discuss their role within the scope
of homeopathic principles, the Hpathy Team has decided to initiate
an open international dialogue. Our aim is to provide more information
about the new developments, answer objections and criticism in a
constructive way, and discuss their scope, benefits and limitations.
You can read the full proposal draft for this dialogue at the link
below:
http://www.hpathy.com/papersnew/hpathy-dialogue.asp
We have received very positive replies from our leading homeopaths
and the majority of them have already agreed to contribute to this
dialogue. I invite you all to come forward and participate in this
exchange of information and experiences. Let us all work together
to create greater harmony among homeopaths.
Our current issue of Homeopathy 4 Everyone is
dedicated to another new development in homeopathy - Homeopathic
Facial Analysis (HFA) for finding out the underlying miasm of a
person. The work has been pioneered by our eminent colleagues Grant
Bentley and Louise Barton. Read their interesting Hot-Seat interview
and find articles and cases that elaborate the concept of HFA. There
is much more! I hope you will enjoy reading the articles in this
issue as much as we have enjoyed putting them together. Do send
me your feedback at editor@hpathy.com
about various articles in this issue.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours Sincerely,

-- Chief Editor --
Homeopathy 4 Everyone |