| What does
love for animals imply as a symptom? A love for all forms of life,
including animals, could be seen as a sign of good health; but when
it becomes a symptom, something pathological, then of necessity
it implies a lack of balance. As a symptom, it must state that other
species have in some way become a substitute for the self and/or
other members of the same species – that people whose love
for animals has become excessive are unable to give love to, or
receive love from, themselves and other humans.
The lack of health inherent in the expression as a symptom can
often be seen – people who love animals to excess often treat
them with an apparent lack of true respect for the animal’s
own nature and needs. But the expression is centuries old. Old enough
for (particularly Western) societies to have ‘created’
many subspecies of animals who have themselves lost almost all connection
with their wild ancestors and an independent mode of living. They
are as inextricably bound up with us as we are with them. Their
very existence is dependent on their relationship with us –
they collude wholeheartedly in our delusion. Our pets are anthropomorphised,
treated as a substitute for human infants, controlled, caged. (No
wonder that cancer is so rife in domesticated animals.) Their naked
dependency on their ‘owner’ will, no matter how unconsciously,
satisfy some aspect of the ‘owner’s’ inner needs;
whether this is a manifestation of a deficiency of self-worth, a
profound need to express love and care, a desire for unchallenging
and uncomplaining companionship, an over-identification with (literally!)
the underdog, or, more insidiously, to redress an inner feeling
of powerlessness in the face of the rest of seemingly powerful humanity.
The symptom is complex and there may be many issues and many polarities
underlying its expression. Predominantly, however, it would appear
to be linked to solar plexus (worth/self-worth) and heart (love/self-love)
chakra issues which are both, of themselves, intimately connected.
Intolerance of milk is a fundamental expression of difficulties
in the meeting of basic needs – solar plexus issues –
and all the four remedies in this differentiation appear in the
rubric GENERALITIES; FOOD and drinks, milk, aversion. The solar
plexus chakra also relates to the ego. According to many esoteric
viewpoints, it is the acquisition of ego which differentiates us
from animals. Imbalances in the solar plexus chakra can therefore
lead to confusion in our relationship to the animal in us, projected
onto the environment in our relationship with animals. If this idea
has substance, we would expect to find evidence in the four remedy
pictures of the polarity of love of animals. Carcinosin, Natrum
muriaticum and Phosphorus appear in FEAR, animals, of, and, if Sankaran’s
Aethusa case is taken into account (see below), the polarity is
also manifest in this remedy. (Of the other remedies that appear
in the rubric LOVE, animals, for, Medorrhinum and Sulphur also appear
in FEAR, animals, of, while Calc-phos has dreams of animals. Nuphar
luteum – a very small proving of only 201 rubrics –
has only love and great sympathy for suffering animals, while Psorinum
appears only in love for animals. Sulphur and Calc-phos have aversion
to milk and Psorinum has aggravation from milk. Medorrhinum and
Nuphar have no symptoms in connection with milk.)
ÆTHUSA
Aethusa cynapium (Fools Parsley, False Parsley, Dog’s
Parsley, Lesser Hemlock, Dog Poison, Cow Parsley, Devil’s
Wand, Kelk, Lace Curtains, Pig Dock) is a member of the family Umbelliferæ
and a close relative of Conium maculatum, Cicuta virosa , Oenanthe
crocata, Petroselinum sativum and Asafœtida. According to many
sources, it has frequently been confused with other members of this
family, particularly the more virulent Conium, Cicuta and Oenanthe.
Umbelliferæ are quite difficult to tell apart – some
of the common names are shared by several species: Cow Parsley,
for instance, is more commonly applied to Anthriscus sylvestris.
Kelk is a term applied to all umbelliferous plants describing the
hollow stems. Consequently there is some disagreement over the symptoms
which have been attributed to its poisoning, more recent authorities
describing it as relatively innocuous in its effects.
It features in the rubric MIND; LOVE, animals, for as a clinical
addition by George Vithoulkas. The original proving and all clinical
descriptions of the remedy’s action prior to the latter part
of this century do not bring out this aspect of the remedy. The
proving features only delusions of seeing animals (dogs, cats, rats,
mice, insects). The only other reference I could find to the remedy’s
connection with animals is in an Aethusa case cited by Sankaran
in which the patient has a pronounced fear of dogs (Sankaran, 1994.
p48-49). Vithoulkas characterises the Aethusa patient as being reserved
and self-contained but with strong inward emotions. They are individuals
who feel apart. They talk to themselves and to animals. He describes
them as ‘crazy for animals, cats and dogs, etc – look
after them with unnatural passion’ (Vithoulkas, p1). Morrison
states ‘Devotes entire life to animals and becomes intensely
attached to his pets. Collects pets in great numbers’ (Morrison).
Aethusa appears in the rubrics:
MIND; DELUSIONS, imaginations; animals, of
cats, sees
dogs; sees
insects; sees
mice, sees
mice, sees; running from under a chair
rats, mice, insects, etc.
rats, mice, insects, etc.; running; across the room
MIND; LOVE; animals, for
MIND; SYMPATHETIC, compassionate; animals; only for
The remedy is known mostly for a mental state of idiocy, characteristic
epileptic convulsions, and a complete intolerance of milk, particularly
in cholera infantum.
The intolerance of milk underlines the solar plexus connection
to the seat of the problem. This seems to be the key to understanding
Aethusa’s presence in this rubric. The degradation of mental
faculties evidenced in the proving, and the lack of identification
with other humans apparent in the feeling of being apart from the
human race lead to the supposition that individuals exhibiting Aethusa
pathology are somehow stuck in a more animal state of existence,
and hence fear, but identify more with, animals than humans. Their
hold on their ego and higher mental faculties is very fragile: rubrics
such as MIND; FEAR, sleep, close the eyes lest he should never wake,
to, and the tendency towards epileptic convulsions highlight this.
Confirmation for the theory is found in the sensations as if …
symptoms of the remedy. Reference to both Roberts and Ward give
the following:
Bending backward would better pain in small of back
A feeling as if pain in the back would be ameliorated by straightening
out
Feeling as if the stomach were turned upside down
Long, tongue were too
Shortened, arms were
Head was thrown back as if to relieve slight stiffness of the
muscles of the neck
On sewing, feeling in left thumb as if it were stiff and immovable,
and as if she could not extend it
Salivation, as copious as if from mercurial treatment
The skin of the hands dry and shrunken as if they had been washed
in lye, especially on the palmar surface
Many of the above become understandable if it is imagined that
an animal, which walks on four legs, were forced to walk on two
legs as a human. There are many symptoms of back pain in the lumbar
region (which is the main focus of the spinal changes undergone
in moving from a quadripedal to bipedal mode of locomotion) ameliorated
by assuming a more quadripedal configuration in the spine (arching
backward). Throwing the head back to relieve muscular stiffness
also puts the head into the same relationship with the spine as
would be found in a quadriped. The sensation of the palmar surface
of the hands being dry and shrunken hints at the pads of an animal’s
paws. The symptom of the thumb is especially interesting, given
that only other primates have the ability to use the thumb –
dogs, for instance, have a vestigial thumb in the shape of a dew
claw over which they have no voluntary control. Dogs have much longer
tongues than humans and tend to salivate to a much greater extent.
The qualities of devotion and attachment which Vithoulkas and Morrison
describe Aethusa patients as exhibiting towards their pets are also
dog-like, as is the tendency to have many pets since dogs are pack
animals. In this context it is interesting that the common names
of the remedy include Dog’s Parsley and Dog Poison.
Aethusa’s presence in the rubric LOVE, animals, for therefore
seems to relate to a loss of, or failure to develop, ego, resulting
in a partial energetic regression to a dog-like animal state where
the individual literally identifies more with animals than humans.
CARCINOSIN
As a nosode prepared from the results of disease process, Carcinosin
epitomises a failure in the process of differentiation – cancerous
cells do not know what it is they should be. They have lost their
place, their role, in life. They obey the imperative to grow but
are unaware of their correct function in the scheme of things, which
is that of taking their place in the society of cells and organ
systems which together constitute a properly functioning human being.
If this symptom manifests within the microcosm of the individual,
then it can also be assumed to be operating within the macrocosmic
environment – the individual as a unit is also unaware of,
or unable to assume, their correct place and function within their
society. It is a disease particularly of Western society where there
is little tolerance for failure to conform to an idealised image
of a model citizen, where individual variation is barely acknowledged
and the mechanistic model prevails. Our dominant model of health
assumes that all bodies behave in the same manner and conform to
a narrow range of responses around a perceived ‘norm’.
Interestingly, cancer is also a disease prevalent among domesticated
animals, though not their wild cousins.
The symptoms of Carcinosin echo many of those of Aethusa. Aversion
to milk is found, indicating that the basic needs of the individual
are not being met. Constriction around the heart hints at an inability
to give and receive love. There are many respiratory symptoms –
thoracic oppression with a desire for deep inspiration, asthma;
again reflecting an inability to take in the essentials for life,
to meet basic needs.
In relation to animals, Carcinosin appears in the rubrics:
MIND; DREAMS; animals, of
snakes
MIND; FEAR; animals, of
dogs, of
frogs
snakes, of
spiders, of
MIND; LOVE; animals, for
MIND; SYMPATHETIC, compassionate; animals; only for
Again there is the polarity between love and compassion for animals,
and fear of animals, highlighting an imbalance in relation to the
internal animal.
The particular expression of Carcinosin relates very strongly to
feelings of self-worth. The ætiology of the remedy is often
cited as arising from prolonged oppression and subjugation to either
individual(s) or ideals (MIND; AILMENTS from, domination by others,
a long history of). Individuals needing Carcinosin are not able
to be who they are, but have to be someone else. Their perception
of their role is confused and ultimately they succeed in being neither
what they are or what others desire them to be (MIND; DELUSIONS,
imaginations, body, body parts, arms, belong to her, do not; feet,
belong to her, do not; hand, belong to her, do not; martyrdom, of;
protection, defence, has no; separated, world, from the, that he
is; superhuman control, is under; DREAMS, looking for someone and
failing to find him; HOMESICKNESS, nostalgia; IMPRESSIONABLE, susceptible).
In this context the fear of animals evident in the remedy can be
understood in terms of the fear of the animal inside – animal
instincts are wild, basic, not subject to the intervention of conscious
control, and would result in disapproval if given free rein. Dogs,
in particular, represent a manifestation of a very masculine and
threatening energy and seem to me to strongly reflect the father
(ie. male archetype) issues identified by Smits in connection with
the remedy (Smits, 1998). The domesticated dog’s nature has
much in common with the Carcinosin state, which is also seen very
clearly in the mental picture of Lac caninum. We have a term ‘underdog’
meaning the dog that gets the worst of it in a fight; anyone in
adversity; a person dominated, or being or likely to be beaten,
by another. Carcinosin is often the underdog, or takes the side
of the underdog in attempting to mediate in disputes between others.
Fear of frogs seems less obvious as the frog (unlike snakes and
spiders) is not threatening, but a quick glance in the direction
of a close relative, Bufo, might give some clues: Bufo is stuck
in a childish mental state and represents the baser instincts. From
this we could extrapolate fear of base instincts (again the wild,
uncontrollable self) and perhaps also fear of transcending that
state in the direction of ego development, since Carcinosin feels
that their ego is unacceptable to others.
The individual can also exhibit the polarity and relate to the
suppressed inner animal in the form of a projection onto the environment,
hence SYMPATHETIC, compassionate, animals, only for. Other expressions
of the more instinctual, animalistic side of their nature appear
in such symptoms as MIND; ARTISTIC, aptitude; CLAIRVOYANCE; DANCING,
desire for; MIND, DREAMS, devils; FEAR, dark; ghosts, of; MUSIC,
desires; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SUPERSTITIOUS.
Carcinosin’s presence in the rubric LOVE, animals, for, therefore
relates to a fundamental belief that what they are is unacceptable
to others and that their only path to acceptance lies in complete
suppression of their true nature. Self-suppression attracts external
suppression. Their innate sympathy for their own self (including
the inner animal) is also suppressed and hence projected onto the
external environment (MIND; AFFECTIONATE; ANXIETY, environment,
for; family, about his; health, about, loved persons, of; others,
for; DELUSIONS, imaginations, martyrdom, of; SYMPATHETIC, compassionate;
WEEPING, tearful mood, tendency, hurt, seeing others; sympathy with
others, from).
NATRUM MURIATICUM
Natrum muriaticum appears in the rubrics:
MIND; FEAR; animals, of
birds, of
dogs, of
insects, of
snakes, of
spiders, of
worms, of
MIND; LOVE; animals, for
pet, his
HEAD PAIN; GENERAL; animal fluids, from loss of
GENERALITIES; WOUNDS; bites; poisonous animals, of
It’s keynote symptom is AILMENTS, grief, from, and the centre
of its physical pathology revolves around fluid and salt balance
within the body. The many watery issues highlight the connection
with water as emotion. Nat-mur cannot express emotion (MIND; AFFECTION;
demonstrate, cannot; AILMENTS from, anger, vexation, suppressed,
from; grief, sorrow, care, cry, cannot; COMPANY, aversion to, agg.,
alone, amel. when; INTROVERTED; LOOKED at, cannot bear to be; TOUCHED,
aversion of being; VULNERABLE, emotionally) for fear of rejection
and abandonment.
As with the preceding remedies, it has issues with meeting basic
needs, highlighted in the many rubrics it appears in in association
with milk (HEAD; ERUPTIONS, milk crust, crusta lactea; STOMACH;
ERUCTATIONS, General, milk, after; foul; milk, after; NAUSEA; milk,
after; agg.; THIRST; morning; milk, after; VOMITING; milk; milk;
curdled; ABDOMEN; DISTENSION, milk, after; CHEST; MILK, bad; disappearing;
GENERALITIES; FOOD and drinks, milk, agg.; milk; aversion; milk;
aversion; mothers; and finally, milk; desires) focusing on solar
plexus issues and the relationship to the animal within. The focus
of Nat-mur’s problems lies firmly in the area of emotions
– the solar plexus is called the seat of the emotions –
and in this remedy, the link with the heart chakra (unconditional
love) is more apparent. Nat-mur is hurt, vulnerable and eventually
bitter, all expressions of a closed heart chakra (MIND; ANXIETY;
chest, in; heart, region of). Emotions are a cause of great pain:
emotions attack and bite (as does the remedy – it is bold
type in MIND; BITING), they are poisonous, highlighted in the susceptibility
to actual bites of poisonous animals, and making the fears of aggressive
and poisonous animals (dogs, insects, snakes and spiders) understandable.
The fears of birds and worms may express a polarity of a slightly
different nature – Nat-mur is the salt of the earth, it cannot
soar, cannot experience the elation of the intense emotion that
is unconditional love and which equates with flight, it is destined
to crawl around on its belly like a worm, which is too simple a
creature to have emotions.
Since the remedy cannot express emotion to fellow human beings
or accept the emotion within themselves, this is subverted into
relationships with animals, hence the polarity of LOVE, animals,
for, and pet, for his. Animals do not disapprove of emotion; they
receive it gladly or uncritically and do not reject the giver, even
if that emotion is occasionally negative. The need to accept and
love the animal within is projected outward.
PHOSPHORUS
Phosphorus appears in the rubrics:
MIND; DELUSIONS, imaginations; animals, of
insects; sees
rats, mice, insects, etc.
vermin; crawl about, sees
worms; creeping of
MIND; DREAMS; animals, of
biting him
horses
horses; fearing to be bitten by a ferocious black
horses; ugly
insects
insects; stung by
lice
vermin
worms; creeping
MIND; FEAR; animals, of
cockroaches, of
insects, of
rats
spiders, of
MIND; LOVE; animals, for
HEAD PAIN; GENERAL; animal fluids, from loss of
STOMACH; VOMITING; food; animal food, all
The centre of Phosphorus pathology is lack of boundaries.
The individual is wide open rather than closed down and suppressed
like Carcinosin and Nat-mur (MIND; BORROWING of everyone; CLAIRVOYANCE;
CONFUSION of mind, identity, as to his; DELUSIONS, imaginations,
body, body parts, scattered about bed, tossed about to get the pieces
together; images, phantoms, sees; light, incorporeal, immaterial,
he is; IMPRESSIONABLE, susceptible; MAGNETIZED, mesmerism amel.;
SENSES, acute; SENSITIVE, oversensitive, external impressions, to
all; SYMPATHETIC, compassionate; UNDERTAKES, lacks will power to
undertake anything; WILL, loss of; YIELDING disposition).
With the absence of a clearly defined sense of ‘self’,
there will inevitably be the solar plexus issues identified in the
other remedies, but from a different perspective. In a sense, the
Phosphorus relationship to animals has more in common with Aethusa
– there will be an aspect of confusion between ‘own
animal’ and ‘other animal’, hence the large number
of dreams and delusions of animals. The dreams of horses probably
relate to this aspect as the remedy also has URINE; ODOR, horses
urine, like; and GENERALITIES; GLANDERS, a horse disease, indicating
that on some level Phosphorus thinks it is a horse. The predominant
animal forms, however, are those commonly classified as vermin or
parasites and may reflect an underlying sense of vulnerability –
a susceptibility to being taken advantage of – that such a
wide open aspect is likely to attract in the form of its polarity,
hence the fears of these animals as well as dreams and delusions.
In terms of its appearance in the rubric LOVE, animals, for, it
seems likely that, aside from the general sympathetic open nature
of the remedy, Phosphorus identifies with animals in mistake for
the inner animal. Unlike Carcinosin and Nat-mur, the love of animals
is not a displacement symptom but one of confusion due to its lack
of boundaries.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Allen, Timothy F. 1874 (reprinted 1995). The Encyclopedia
of Pure Materia Medica. (12 volumes) B Jain, New Delhi.
Bott, Victor. 1978. Anthroposophical Medicine. Rudolph
Steiner Press, London.
Grieve, M. 1931 (republished 1978). A Modern Herbal. Penguin
Books, Harmondsworth.
Grigson, Geoffrey. 1958 (reprinted 1996). The Englishman’s
Flora. Helicon, Oxford.
Kent, James Tyler. 1905 (reprinted 1990). Lectures on Homœopathic
Materia Medica. B Jain, New Delhi.
Morrison, Roger. Desktop Guide to Keynotes and Confirmatory
Symptoms. Zizia ver 3.1, Kent Homeopathic Associates.
Murphy, Robin. 1995. Lotus Materia Medica. Lotus Star Academy,
Pagosa Springs.
1996. Homeopathic Medical Repertory. 2nd edition. Hahnemann
Academy of North America, Durango.
Page, Christine R. 1994. Frontiers of Health: from Healing
to Wholeness. C W Daniel, Saffron Walden.
Roberts, Herbert A. Sensations as if – Repertory of Subjective
Symptoms. Zizia ver 3.1, Kent Homeopathic Associates.
Sankaran, Rajan. 1994. The Substance of Homœopathy.
Homœopathic Medical Publishers, Bombay.
Vermeulen, Frans. 1994. Concordant Materia Medica. Merlijn
Publishers, Haarlem.
1992. Synoptic Materia Medica. Volume 1. 4th edition. Merlijn
Publishers, Haarlem.
1996. Synoptic Materia Medica. Volume I1. Merlijn Publishers,
Haarlem.
Ward, James William. Unabridged Dictionary of the Sensations ‘As
If’. Zizia ver 3.1, Kent Homeopathic Associates.
van Zandvoort, Roger. 1997. The Complete Repertory. ver
4.5. IRHIS, Leidschendam. |