|
Feedback to Alize Timmerman Interview
The use of potencies.
With more than moderate interest I read the interview with Alize
Timmerman.
The C4 philosophy seems to me to be a very interesting one. The
question that arises reading about the different levels of the different
potencies (C1 to C8) is about the source. Where does this knowledge
come from? Is it really scientifically and empirically explored
or just hypothetical? I consider this to be a very important topic
because when somebody important as Alize Timmerman makes such a
statement about the use of potencies many homeopaths, and student
for certain, will follow these directions as an undeniable truth.
It must however be emphasized that this approach to the potency
problem, how valuable it may seem, has nothing to do with Samuel
Hahnemann. According to Hahnemann the only goal is to treat the
imbalanced Dynamis!
Hahnemann Organon $ 11 Sixth Edition
When a person falls ill, it is only this spiritual, self acting
(automatic) vital force, everywhere present in his organism, that
is primarily deranged by the dynamic 1 influence upon it of a morbific
agent inimical to life; it is only the vital force, deranged to
such an abnormal state, that can furnish the organism with its disagreeable
sensations, and incline it to the irregular processes which we call
disease; for, as a power invisible in itself, and only cognizable
by its effects on the organism, its morbid derangement only makes
itself known by the manifestation of disease in the sensations and
functions of those parts of the organism exposed to the senses of
the observer and physician, that is, by morbid symptoms, and in
no other way can it make itself known. 2
Hahnemann Organon $ 17 Sixth Edition
Now, as in the cure effected by the removal of the whole of the
perceptible signs and symptoms of the disease the internal alteration
of the vital principle to which the disease is due - consequently
the whole of the disease - is at the same time removed,1 it follows
that the physician has only to remove the whole of the symptoms
in order, at the same time, to abrogate and annihilate the internal
change, that is to say, the morbid derangement of the vital force
- consequently the totality of the disease, the disease itself.2
But when the disease is annihilated the health is restored, and
this is the highest, the sole aim of the physician who knows the
true object of his mission, which consists not in learned - sounding
prating, but in giving aid to the sick.
When following Hahnemann in using potentized remedies we can find
his following remarks.
Hahnemann: Chronic diseases Page 145:
"Homoeopathy, by a certain treatment of the crude medicinal
substances, which had not been invented before its foundation and
development, advances them into the state of progressive and high
development of their indwelling forces, in order that it may then
use them in curing in the most perfect manner. Some of these medicines
in their crude state seem to have a very imperfect, insignificant
medicinal action."
"The changes which take place in material substances, especially
in medicinal ones, through long-continued triturations with a non-medicinal
powder, or when dissolved, through a long-continued shaking with
a non-medicinal fluid, are so incredible, that they approach the
miraculous, and it is a cause of joy that the discovery of these
wonderful changes belongs to Homoeopathy."
To produce effective homeopathic remedies the process of dynamization
or potentization should therefore be undertaken. In order to free
the latent medicinal powers the substance to be potentized should
be triturated up to C3 after which every substance can be dissolved
in water and alcohol.
Potentizing remedies is necessary to create remedies that are able
to reach the dynamis in a direct manner and thus cure the dynamic
cause of disease.
Hahnemann: Chronic diseases page 149:
"In order to produce a homogeneity in the preparation of the
homoeopathic and especially the antipsoric remedies, at least in
the form of powders, I advise the reducing of medicines only to
this millionth potency (C3), no more and no less and to prepare
from this the solutions and the necessary potencies of these solutions;
this has been my own custom."
After reaching the C3 level every substance can be dissolved in
water and alcohol. Hahnemann obviously did not triturate the remedies
to C4 or higher.
Hahnemann: Chronic diseases page 146:
"What can I say of the pure metals and of their sulphurets,
but that all of them, without any exception become by this treatment
equally soluble in water and in alcohol, and every one of them develops
the medicinal virtue peculiar to it in the purest, simplest manner
and in an incredibly high degree?
But the chemical medicinal substances thus prepared now also stand
above the chemical laws."
The process of creating energetic remedies is called potentizing
or dynamizing. There is no distinction made by Hahnemann between
the processes of triturating or succussing other than that the process
of trituration is needed to prepare insoluble substances to be dissolved
in water and alcohol.
Hahnemann's Organon $ 269 Sixth Edition
This remarkable change in the qualities of natural bodies develops
the latent, hitherto unperceived, as if slumbering2 hidden, dynamic
($11) powers which influence the life principle, change the well-being
of animal life.3 This is effected by mechanical action upon their
smallest particles by means of rubbing and shaking and through the
addition of an indifferent substance, dry of fluid, are separated
from each other. This process is called dynamizing, potentizing
(development of medicinal power) and the products are dynamizations4
or potencies in different degrees.
A very often occurring misconception of idea is that the centesimal
potencies should be succussed 100 times to prepare a next potency.
This at least is not according the instructions of Hahnemann. Reading
the Sixth Edition of the Organon we see that 100 shakes only are
used to prepare the LM potencies!
Hahnemann: Chronic diseases page 150:
The preparation of the higher potencies is then continued with two
strokes of the arm**
(** After many experiments and searching comparisons with the patients
I have for several years preferred from conviction to give to the
medicinal fluids which are to be elevated to higher potencies and
at the same time to be rendered milder, only two shakes (with two
strokes of the arm) instead of the ten shakes given by others, because
the potentizing in the latter case by the repeated shaking passes
far beyond the attenuation at every step (though this is one hundred
fold)
Hahnemann remarks that more shakes passes far beyond the dilution.
Therefore the remedy loses its capacity to provoke a mild reaction
of the dynamis.
Hahnemann's Organon $ 269 Sixth Edition, Footnote 6:
"But with so small a diluting medium as 100 to 1 of the medicine,
if many succussions by means of a powerful machine are forced into
it, medicines are then developed which, especially in the higher
degrees of dynamization, act almost immediately, but with furious,
even dangerous violence, especially in weakly patients, without
having a lasting, mild reaction of the vital principle".
If a remedy acts violently the reaction of the vital force will
be equally vigorously. Therefore the remedy will most probably act
only for a very short time. (Action= reaction principle)
Due to his experiments and experience working with the potencies
Hahnemann concluded the centesimal potencies to be kind of 'a mistake!'
Hahnemann's Organon $279 Sixth Edition, Footnote 1:
"The praise bestowed of late years by some few homeopathists
on the larger doses is owing to this, either that they chose low
dynamizations of the medicines to be administered, as I myself used
to do for many years, from not knowing any better, or that the medicines
selected were not perfectly homeopathic".
The dose using the centesimal potencies is much larger (dilution
1:100) than using LM-potencies (dilution 1:50.000)
The Centesimal potencies are only shaken twice and therefore where
called the low dynamizations.
During the 1820's Hahnemann mainly used the centesimal potencies
as is stated in the publication of the chronic diseases of 1828.
During these years Hahnemann practiced the 'prescribe and wait',
waiting for 30 to 100 days, which he abandoned with the publication
of the fifth edition of the Organon where he prescribed homeopathic
remedies on a weekly basis.
Hahnemann's Organon $ 247 Fifth Edition.
"Under these conditions, the smallest doses of the best selected
homeopathic medicine may be repeated with the best, often with incredible
results, at intervals of fourteen, twelve, ten, eight, seven days,
and, where rapidity is requisite, in chronic diseases resembling
cases of acute disease, at still shorter intervals, but in acute
diseases at very much shorter periods - every twenty - four, twelve,
eight, four hours, in the very acutest every hour, up to as often
as every five minutes, - in ever case in proportion to the more
or less rapid course of the diseases and of the action of the medicine
employed, as is more distinctly explained in the last note".
Furthermore Hahnemann?s experience led him to prescribe the homeopathic
potentized remedies even more often i.e. on a daily basis, but only
under certain conditions. In the last publication of the Chronic
diseases of 1837 Hahnemann writes.
Hahnemann: Chronic diseases 1837.
"Concerning the technical part of homoeopathy"
Experience has shown me, as it has no doubt also shown to most of
my followers, that it is most useful in diseases of any magnitude
(no excepting even the most acute, and still more so in the half-acute,
in the tedious and most tedious) to give to the patient the powerful
homoeopathic pellet or pellets only in solution, and this solution
in divided doses. In this way we give the medicine, dissolved in
seven to twenty tablespoonfuls of water without any addition, in
acute and very acute diseases every six, four or two hours; where
the danger is urgent, even every hour or every half-hour, a tablespoonful
at a time; with weak persons or children, only a small part of a
tablespoonful (one or two teaspoonfuls or coffee spoonfuls) may
be given as a dose. In chronic diseases I have found it best to
give a dose (e. g., a spoonful) of a solution medicine a least every
two days, more usually every day.
Even in the use of centesimal potencies Hahnemann prescribed on
a daily basis! The method of waiting 30 to 100 days after prescribing
is obviously based on the 4th edition of the Organon (1829) and
the first publication of the Chronic diseases (1828)! The development
of homeopathy in the late 19th and early 20th century in America
must therefore considered to be based on the 4th edition of the
Organon.
The publication of 1837 is preceding Hahnemann?s Paris period where
the development of yet another potency scale was realized, the LM-potency
scale. The LM potencies are prescribed in the same way Hahnemann
prescribed the centesimal potencies already in 1837.
.
The publication of the 6th edition of the Organon took another 78
years. In the meanwhile homeopathy went 'worldwide' based on, yes,
the 4th edition of the Organon.
Generations of homeopaths learned to practice homeopathy and prescribe
their potencies based on the 4th edition which, according to Hahnemann
in the 6th edition of the Organon, was to be considered a mistake.
Beside the homeopathic classification of diseases, the use of LM-potencies
also became oblivious. This has worked out to be a very much against
the interest of homeopathy. It might be one of the main reasons
why homeopathy is in decline worldwide.
The LM's are shaken 100 times between every step.
Hahnemann Organon $ 270 Sixth Edition
In order to best obtain this development of power, a small part
of the substance to be dynamized, say one grain, is triturated for
three hours with three times one hundred grains sugar of milk according
to the method described below 1 up to the one-millionth part in
powder form. For reasons given below (b) one grain of this powder
is dissolved in 500 drops of a mixture of one part of alcohol and
four parts of distilled water, of which one drop is put in a vial.
To this are added 100 drops of pure alcohol 2 and given one hundred
strong succussions with the hand against a hard but elastic body.3
This is the medicine in the first degree of dynamization with which
small sugar globules 4 may then be moistened 5 and quickly spread
on blotting paper to dry and kept in a well-corked vial with the
sign of (I) degree of potency. Only one 6 globule of this is taken
for further dynamization, put in a second new vial (with a drop
a water in order to dissolve it) and then with 100 powerful succussions.
It might seem quite euphoric but the Master himself called the
LM-potency the most perfect potency. For homeopath?s it must be
considered an important invitation to study and use these potencies.
Hahnemann Organon $270 Sixth Edition, footnote 7.
This assertion will not appear improbable, if one considers that
by means of this method of dynamization (the preparations thus produced,
I have found after many laborious experiments and counter-experiments,
to be the most powerful and at the same time mildest in action,
i.e., as the most perfected) the material part of the medicine is
lessened with each degree of dynamization 50,000 times yet incredibly
increased in power, so that the further dynamization of 125 and
18 ciphers reaches only the third degree of dynamization. The thirtieth
thus progressively prepared would give a fraction almost impossible
to be expressed in numbers. It becomes uncommonly evident that the
material part by means of such dynamization (development of its
true, inner medicinal essence) will ultimately dissolve into its
individual spirit-like, (conceptual) essence. In its crude state
therefore, it may be considered to consist really only of this underdeveloped
conceptual essence.
The LM potencies have to be considered the high potencies meant
by Hahnemann as they are shaken 100 times for the preparation of
every next potency.
Therefore in using the LM's every potency can or must be used.
In the centesimal potencies the level of potency only very slowly
rises, therefore the intermediate potencies are omitted during treatment.
We only use the Kentian scale. (C30, C200 etc.). Using the LM's
we can use every potency.
Using the LM's the curative power of homeopathic remedies is boosted
tremendously. These potencies can be administered on a daily base
and therefore their healing capacity is raised.
Hahnemann Organon $ 246 Sixth Edition
"..And this may be very happily affected, as recent and oft-repeated
observations have taught me under the following conditions: firstly,
if the medicine selected with the utmost care was perfectly homeopathic;
secondly, if it is highly potentized, dissolved in water and given
in proper small dose that experience has taught as the most suitable
in definite intervals for the quickest accomplishment of the cure
but with the precaution, that the degree of every dose deviate somewhat
from the preceding and following in order that the vital principle
which is to be altered to a similar medicinal disease be not aroused
to untoward reactions and revolt as is always the case1 with unmodified
and especially rapidly repeated doses."
1 What I said in the fifth edition of the Organon, in a long note
to this paragraph in order to prevent these undesirable reactions
of the vital energy, was all the experience I then had justified.
But during the last four or five years, however, all these difficulties
are wholly solved by my new altered but perfected method. The same
carefully selected medicine may now be given daily and for months,
if necessary in this way, namely, after the lower degree of potency
has been used for one or two weeks in the treatment of chronic disease,
advance is made in the same way to higher degrees, (beginning according
to the new dynamization method, taught herewith with the use of
the lowest degrees).
Hahnemann Organon $ 246 Sixth Edition, Footnote 1
We ought not even with the best chosen homeopathic medicine, for
instance one pellet of the same potency that was beneficial at first,
to let the patient have a second or third dose, taken dry. In the
same way, if the medicine was dissolved in water and the first dose
proved beneficial, a second or third and even smaller dose from
the bottle standing undisturbed, even in intervals of a few days,
would prove no longer beneficial, even though the original preparation
had been potentized with ten succussions or as I suggested later
with but two succussions in order to obviate this disadvantage and
this according to above reasons. But through modification of every
dose in its dynamization degree, as I herewith teach, there exists
no offence, even if the doses be repeated more frequently, even
if the medicine be ever so highly potentized with ever so many succussions.
It almost seems as if the best selected homeopathic remedy could
best extract the morbid disorder from the vital force and in chronic
disease to extinguish the same only if applied in several different
forms
Talking about high potencies Hahnemann obviously means the LM potencies.
For the future development of homeopathy it is, I think it of great
importance that the statements we make on behalf of homeopathy must
scientifically and empirically be true and not just based on opinion
or fashion.
Ewald Stoeteler.
Classical homeopath,
Almelo, the Netherlands.
www.classicalhomeopathy.eu
-------------------------------------------
Sir,
The reply of Dr.Vithoulkas to my query is very convincing and all
the credit goes to you for starting such a wonderful feature in
your website. I find the contents/articles of the magazine very
thoughtful and knowledgeable. Thank.
Dr.Shiv Dua
-------------------------------------------
We must have more cartoons from Alan Schmukler! I so admire his
artistic talent. One cartoon per issue is not enough!
Elaine Lewis
-------------------------------------------
I really enjoyed the audio lectures that you started. Bedsides
of being interest some of them were useful as a teaching aid. I
hope you will have some more soon, especially those related to the
Organon.
karen gorman
-------------------------------------------
Super Ezine
A Dummy’s Guide to LM Potencies by Dr. Manish Bhatia, The
Importance of Potency Choice, Dilution and Dose with case examples
by Marc Van Wijk, Titration by Alize Timmermann and Archived Articles
on Posology by Edward De Beukelaer for bringing all together and
were I found to be all super informative articles. I learned a lot
from these articles and appreciate the authors for contributing
their knowledge and grateful to all and Ezine for printing this
fantastic edition. It just gets better and better.
jim hebert
-------------------------------------------
Loved the two cartoons in the Oct. issue. Great!
Lola Padula
-------------------------------------------
I did receive the October issue. Thank you very much. I am very
impressed with your issues and I look forward to receiving future
one.
Sincerely,
Laura Harr
-------------------------------------------
thanks magazine is informative and helpful sir could u send me
article and treatment of macular degeneration with rpe and atorpy
and medicines used with success
regards
debashis
-------------------------------------------
The October issue was incredible!!!! touching CRUCIAL topics like
potency selection, dosing, aggravations..
My favorite article was "Potency Selection Guidelines by Dr.
Hahnemann" by Dr. Manish Bhatia . VERY ENRICHING!!
One article that left me kind of "incomplete and wanting more"
was "Who Says What About Dose and Dilution" by Edward
De Beukelaer.
I'd love for you to include information and advise on the best ways
to go about Homeopathic Vaccinations. How to use them, when to use
them, how often etc, etc, etc...
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR ALL YOU DO!!! KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK!!!
Juliette Grosclaude
---------------------------------------------
Dear Ed:
Your editorial is interesting.
Thanks
Jahangir Satti, Ph.D., D.A.B.R.
---------------------------------------------
this is to thanks so much for the the october issue, as usual interesting
and informative.
congratulations for your efforts and generosity,
best regards,
hilda jacobsen
---------------------------------------------
i am very happy to say you that i am getting so many benefits by
your regular articles.
thanks.
Amrit Raj
---------------------------------------------
Dear Editor,
I have really enjoyed the issue today. I has given insight into
the selection of the potency. It contains three articles on potency.
You know that there are number of cases on bronchitis or oesteo
arthritis or skin allergy in India. It will be great help for the
probationers to have cases on these fields.
Love and regards
S. C. Kursija
---------------------------------------------
Your edition is full of very interesting matter as always. George
Vithoulkas answers are particularly helpful. thanks.
Sohani
---------------------------------------------
As usual the content is excellent. Well done.
Regards
Christine Moss
---------------------------------------------
Thank you so much. I look forward to the learning experience each
month,
Jean
----------------------------------------
Dear Hpathy,
I recommend Hpathy to all homeopaths and hope that students find
it early on in their studies.
As a final year student I am very appreciative of Hpathy Ezine for
the many times I have been able to reference suitable articles for
assignments. I have also received plenty of inspiration for assignment
topics through your articles.
When doing a general search I often come across an article from
Hpathy Ezine covering the topic at hand.
I am a firm devotee and look forward to upon graduation in the next
month maybe having some time to read in more depth the articles
not associated with an assignment.
A topic that I would be interested in you addressing is one I just
completed a research assignment on which was chosen due to perceived
controversy.
My topic was Adamas Trituration vs Diamond Immersion: Does trituration
preparation produce a different homeopathic medicine to an immersion
preparation of the same crude substance? Of course your recent article
by Alize Timmerman highlighted further aspects of trituration for
which I thank you. Peter Tumminello and his book "The Twelve
Jewels" enlightens us on the gem immersions.
The other controversy here is the proving method. An example is
with the Pearl provings. The Pearl immersion has been proved both
by Alistair Gray with a Hahnemanian proving & Peter Tumminello
as a meditative proving.
I have been a participant in a conference Tumminello gem immersion
meditative proving and was thoroughly impressed. I must admit to
having been slightly skeptic at the outset but nothing changes you
faster than
experiencing it for yourself.
Regards
Fiona Proven
Brisbane
----------------------------------------
Thank you very much, I shall read all this, Edward de Beukelaer
will translate my answers.
First, I am interested by Ananda's conceptions, which are closely
near Dr Masi's ones :
the wound : the vulnerability
The wall : the égotrophie.
The mask : the égotrophie "masquée".
Dr Masi added the égolyse, (the failure of the wall), and
the hétérolyse (the vengeance).
Dr Masi adds the metaphysic conflict which cause the individuals'
specific manner of defense .
Kind regards
S Fayeton
----------------------------------------
dear editor,
Peace be with you. The feed back of last month is highly highly
appreciated. I don't think such a wonderful program anybody else
is running so for.
Keep it up, show your concern for the earth, and it will Instruct
Peace be with you,
M kaiser
toronto
----------------------------------------
Brilliant!
Thank you
This is as the previous issues are first class. For me personally
LIFE CHANGINGLY so.
With best wishes
Judith
canada
----------------------------------------
Dear Editor
As a new graduate in homeopathy I am finding the articles in your
magazine extremely helpful in helping me find the remedy picture
Beverley Brown NZ
----------------------------------------
The articles are excellent and I enjoy very much everything you
publish on line about Homeopathy.
My health has improved a lot since I started using homeopathic remedies.
Thanks a lot
Madalena.
----------------------------------------------
Hi there,
I like your e-zine very much. To be honest I am pretty lazy to
give you feedback in more detail or to be specific, but it would
be convenient if there is something like poll and you just tick
some boxes or percentage and send it back with speed of a click.
Think about it
have a great day
Roman
--------------------------------------------
I love the hpathy magazine and I have recently given your details
to a load of colleagues.
Silson
-------------------------------------
bout who says what
Dear Friends,
excuse for my English. About the question of use homeopathic remedies
and right doses, I think that we must study with great attention
the books of Masi and Candegabe, and Organon too.
The ideas of these Masters of Our Art of healing derived directly
by Kent and Allen and Ghatak.
It is very important the study of energetic level of disease, the
dynamic prognosis of disease. So, it is possible a dynamic lecture
of Kent's learnigs about prognosis. High level of energy, with clear
mental symptoms are linked at high level of energy and so we must
use high doses (200, MK, XMK, CMK).
Low level with no characteristic symptoms are linked to low energy
and so we must use low doses (organic doses, also < 12CH).
The frequency is difficult, but we must remember that Homeopathy
is impulse, energetic information.
This aspect is more important that frequency, I think.
Excuse my English.
Regards
Dott. Paolo Rossetti,
Medical Natural Center of Animal Diseases - Homeopathy
AUSL 11 Empoli, Toscany, Italy.
-------------------------------------
The oct ezine was very informative. And it helped me enhance my
homeopathic knowledge
Nilay Trivedi
------------------------------------
I liked the Schmuckler pieces, Cuba, lambs, and Zaren book review.
let's see if this mail gets thru - in the past when I've sent comments
the mail bounced.
Carol Willis
-------------------------------------
I always enjoy reading the articles in your homeopathy journal.
Thanks for all the hard work.
Sheila Brewis
-------------------------------------
dear Elaine,
its a guess but its worth a try i would have thought of AGARICUS
M as the October Quiz remedy. will await the answer next month
PS your article on success rates was very well written & as
they would say in old english "she certainly knows her onions"
i am trying to get the book you mentioned for acutes in INDIA [Homeopathic
Medicine in the Home by Breslow] seems difficult though
regards
dr sacheen khirid
-------------------------------------
The Articles are very beautiful and very useful to know good practice
of homeopathy.
Thank You Sir.
V.Siva Kumar.
-------------------------------------
Dear Editors,
Your October 2008 ezine to be informative and education, as have
been all your ezine's, I especially enjoyed "The importance
of potency choice,dilution and dose" from Marc Van Wijk. I
believe this to be an important subject as potency, dilution and
dose?need to be tailored to each individual case for maximum effectiveness
and maximum benefit
Sincerely
Michele Santos.
-------------------------------------
All efforts being put in this valuable website is highly acknowledged
regards
Ashfaq
-------------------------------------
I enjoy a lot reading all the articles and look forward to the
next issue.
Luis Wolman
-------------------------------------
So sorry I don't feed back. I love getting and having the info,
but don't often take the time to read,#. I just bob in there when
I have the luxury of a few minutes spare. I do want it though.
Kind regards
Chris griffiths
-------------------------------------
Choice of Potency
I have a feeling that in chronic cases, once we have chosen the
right medicine according to the symptoms of the patient, we may
start with low potency like 30C. This may be tried at least for
2 weeks (twice a day). If there is status quo or some improvement,
next higher potency (200C) of the same medicine may be given for
a week or 10 days (once daily). If the medicine is really working,
some appreciable improvement is likely to be seen. If so, give 1M
potency 1 dose every week for 2 or 3 consecutive weeks. Finally
give one dose of 10 M. Perhaps further medication may not be necessary.
If during the above course of treatment, at any stage there is some
deterioration or change of symptoms, medicine may have to be changed.
I have applied the above plan in case of my wife. She had severe
dementia = forgetfulness, lying listless, not talking at all, not
responding, not recognizing people, not showing interest in any
thing, unable to walk, etc. I found Picric Acid
(Picricum acidum) very matching with her symptoms, and I gave her
this medicine as per plan mentioned above. I got wonderful results.
Besides, 30C and 200C as per above plan, she has so far been given
3 doses of 1M during the last three weeks. Now she talks as freely
as she used to earlier. Shows interest in household matters, wants
to know what is happening, is able to walk with support, recognizes
people, remembers old events, but some times gets confused. On the
whole there is remarkable recovery. I find some improvement in her
condition daily. I do hope she
will improve further. Here I must mention that we are continuing
allopathic medicines also prescribed by
Neurologist. The medicines are Aricep 10 (1 tablet at night) and
Admenta one tablet in the morning and 2 at night. We were told that
these medicines are for maintaining the status quo, but the damage
that has already occurred to the brain and the memory already lost
are not recoverable. Hence I had to look for alternative treatment
(Homeopathy), and got tremendous success.
I would like to have the opinion of practicing Homeopaths.
O.P.Saxena
-------------------------------------
Dear Editor
I am totally amazed by your october issue. I am still working on
it. I am personally very grateful to all of you. Keep up good working.
Take Care
Ahmad Obaidus Sattar Bhuiya
-------------------------------------
great as always
thank you!
Maly
-------------------------------------
One of the most educational issues I’ve ever read. Learned
a lot about dosages and potencies. Good job in promoting the spread
of Homeopathy by educating everyone like this issue surely does.
Thanks to all the intellectuals who contributed thanks to
you and Ezine.
Jim Hebert
-------------------------------------
Dear editor ,
your all issues are very interesting and informative. surely it
sharpens our knowledge. it is a nice world platform to share for
common cause to popularize our homeopathy. 'unity in diversity'
through this art of healing to serve suffering humanity in benign
way. kudos to you and to your entire team.
thank you.
CS VENKATESH
-------------------------------------
Dear Sir,
What captures all the attention in the October issue of ezin is
I think, the subject of Posology. The compilation of words of our
great past teachers teaches about the basics of the subject.
If I look into my practice, so far, I find that, whenever selection
of the remedy was done correctly by me, patients were relieved of
symptoms for quite a long time just with a single dose, & a
complete cure was achieved after repeating few more doses following
or not following homeopathic aggravation. Cases not interfered,
not abused and not complicated by conventional mode of treatment
gets even completely cured by single doses and without any homeopathic
aggravation. Mostly children and teen agers contribute to such simple
cures. Pathological cases also when untouched
by any other mode of treatment, straight away comes to homeopathy
and, if correct medicine is found, gets cured within few days with
single dose of 10M potency without any aggravation. I remember a
case of huge haemorrhagic/chocolate cyst containing of about 1lit
of blood inside, in young unmarried girl, got cured by single
dose of 10M of the selected remedy within 2 days. The blood got
reabsorbed and cyst shrunk. And the girl put on straight away 6
kgs. of weight in next 2 months thus, improving her general condition
as well. Cases of migraines are a bit difficult to handle I feel.
Because the pains are so severe patients just can not resist themselves
form not taking painkillers. So it is difficult to find the original
unmodified picture of the disease & if it is found, they require
more frequent repeatation than other cases. And many times it becomes
difficult to differentiate between relapse of original disease symptoms
& homeopathic aggravation. I remember a case of a migraine,
who initially responded very well with every dose of 10M of selected
medicine in every episode of headache she got with definite improvement
in
general condition as well but, at one particular day she stopped
responding to any of the potencies & to any number of repeatation.
The headache was just continued for quite a long time. I referred
her to some other doctor thinking that I am not able to understand
her case properly. She stopped visiting me there after. After one
year her husband met me on road and, I just asked him how is his
wife doing now. And he surprisingly said that they did not need
to go to another doctor. After stopping homeopathic medicines, she
slowly recovered on her own. She did not need any
painkiller also since then. And now she is completely alright having
no headaches and off all the medicines. Then I realized that it
was the homeopathic aggravation which I was thinking as her disease
symptoms and all I needed to do was not repeating the dose any more
and let the aggravation run its course and let the cure follow.
So, as Dr. Hahnemann has rightly said that, correct selection of
right medicine alone is not enough to achieve cure. Cure is based
on three legged stool of principle of selection of most similar
medicine, principle of selection of correct potency and principle
of correct dose.
With warm wishes,
Dr.Ami
-------------------------------------
Hi
This was my first Ezine. I'm not a qualified homoepath but have
done some courses and sometime when I'm free from my full time occupation
I'd like to study and qualify. I'm very interested also in the results
in animals as I've treated my dogs quite successfully for a few
years, as and when required.
Frankly I found the ezine fascinating. Some of it went over my head
but articles like the one about 1Ms were so informative, I'm sure
I'm going to learn loads from this and future issues.
Regards,
Pam Needham
-------------------------------------
Thank you,
I have found interesting the papers about LM.
X Bargallo.
-------------------------------------
Dear every body at Hpathy.com,
I am V. Hari Hara Prasad, a homoeo enthusiast. I have seen your
site and I have subscribed to it.
As I am not a physician, I barely understand a little of your book.
Even then, I have enjoyed about the Hahneman's potencies, curing
the diseases of the children and the conditions at cuba.
Thanks a lot for doing such a tremendous service to the humanity
With deep regards,
V. Hari Hara Prasad
-------------------------------------
First, thanks for the free email newsletter. It's packed with an
abundance of information!
Secondly, I am new to homeopathy -- just beginning to see the potential
that homeopathic care can have in my home and farm and beyond. Currently,
I'm just finishing a Basic Homeopathy Course with Mary Aspinwell
and Melissa Burch at Inner Healthy (online). A wealth of information
-- in which they recommended your website.
So, needless to say, as a beginner, lots of the information is
a bit over my head, yet, as I progress, this material will become
invaluable.
Thanks for the opportunity to learn from you~
Sincerely,
Patti Winter
-------------------------------------
Great magazine! Very interesting articles and opinions. Look forward
to it every month. Regards Catherine Chambers =
I received my first issue of Homeopathy 4 Everyone and I am very
grateful for the generous opportunity to learn from such a fine
resource. I will be reading more and responding as I progress through
my self-studies and self-treatment.
Sincerely,
Della V.
-------------------------------------
Dear Editor,
many thanks for the obituary for Ananda Zaren!
Great were the articles about potencies, dose and dilution referring
to Hahnemann's organon.
Kind regards
Martha Greiner-Jetha
-------------------------------------
I received October issue of Homeopathy 4 everyone and enjoy it
very much.
Thank you for it,
Dr Doina Pavlovschi
-------------------------------------
Dear Editor,
Thank you for this treasure of wisdom that you 're sending me online
every month. It Is very useful and refreshing .I have told my friends
of this field to be it's member. On subject you will get my comments
very soon.
Dr.Brijesh Tripathi
---------------------------------------------
THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR FEEDBACK
Send us your feedback, views, comments and suggestions
about various articles published in Homeopathy 4 Everyone
and Hpathy.com in general to Dr. B at editor@hpathy.com.
Your feedback is very important to us! |