|
As many of us might agree, there are very few subjects as emotionally
charged as the choice of one's diet. Sexual relations, marriage
and finances come to mind as similarly intense subjects and, like
diet, each of us is sure we know all we need to know about each
of these areas. The subject of milk, as I have discovered in the
past four years when properly viewed, will challenge every notion
you currently have about what is good food and what isn't.
The story of milk is complex and its history goes something like
this: Back in the pre-processed food era (i.e., before about 1930
in the U.S.) milk was considered a highly prized food, especially
for children. Not only was there an entire segment of our economy
built up around milk, but as I remember, each house had its own
direct milk chute for the delivery of fresh milk. It was unquestioned
that milk was good for us and that a safe, plentiful milk supply
was actually vital to our national health and well-being. It was
also a time (now I'm referring to the early part of the century)
when many of the illnesses which we currently suffer from were rare.
As an example, family doctors would often go their whole careers
without ever seeing a patient with significant coronary artery disease,
breast or prostate cancer. This is something current doctors can
hardly go one month before they encounter such a patient. Furthermore,
as scientists such as Western Price, D.D.S., had discovered, there
were pockets of extremely healthy, long-lived people scattered about
the earth who used dairy products in various forms as the staple
of their diets - further evidence that milk and its products were
amongst the most healthful foods human beings have ever encountered.
If we fast forward to the 1980's we now find an entirely different
picture. For one, there have been numerous books written in the
past decade about the dangers of dairy products _ the most influential
being a book called Don't Drink Your Milk1 by Frank Oski, M.D. He
is the current chairman of Pediatrics at Johns Hopkins University
and perhaps the most influential pediatrician in this country. In
his book, he pins just about each health problem in children to
the consumption of milk, including everything from acute and chronic
ear infections to constipation, asthma, eczema, etc. Secondly, just
about all patients, on their initial visit, proudly announce that
they have a good diet and that, specifically, they don't eat dairy
(which they pronounce with such disdain). One might well ask here
where is the truth in this picture?
Perhaps the experiments of Dr. Frances Pottenger2 in the 1940's
can help to solve this mystery. In these experiments Dr. Pottenger
fed similar groups of animals (usually cats) a diet of exclusively
milk. Half ate cooked milk (i.e., pasteurized), the other ate uncooked
(i.e., "raw" milk). The results were conclusive and astounding.
Those that ate raw milk did well, lived long, happy, active lives
free of any signs of degenerative disease. Those that ate pasteurized
milk suffered from acute illnesses (vomiting, diarrhea) and succumbed
to every degenerative disease now flourishing in our population.
By the third generation, a vast majority of the cats were infertile
and exhibited "anti-social" behavior. In short, medically
speaking, they were like many modern Americans.
Since the 40's, the "qualities" of milk have been extensively
studied to try to find an explanation for these dramatic changes.
We have heard discussed that before heating, milk is a living food
rich in colloidal minerals, rich in enzymes which are necessary
for the absorption and utilization of the sugars and fats in the
milk. We have also heard that milk has a cortisone-like factor which
is heat sensitive (i.e. destroyed by heat) in the cream; that milk
has an enzyme phosphatase which allows the body to absorb the calcium
from the milk; that milk has lactase - an enzyme which allows for
the digestion of lactose; and that milk has beneficial bacteria
and lactic acids which allow these beneficial bacteria to implant
in the intestines.
|