Homeopathy Forums http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/ This is an XML content feed of; Homeopathy Forums : Last 10 Posts Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:20:53 +0000 Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:47:33 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.54 30 www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/RSS_topic_feed.asp Homeopathy Forums http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_images/web_wiz_forums.png http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/ General Discussion : List of true Hahnemanian Homeopaths http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10617&PID=97435#97435 Author: Piyush Kumar
Subject: List of true Hahnemanian Homeopaths
Posted: 21 Nov. 09 at 09:47

Originally posted by Brisbanehomoeopath

How can someone claim to be a follower of Hahnemann, or claim to revere those masters who followed his method, but then admit to breaking the basic principles themselves (Single Remedy for instance)? Appears to me that people like to identify as strict traditional homoeopaths, but choose which rules they obey and which they don't. Or add things in, which Hahnemann never discussed but still maintain that they are following the path he set down.
 
In regards to taking cases 'instantly', I would think that following Aphorisms 82-104 would be impossible without taking the time to do it. More philosophy ignored because it is inconvenient?
 
Are you really saying, that it is the mark of a great homoeopath, to be able to prescribe on how a patient sits in their chair?? And yet you find Sankaran's ideas crazy. This is rather hypocritical. How can you revere one method but abhor the other?
 
You don't need to take 2 hours to take every case, many can be done in 15 mins, half an hour, an hour. You watch Sankaran take his cases now they are under an hour easy (chronic cases). Acutes can be much quicker. I can do sensation for an acute in about 15mins quite often.
 
 
 
 


Aphorisms 83-104 do not say that you need to interrogate all cases in like manner.....and it does not say that you need 2 hour session.......Late dr S R Phatak used to find out most characteristic in the case and prescribe on two to three most characteristic symptoms...

You say ....i violate no i have actually spoken the truth......in many cases i have seen giving only single remedy never is good....especially in pneumonia.....renal failure...and wait...i will post them...with all reasons ...

Dr H C Allen wrote the book ..Keynotes and characteristics with comparisons of some leading remedies of the materia medica  and also the author of other books too....

he recognised that patient sat down with ...so weak she drops into a chair...medicine stannum...and ofcourse few more symptoms confirmed it....

David go and read DrAllen 

You will forget the substances of homoeopathy and remember the characteristic of some remedies....

when is group prescribing justifiable.....and remedy proving in one conference justifiable....

i for me is nothing but  truth n  difficulties are.....dont be in delusion that i see only easy cases  ,,,,,i see and m proud to help cases like slip disc  ,,acute renal failure,,,pneumonias and gangrene cases........and nowhere i say that i dont use single remedy...i use,,,,,but many cases do require more than single remedy....and its the truth

will you not give hypetensive pt a remedy to control the high blood pressure,,,and a remedy to control his bld sugar....../////

HAHNEMANN IS AND WILL BE MINE IDEAL.......BUT I WILL NEVER RISK PATIENTS LIFE....HE ALSO USED TO PRESCRIBE INTERCURRENTS.....AND KNEW TO PRESCRIBE ON THE DEMANDING SYMPTOMS......

those who want to raise questions on this .....please first do your homework of reading lesser writings of boenninghausen and reading ORGANON AND CHRONIC DISEASES...

KAVIRAJ you cant leave your responsibility in this manner....reverse your decision
]]> Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:47:33 +0000 http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10617&PID=97435#97435 General Discussion : Why 6X is stronger than 3X? http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10731&PID=97434#97434 Author: newbirth2010
Subject: Why 6X is stronger than 3X?
Posted: 21 Nov. 09 at 09:13

So, I got everything WRONG.

Homeopathy is not directly related to substances but it is a totally different concept !

It is not taking the active ingredient that helps but taking a dilution of the active ingredient WITHOUT the active ingredient, if I understand right.

If it is like this then many people misunderstand what homeopathy is... Because they think that it is merely taking natural substances....Which is NOT !!!!

Thanks very much for your help. I am trying to keep up with these concepts.

Thanks,

Michael

]]> Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:13:42 +0000 http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10731&PID=97434#97434 Veterinary Homeopathy : Engorged Teats - Phantom pregnancy http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10680&PID=97432#97432 Author: edebeukelaer
Subject: Engorged Teats - Phantom pregnancy
Posted: 21 Nov. 09 at 07:45

The purpose of this forum is to discuss homeopathy rather than throw remedies around which, I think,  is not really what hahnemann wanted us to do anyway. Where your example prescriptions were very good quality, using urtica to dry up milk in a phantom appears to be either an experiment or an unnecessary precription. The remedy is not even present in 'chest milk- flowing -spontaneously' which could have been regarded as a homeopathic symptom in this case (although not completely uncommon). Extrapolating from using it to dry up breast milk or stimulate the milk in a nursing mother to using it to dry up milk in a phantom pregnancy appears challenging to me.
Am I psoric because of that? I don't compare aggravations and I am not overly worried about them but I have just come across them and every time it was a case of this for that prescription where no effort was made to look at the homeopathic aspects of the case. (that is what I meant with the example of staph: for a fracture take staph 200: this is a herbal indication so use a low potency that is just common sense). For me it is about respect for the patient. 
I suppose it is about keeping the right (fine) balance between the self help prescriber/first aid homeopathy which is a very helpful aspect of homeopathy and using/developing/promoting a homeopathy that can achieve so much more than one can imagine but only if there is a good understanding of its nature by the practitioners and the users. This portal tries to promote this understanding otherwise homeopathy may well end up next to the aspirin in pharmacies. 
I have come across too many people (Vets, doctors) who were taught the simplified homeopathy and got so frustrated with it that they gave it up because it did not work.


]]> Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:45:05 +0000 http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10680&PID=97432#97432 General Discussion : Why 6X is stronger than 3X? http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10731&PID=97431#97431 Author: sajjadakram
Subject: Why 6X is stronger than 3X?
Posted: 21 Nov. 09 at 07:39

It is said that through the process of trituration and succussion , some invisible forces are built up which makes the remedy stronger than the previous though having less material or no traces.
sajjad.]]> Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:39:19 +0000 http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10731&PID=97431#97431 General Discussion : Why 6X is stronger than 3X? http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10731&PID=97430#97430 Author: Manish Bhatia
Subject: Why 6X is stronger than 3X?
Posted: 21 Nov. 09 at 07:08

6X is not 'materially' stronger than 3X but it is more potentised. It is not the dilution of the active ingredient that in the only process involved in preparing homeopathic medicines, the process of trituration and succussion are known to have an influence on the medicine. If these terms and concepts are new for you, please refer to some source books and search for relevant research papers.]]> Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:08:31 +0000 http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10731&PID=97430#97430 Chit-Chat : FDA Warns on Homeopathy http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=9793&PID=97429#97429 Author: newbirth2010
Subject: FDA Warns on Homeopathy
Posted: 21 Nov. 09 at 06:43

Originally posted by pak123

Atleast they agreed homeopathic potencies / medicines do have ingredients and these can show reaction also.LOL


I never got that homeopathic potencies.Confused It looks that i need to pay somebody to tell me. !!! Dead
]]> Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:43:13 +0000 http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=9793&PID=97429#97429 General Discussion : Why 6X is stronger than 3X? http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10731&PID=97428#97428 Author: newbirth2010
Subject: Why 6X is stronger than 3X?
Posted: 21 Nov. 09 at 06:40

Why 6X is stronger than 3X?

For example, 3x = 1 part in 10 of solution, 3 times. So the final concentration is 1 in 10 x 10 x 10, or 1 in 1,000.

But, 6x = 1 part in 10 of solution, 6 times. The final concentration is 1 in 10 x 10 x 10 x 10 x 10 x 10, or 1 in 1,000,000.

So we have
(3x) 1 in 1,000
(6x) 1 in 1,000,000

From the above it is more logical to assume that 1 in 1,000 (3x) is stronger than 1 in 1,000,000 (6x)

Why then it is said that 6x is stronger than 3x whereas in 3x we have higher concentration of the active ingredient ?

Thanks

]]> Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:40:57 +0000 http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10731&PID=97428#97428 General Discussion : List of true Hahnemanian Homeopaths http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10617&PID=97427#97427 Author: sajjadakram
Subject: List of true Hahnemanian Homeopaths
Posted: 21 Nov. 09 at 06:38

Dear kaviraj,
I know what is happening and why is happening.Please reverse your decision.Shocked
sajjad.
]]> Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:38:51 +0000 http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10617&PID=97427#97427 General Discussion : List of true Hahnemanian Homeopaths http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10617&PID=97426#97426 Author: Kaviraj
Subject: List of true Hahnemanian Homeopaths
Posted: 21 Nov. 09 at 06:08

If someone after so many years has not the ability to recognise a remedy when it walks in the door, he better stop pretending to be a homoeopath. I can diagnose any case in the space of 2 minutes, just because i stick and stuck to the principles. Impossible is simply a word in a fool's dictionary.

Criticising someone for not sticking to principles without having any oneself is the height of Ozzie arrogance, reason i did not stay Down Under. I cannot stand arrogance - it is the most offensive of all.

While that may be beyond the comprehension of those who admit to be moderately capable, it is nonetheless true that skill is something that comes with the years and practise practise and more practise. If one cannot master MM after 15 years and 150.000 clients a year, one is simply not worth his salt.

Because my comments are not appreciated here - satire being beyond the comprehension of many here too - i have decided this is my last post in these forums. The stuck-up stuffiness of those without a sense of humour is beyond the pale. Moreover, all the mongrels here are destroying homoeopathy and i refuse to throw my pearls before swine - they trample them in the mud of their systems.

They should get some sense of history and realise it were the stupid mongrels who destroyed homoeopathy in the US in the late 1800's. That is much more offensive than a satirical piece about a modern system builder like Sankaran.

So goodbye to all my friends here - which are many - and i do hope the rest of the mongrels come to their senses, if they have any left.

Regards to all

Kaviraj.
]]> Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:08:15 +0000 http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10617&PID=97426#97426 Veterinary Homeopathy : Engorged Teats - Phantom pregnancy http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10680&PID=97425#97425 Author: elkfish
Subject: Engorged Teats - Phantom pregnancy
Posted: 21 Nov. 09 at 05:58

'The approach to this is very different from a phantom pregnancy whichis not an acute but a chronic disease. So there are pears and apples inthis thread.'

Well, to me it's all fruit! LOL
Having done a lot of reading around on Phantom pregnancies I think of it as self limiting and not requiring treatment as such - probably more the acute phase of what could turn out (if it should happen again!) to be a manifestation of a chronic problem, albeit not a life threatening one in the majority of cases. As it is her first season I will just have to wait. The tendency to have phantoms I would certainly treat on a constitutional level. I am reminded of the 'layers of an onion example' when looking at this problem from an acute/chronic angle.
I don't see Labour as a disease at all, merely a circumstance of high energy that can be helped to run smoothly with the help of remedies, and in that case  it is not only the remedy which has to be matched but also the potency.

'I know this is a very dark thought but sometimes I wonder: staphysagria 200 for a fracture?  I don't think so'

Never say never! If you rule any remedy out you've lost the case!

'In these acutes I am not worried about high diluted remedies. Inchronic cases, out of respect to the patient maybe we should temperourselves.'

You know Homeopathy is often described as 'Art and Science' - by Art I understand that which comes to us intuitively and we have no way of describing how we have come to it, whereas the science is the rational part of Homeopathy, the philosophy, the provings etc.  Potency choice to me falls into the 'Art'-side of Homeopathy.
Hahnemann knew what he was saying when he wrote that the physician must be an unprejudiced observer. It's probably one of the hardest things we have to discipline ourselves to do - especially when it comes to the creatures we love.

Elke Smile

PS. You veterinary homeopaths sound like 'psoric lot' if you come together comparing  thousands of aggravations and failures - only joking! LOL
]]> Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:58:12 +0000 http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=10680&PID=97425#97425