| AS: We’re
honored and delighted to have you with us today. I recently asked
several homeopaths who they would seek out if they had a health
problem. Each one said “Nancy Herrick”. Can you tell
us what originally inspired your passion for homeopathy?
NH: It was very simple. I was attending a 5 day
yoga course in Washington DC around 1970 and someone said there
was going to be a talk on something called " homeopathy"
at lunch time in the adjoining room. I thought "why not"
and went in there and it changed my life. I knew immediately that
I was going to take on homeopathy as my life's work. Funny isn't
it...I just knew. I had just one month prior finished my masters
degree in psychology and was running a small school for autistic
children at the time. I felt homeopathy can do more for autistic
children than all that training and work I am doing now. One month
later I returned and took a seminar on homeopathy and I have never
looked back.
AS: That was quite a dramatic
shift in careers. Did you bring something to homeopathy from your
years of studying psychology?
NH: Definitely, yes I did bring psychology to
homeopathy and was frustrated for many years by the lack of attention
we paid to the mental and emotional symptoms. Of course when I began
we only had Boericke, and Kent repertory and material medica. NO
teachers, no cases to study, no one with experience. Imagine that!
We even asked a very elderly group (mostly 90's) of MD homeopaths
in SF if we could quietly attend one of their meetings just to listen
and learn and they refused! They had agreed to not teach anyone
in exchange for the right to practice homeopathy and keep their
medical licenses.
So we took our own cases and struggled to find the remedy and prescribed
very strictly on repertory and tried to match it to Kent's descriptions
on his materia medica. The amazing thing is that we did have success.
As a study group we labored over cases and we did get some correct
prescriptions. This was in 1973-1975. Then we boldly decided to
open a clinic and began treating hundreds of patients. We were busy
beyond our wildest dreams from the very first day. We had a rule.
You had to consult on every case with one other homeopath in the
clinic. So we met in the back room. It was abuzz with activity.
We also made little papers with remedies in them and hand fed them
to our patients.
When we started seeing so many patients we could not help but pay
attention to the mental and emotional states of our patients....they
would not let us avoid it!! Then we heard of George Vithoulkas and
Bill Gray went to study with him in Greece and suddenly emotions
were a big part of the case.
AS: A real pioneering "learn
as you go" introduction to homeopathy. Once you discovered
the importance of mentals, did it add another dimension to case
taking? Psychologist Carl Rogers taught that the relationship with
the client is the healing dynamic in psychotherapy. What part does
relationship play in the case taking interview?
NH: Relationship in case taking is really important.
Roger and I have noted over the years that the really successful
homeopaths are not necessarily the very best technical homeopaths
but the people that really care about their patients as human beings.
I think it helps a lot to know yourself and to do some deep inner
work on yourself. Then you are more available to be there for the
patient. You literally have the space inside your head to really
see and hear the other.
AS: So it’s our own
blind spots and projections that may keep us from “experiencing
” the patient’s remedy. Sankaran seems quite adept at
creating that space to experience the patient. How has he influenced
your work?
NH: Rajan Sankaran has been by far the most influential
teacher in my homeopathic career. I went to sit in with him for
a month in 1994 and it revolutionized my work. At that time he was
working on animal, vegetable, mineral....now patently obvious to
us all. But then it was a dramatic breakthrough. I had been prescribing
Naja for many years but did not even know it was from a snake much
less the cobra. Homeopaths all over the world were doing the same.
Now, though many criticize him and his methods, the entire landscape
of our work has changed and it is due to his absolute brilliance
and creativity.
The latest work on sensations and hand gestures has been the icing
on the cake. Going into the patient's space with hand gestures and
following sensations is something that I believe, with training,
most of us can do. It gives us a very clear direction and IF we
can stay with it (the most challenging part) we are often graced
with the deepest simillimum. I have found remedies this way for
people who have been treated for many, many years without success.
So yes, this system allows the homeopath to by-pass his or her
own blocks or blind spots. Up until now we were stuck with trying
to heal them first!
AS: In contrast to Sankaran’s
very subjective approach, is Jan Sholten’s analysis based
on periodic table. It seems to be an attempt to move toward more
objectivity. Can these methods ever complement each other?
NH: The methods complement each other very nicely.
Jan is the originator of the basic ideas on the mineral kingdom
using the periodic table. This has been a powerful contribution
to homeopathy and is now used all over the world. In fact I envy
the new homeopaths coming into all these well developed ideas on
the kingdoms and miasms. They have such a head start in their studies.
Rajan, of course, also uses the periodic table. He has just completed
an in-depth book on the subject called "Structure".
I believe that we all need a combination of intuition and objective
knowledge and facts to be a good homeopath. I just taught a wonderful
case of an 8 year old girl with Juvenile Rheumatoid arthritis who
was in a lot of pain and misery. Both of her parents were orphans
and adopted. Her mother said of her that she "acted like an
orphan". She also had a craving for salads which we know is
unusual in a child. She had hot feet. No other symptoms. This is
a simple case from a pure materia medica perspective. Salads and
orphan are Magnesium and hot feet is Sulphur. Mag Sulph worked beautifully
for her and she is well 10 years later. The students were a bit
confused and some were trying to read more into the case. We still
need to know basic information and have facts at our fingertips.
Rajan, in fact, has the most access to this knowledge of basic materia
medica facts than anyone I have ever met. Just try it sometime and
ask him to tell you the remedies in a good rubric. He will know
them by heart.
When I teach with Roger or in my clinic with a patient, I am always
dancing with all the information and all ways to access it, that
I have at my disposal. But I will tell you one thing for sure. My
ability to get the correct remedy has been vastly improved by using
the sensation method. I am stunned over and over as the patient
comes to the exact sensation of the kingdom and the miasm and then,
even, if you are very patient, the exact source of the remedy.
AS:
Our materia medica was shaped by decisions about what substances
to prove. Who would have thought club moss would be a major remedy?
Your provings range from Ayahuasca and Anahalonium to rat’s
blood and dinosaur bone. So how do you decide what substances to
prove?
NH: I decide on what substances to prove based
on what I believe has influenced mankind the most in his growth
and development. What man loves and hates, what he uses ritually
and what he fears. It seems that we have a passion for dinosaurs,
having endless movies, books, toys and images of the subject. Yet
we know them by their bones.
We mostly hate rats, yet some absolutely love them and keep them
as pets. Ganesh rides them and so does the goddess. My daughter
Naomi recently went to a rat temple in India where they are worshipped
and given special foods and people walk around barefoot as the rats
run helter-skelter. Ayahuasca is the amazing shamanic combination
of two plants that provides the herbal instrument for a vast number
of people in South America to reach deeper understanding of the
truth of their being. This is done in the context of a church, officially
recognized, called Santo Daime. "Anhalonium is the smallest
of all cacti and has been a major religious and spiritual influence
for Meso-American culture since pre-columbian times." ("Sacred
Plants, Human Voices" by Nancy Herrick). Its true, Lycopodium
is a much used remedy but it is probably not one that I would have
picked to prove. I am glad someone else did!
AS: I have occasionally
met people who self medicated and experienced runaway provings,
which went on a long time and were difficult to stop. Has that ever
been a problem?
NH: I had an experience with the Lotus proving
that was very shocking. Many people had a severe reaction and several
became actively suicidal. This lasted for weeks and it became necessary
to re-prescribe for each of them a constitutional remedy. Also one
prover on Mandragora had a severe and disabling reaction. I always
told my provers to take only one dose of the remedy and then if
NOTHING happened, to take up to three then stop. I do not believe
in taking multiple doses in provings as a routine practice. Each
of these people got better, but if they had taken many doses, I
do not know what would have happened. So the answer is yes, you
can definitely have an adverse reaction to a remedy made worse by
repeating it.
Ironically I have very seldom seen this in practice over 30 years.
I only give one dose and let my patients take home one more dose
to hold onto awaiting further instructions. If the remedy acts then
I let them take 12c as a booster as they need it.
AS: The study of Homeopathy
seems to be moving into deeper levels. Are we learning more about
the universe through homeopathy? If a prover of eagle blood experiences
feelings of flight, or a proving of deer antler leads to images
of running in the forest, what does that suggest about the universe?
NH: We are moving into deeper levels and yes,
I believe that I am learning a great deal more about it through
my work and studies. It suggests that we are one with all. All is
in each of us and a remedy is a stimulus to that remembering.
AS: In England, homeopathy
is under attack and there have been calls to defund the homeopathic
hospitals. Some opponents have agendas, but much is due to plain
misunderstanding of homeopathy. Is there some way to bridge that
gap with the allopathic community? Also, how can we best promote
and protect homeopathy?
NH: We have always felt that the best way is to
work with the allopathic community is with them; not against them.
So we refer to them and they to us. We are finding that more and
more of them especially the young newly trained are more open to
alternatives. We also have many "alternative medicine"
conferences in the US now and docs get continuing medical education
credits for them so they are inspired to learn. Also we are trained
allopathically ourselves which has it's positive and negative sides
but we do understand each other a bit more that way. The personal
connection is always the best way. Our daughter is a medical doctor
now in her second year of residency in Emergency medicine so she
is a big promoter out there in allopathic land.
I have always felt the best way to promote homeopathy is to treat
patients successfully and kindly. This way they sing your praises
to all they know and the word gets around. I also encourage them
to tell their allopathic doctors. Of course if you can't be successful,
at least you can be kind. Research is great and important but no
matter how much research we do, the allopaths continue to quote
that we don't have any. Very frustrating for sure. But they can't
contradict patient after patient coming in and telling them that
homeopathy worked for them, especially if they diagnosed the condition
and have seen it's cure.
AS: In our November interview
with Jeremy Sherr, he said:
“Kingdom is… not the highest
form of homeopathy, it reduces us back to signature”. He
said he prefers to give a remedy from a different kingdom than
what the patient looks like. You and other homeopaths make good
use of kingdom in remedy selection. Is there a misunderstanding
about how this approach is used? What is the most appropriate
way to use it?
(Editor’s note: This is an abbreviated version of his
comment.)
NH: Like cures like!! We don't have a choice to
"prefer....to give ....different than what the patient looks
like". I can't really give what I prefer only what the case
is calling for. This quote is amazing. Are you sure it is accurate?
I and many, many others around the world have had astounding success
using kingdom. It represents the biggest leap in our prescribing
since Kent.
You have to use it with depth and understanding and a deep commitment
to the truth not just a flippant or cursory assessment based on
clothing, appearance or a few choice words. In case after case in
our practice and teaching we show that the kingdom runs deeply thru
the entire case on every level-mental, emotional and physical and
what a delight to see it all come together this way. Then we have
clarity and truth and healing.
AS: What advice would you
give a young homeopath, just starting in practice?
NH: Study each case in depth and use case consultation
with someone you trust. Video your cases so you can study them with
the consultant. Charge a good size fee. Our work is diminished by
people not valuing their training and time and charging too little
for what they do. Keep studying your whole life. Then it lives in
you. Finally teach. Nothing trains you as well as teaching your
own material!
AS: You and Roger are one
of the most celebrated couples in homeopathy. How would you describe
the collaboration between you (a plant) and Roger( a mineral)?
NH: I couldn't teach without my Roger-mineral
doing so much of the incredible computer editing work that is required
now to give a good seminar. Only a mineral has the patience and
fortitude to deal with professional video editing programs! That
said I do believe we complement each other, in that my approach
is so much more feeling tone and non-technical while his is very
point by point analyzed. We do all the power point things, but we
also give the students the in-depth feeling of the interviews and
remedies in the cases. Mostly, if you put the two of us together
we have 60+ years of experience and lots of great cases. We also
have a lot of fun with teaching
AS: What accomplishment
are you most proud of?
NH: Our beautiful and very conscious daughter,
Naomi, who is the kindest person I know.
AS: Thank you so much for
sharing with us today.
-----------------------------
Nancy Herrick was involved in the creation of
the Hahnemann Medical Clinic and the Hahnemann College of Homeopathy.
She studied with many people including George Vithoulkas and Rajan
Sankaran. Nancy is one of the world’s most sought after homeopaths
and lectures in Europe, America, Australia, New Zealand and India.
She has taken part in developing a number of new plant and animal
remedies. Her publications include Animal Mind, Human Voices and
Sacred Plants, Human Voices.
# # # |