What makes Heilkunst a complete medical system is its firm
foundation in principles, that is, understanding the laws of
nature and when to apply them, and knowledge of the true
nature of disease - it's duality, hierarchy and jurisdiction
- as well as knowledge of the true nature of the Living
Power (see the main overview article for a full description
of Heilkunst, it's principles and philosophy).
There is more than one assassin plundering the animal kingdom
and more than one knight is required to defend it (a deeper
discussion of each continues below). It is not possible to rely
solely on homeopathy to treat animals; it is by definition
an application of the law of similars, one that removes
secondary (pathic) diseases, according to their symptoms only.
But what of the primary disease cause from which such secondary,
pathic diseases spring?
Veterinary Heilkunst involves removal of the primary cause
(tonic prescribing) and, if needed, any secondary disease
(pathic prescribing) and the restoration of homeostasis
along with therapeutic education for the owner. To create the
chain of wholeness, all these rings must be linked; skip one
and your chain is broken.
Here is how the natural laws apply:
* For the removal of the disease, use the law of similars
* For regimenal imbalance, use the law of opposites
* For therapeutic education, use the law of truth
Every problem must be treated in the proper jurisdiction and
its cause must be removed. For example, to treat an animal that
developed diabetes due to faulty regimen (a carnivore eating
grains, for example), you must correct the regimen. To simply
prescribe remedies according to the symptoms and then leave
the regimen untouched while hoping for the cure would be delusional.
How about treating a diabetic animal that developed symptoms
after losing its owner? While we still have to deal with regimen,
in this case the removal of grief disease will be mandatory.
So the same condition can have different causes and it is the
true physician's duty to uncover and remove that cause.
The treatment of animals carries unique challenges. Causal
prescribing is, I dare say, more vital for animals than humans.
Animals do not describe their symptoms, modalities or aggravations,
so homeopathic prescribing is even more limiting in their case.
Iatrogenic assault is massive, with all the vaccinations, drugs
and chemicals used on a regular basis. It is not surprising
that the development of isodes to deal with such primary diseases
initially took place in the animal sphere, a fact that Dr. Hahnemann
recognized in his writings. It is assumed that Hahnemann was
against the use of isodes, but in reality was only against the
pretensions of Lux and others that this was a different principle
(of equality) rather than simply another form of the application
of the law of similars.
Most importantly, a willing and open-minded owner is necessary
for change to take place. Often, two of the greatest battles
we face as practitioners are persuading the owner to apply the
correct regimen and to use alternative/scientific preventive
care instead of inducing iatrogenic diseases. With those battles
won, we can proceed on the journey towards wholeness.
The First Assassin - Genetic Interference
Tampering with the gene pool is one of the greatest constricting
forces ruining the health of the species.
On the one hand, we have the creation of purebred animals which
required closure of the stud books. Within this closed gene
pool, animals quickly become interrelated. That means that every
weakness becomes multiplied across the spread of generations.
Desired features easily turn into liabilities. It is this meddling
that turns animals into carriers of the miasmic load. In wild
populations, miasms are almost nonexistent.
Another aspect of this problem is that the human decides who
mates with whom. Nature has rules and rituals that bring animals
together; nature also removes from the gene pool those individuals
that are a detriment to the species.
Phenomenologically speaking, this is no different from the
genetic engineering of foodstuffs. All of it is interference
with the God code and there is a price to pay. We see it in
genetic deformities, in loss of health and independence of particular
species and breeds, in their declining ability to procreate
on their own and in the lack of vitality of their offspring.
Diseases stemming from in-breeding are the hardest to remove
(and are sometimes impossible) simply because of manifold physical
changes and because the animal runs out of time before the burden
of multiple generations can be lifted. This assassin appears
immortal, and is certainly out of the reach of a single practitioner
or a single generation.
On the other hand, mutilation of domestic animals takes place
daily in the form of spaying and neutering. Again, it is humans
who are interfering with natural selection, in this case deciding
which animals should be taken out of the gene pool, and those
decisions are certainly not geared to the benefit of the species.
Permanent and untimely removal of important endocrine messengers
distorts and aborts life processes, exposing the animal to multiple
health risks and serious diseases. Since this practice is enshrouded
in political correctness, opinions are freely masqueraded as
facts and remain unchallenged.
For example, it is a wildly accepted opinion that sterilization
prevents cancer. It prevents the cancer of reproductive organs
since without the organs, there can be no cancer. However, it
does multiply the risk of other deadlier cancers, including
quadrupling the risk of bone cancer. It doesn't seem like a
good trade.
Another false belief is that sterilizing young animals prevents
pet overpopulation. First of all, this practice is widely spread
only in North America and the rest of the world still hasn't
been overrun by the pet population.
Secondly, most of the people who sterilize their animals are
single-animal owners and their animals would never have a chance
to procreate anyway. You may have noticed that the infamous
puppy mill owners are not participating in this program.
Thirdly, nature likes to keep the death rate constant. In the
wild, most of the offspring won’t survive into adulthood. With
domestic animals, it is the opposite. Adult pets are dying by
human hand because of human actions: they have behavioral and
physical issues that cause owners to abandon them (whether justified
or not) and many of those issues are a direct consequence of
early sterilization. And the death rate stays constant.
Reproductive hormones play many roles in the organism other
than regulating sexual maturity: they affect cognitive development,
bone formation, closing of the growth plates at the right time,
immune function, cardiovascular function, etc. So everything
from cognitive debility to hip dysplasia to hypothyroidism to
bone cancer is a consequence of early sterilization. For these
reasons, no working dog is ever sterilized before reaching sexual
maturity. Serious training, such as required by seeing eye dogs
is not possible otherwise, physically or mentally.
The best thing an owner can do is leave the animal intact.
That is not always possible, and most rescue animals are sterilized
already. The next best choice is to perform vasectomy or a tubal
litigation instead of fully removing the organs. That would
leave hormones intact while preventing pregnancy. If neuter/spay
surgery is the only option, it should not happen before the
animal reaches sexual maturity.
As practitioners, we have to know the consequences of these
procedures as well as the fact that every surgical intervention
represents a severe shock to the animal that must be removed
through tonic/sequential prescribing.
The Second Assassin - Faulty Regimen
In times older than these, inner wisdom guided the choices.
This wasn't a very difficult job, as only natural choices existed.
The organism is hardwired to recognize the language of nature,
but the unnatural choices that are offered today leave it stumped
and vulnerable. Nature never predicted the fake, processed and
dead foods that mimic the taste of nutrition, and so she never
equipped living beings with the instinct to recognize and reject
them.
In the wild, animals instinctively stay away from poisonous
plants, but they have no problem eating, and dying from poisoned
kibble. Human beings have a reasoning mind which can learn to
apply the principles of good nutrition and regimen in general,
but animals don't. They are at the complete mercy of their owners.
This assassin plays on that fact and so it is the mind of the
owner that gets tricked and enticed and in the end, the animal
is harmed. We are told by so-called-experts that animals need
every meal to be balanced and that animals prefer to eat the
same food at every meal. They imply that if we love our animals,
then we will do what they say. The uninformed mind at first
feels incompetent, because how does an ordinary person know
what "balanced" is? Then it becomes afraid that the
animal will be harmed if the "expert" advice is not
followed. And then the assassin goes in for the kill - convenience.
The uninformed mind surely falls for this one. The war
over an animal's health is, in reality, the war over the owner's
mind. This assassin tells the mind that it is okay to be dumb.
If an animal eats food with life energy content, it gets life;
if it eats dead food, it gets... well, you know. The life energy
content is dependent on two things:
1. How much life energy was in the plant/animal when the lifeline
was cut off?
2. How was that content preserved?
The instant the plant is picked or animal slaughtered,
the incoming life energy ends. Whatever was there in that instant
will continue to drain away no matter what, but how quickly
it drains depends on the method of preparation, preservation
and on passing time. So obviously, fresh raw food has the most
life energy in it, and that is what the animal would be eating
if left to its own devices.
It is a useful exercise for all owners who trust this assassin
to calculate the life energy content of pet food which has been
processed and just sits in the bag, not spoiling for months
or years, or ever.
The Third Assassin - Allopathic "Preventive" Care
The noble impulse of prevention has been kidnapped, distorted
and trained as an assassin. Conventional vaccination is the
main weapon, but not the only one. It now also includes heartworm
and monthly flea/tick treatments.
Vaccination, like a castle built on quicksand, rests on one
basic false assumption - that injecting multiple disease agents,
along with toxins, has the same effect on the immune system
as overcoming a natural disease. Being nothing more than a misguided
attempt at applying the law of similars, vaccination maims and
kills, as its proponents are ignorant of the fact that the law
of similars in crude form is one of the most dangerous weapons
of all.
Vaccination, like the Trojan Horse, penetrates the defenses
and overtakes the immune system in a stealth attack. The humoral
arm of the immune system, like sleeping soldiers surprised in
the night, panics and fires aimlessly, running without direction.
The trampled generals - the cellular arm of the immune system
- can no longer take control. If the soldiers are killed off,
the animal will develop the disease it was vaccinated for; if
they survive, they will continue to fire antibodies and chase
after the enemy, and in the process, destroy the very land that
gives them life. The chase is futile, the enemy securely hidden
within the tissues and organs as a permanent invader, and so
the autoimmune disease begins. There is one more option - the
surprised immune army, knowing that the battle is lost, self-destructs.
We call that anaphylactic shock.
As if vaccination isn't bad enough, the animal is also fed
and dowsed with nerve poisons to keep various parasites away
or to kill them outright. You know what? The organism can only
take so much. Using his Table of Homotoxicology, Dr. Reckeweg
has illustrated the process by which toxins overwhelm the system.
Initially, the organism deals with toxins through the regular
paths of excretion. Once these pathways become overwhelmed,
or cannot be employed, the organism will resort to inflammation.
If inflammation is suppressed, the deposition phase will begin
within the extra-cellular spaces. Next, the toxins will begin
to infiltrate the cells, to degenerate tissues and induce neoplasm.
This process is called progressive vicariation. Once the cell
impregnation has begun, the prognosis is dubious; that is when
the biological divide has been crossed, from relative health
into disease processes. Inflammation is the last truly healthy
response of the organism and we must always strive to return
the patient to it.
The allopathic so-called preventive care is the very agent
that pushes the organism into progressive vicariation and across
the biological divide of Dr. Reckeweg’s homotoxicological map,
into a state of permanent weakness and agitation. This is the
practice of inducing iatrogenic shocks, pumping in the toxins
while never taking them out, trusting the body's natural healing
process while at the same time suppressing the healthy inflammatory
reaction (fevers), the main component of that healing process.
Of all the assassins of health, this one is the boldest and
craftiest of all, claiming its actions are indeed for the greater
health of animals, but instead this health is blocked at every
turn, hampered in its actions and abandoned to its own devices.
Dr. Hahnemann admitted to a certain hopelessness when
it came to patients who have been drugged by allopaths. Today,
thanks to isodes, we can remove the generative shock of allopathic
treatments and thanks to homotoxicology, we can reverse much,
if not all, of the cellular damage. But to be truly successful,
the allopathic assaults must stop.
And the rescue team?
The First Knight - Therapeutic Regimen
He watches over sleep, hydration, exercise and nutrition. There
isn't much argument over the need for good sleep, fresh living
water and adequate exercise. But the wisdom of correct nutrition
has been veiled. Instead of lifting the veil, the ignorant have
turned to the assassin who promised convenience and profit,
the same one who told them that they can continue to be ignorant
because he knows best. They trust him over Mother Nature and
over their own innate wisdom. The first knight fights for one
thing and one thing only - the right action. Not the convenient
action, not the one based in ignorance, but the right action,
for the love of animals.
There are only two questions to ask when it comes to the correct
nutrition:
1. What is the evolutionary diet for this species?
2. How much life energy is contained in this food?
Answer them correctly and you reclaim the strength of the sustentive
power. This is the power that sustains the animal in health
and recovers it after the removal of disease. This is the Lady
for whom our first knight fights. We know her as The Natural
Healing Power. She can be so powerful, enough to intimidate
approaching disease and enough to make any recovery a breeze.
Without her strength, the removal of disease is in vain, because
who will return the animal to health? Homeostasis is her jurisdiction,
and hers alone.
The Second Knight - Medicine Proper
His Lady is the generative aspect of the Living Power, and
she is his damsel in distress. Penetrated and impregnated by
diseases of all kinds - pathogenic, homogenic, iatrogenic -
she is no longer whole. All she can ever be is creation, but
raped by disease wesens, she births her own destruction. She
is like a harp with stones lodged in her strings; she can not
remove them, so she continues to play, but the harmony is gone
from her song.
It is our second knight who must remove those stones from the
harp. If he did it all at once, her strings might break, so
he does it one by one: the last one first, the first one last.
As he travels with her back through time, easing her burden,
removing her diseases, erasing her scars, she gathers vitality,
and with each stone gone from her strings, becomes more whole.
Sequential treatment is the backbone of the application
of medicine proper. The right remedy in the right potency and
at the right time is its holy trinity. The remedies and diseases
that unfurl across time, pairing up and extinguishing in each
others' embrace, are those of the cause, not of the symptoms.
Variable pathic diseases might arise and sometimes they do have
to be removed, but most of the time they disappear along with
the cause that conceived them.
How do we know where to go, which events comprise the timeline,
since our animals don't speak? Hahnemann told us that nothing
is hidden from the accurately-observing physician. It is our
super-sensible organs that are participating with the patient,
and for them there is no species barrier. The animal's Living
Power leaves clues as it rolls backwards through time and if
we allow that expression to impress itself on our own wesen,
then we know exactly where to go.
With the timeline events treated, the Living Power is then
strong enough to tackle the miasmic load, and the miasms will
line up according to the law of succession of forces as
uncovered by the research of Dr. Elmiger, and expanded on by
Rudi Verspoor and Patty Smith-Verspoor. It is here that we tackle
the first assassin - the burden of generations.
Throughout its entire journey, the animal is supported with
regimen, drainage, detoxification and constitutional prescribing.
The constitution, as Hahnemann stated, is a state of health,
not of disease. Therefore, it is not something to be cured,
but something to be balanced. If we picture the constitution
as a structural foundation then we want to strengthen and maintain
it. Constitutional prescribing does not remove any disease,
but acts to reinforce the living power for healing and health
maintenance purposes. The constitutional remedy provides a healthy
model for the organism to use when there is an imbalance and
to stimulate it to restore balance according to the constitutional
typology.
We can take this one step further and imagine someone hiding
behind the wall, making clay pigeons. That someone is the primary
(tonic, causal) disease and the clay pigeons are the secondary
(pathic) diseases. As long as we let him be, he will keep making
the clay pigeons and we will continue shooting the arrows, without
much success, because a new pigeon will quickly take the place
of an old one, as the cause is still there. But if we banish
the maker from behind that wall, we get to save the arrows and
the clay pigeons stop appearing. That is tonic prescribing -
aim at the deeper, underlying cause. Yes, you may still
have to take down the clay pigeons that remained on the wall,
but those that are unfinished will disappear along with their
maker. And there could be more than one maker... and we have
to banish them all.
Now back to the wall, or in other words, the constitution.
To discern the constitution of an animal, we cannot just transpose
the features of a human. Characteristic features of the species
(first) and of the breed (second) must be subtracted from the
features of the individual animal. For example, "desires
company" is not very relevant in the case of a herd/pack
animal, but if a herd animal is a loner, it would be! "Nervous
and fearful" are applicable to Arsenicum, but also
to every prey animal. "Slow moving and stubborn" may
bring Calcarea to mind, but are you treating a Basset
hound? "Curious" in a ferret doesn't count, neither
does "independent" in a cat, or "desires meat"
in any carnivore. In summary, we do not compare an individual
animal to a human, but to the others of its kind.
The Third Knight - True Immunization
What's in a name? Everything! Diagnosis, remedy and a preventive
must all have the same name. In true science, achieving diagnosis
means knowing the cure. At the same time, the only true prevention
is the remedy which also acts as a cure, as Hahnemann taught
us.
For example, an Arsenicum-like disease needs Arsenicum
for its cure, and Arsenicum will prevent that disease
in another still-healthy patient. Take a moment and consider
allopathic vaccinations. Can they cure a full blown case of
the disease? We could rest our case here.
In Hahnemann's early period, the nosodes weren't well-developed
or well-understood yet, so you will remember that in his
early phase he used Belladonna for the cure and
prevention of scarlet fever, as the nearest pathic remedy. Today,
we would instead use Scarlatinum to treat for the
disease itself, the primary disease, but then possibly use a
more individual remedy for the particular pathic disease that
emerged or remained in the human organism as a result of the
initial tonic or primary disease. This would be true causal
prescribing, as Hahnemann called for. Using only the pathic
(homeopathic) prescribing would work to a degree, but would
leave untouched and latent the original disease, even if there
were no symptoms of its presence. As Hahnemann again underlined,
lack of symptoms is not equivalent to lack of disease(s).
When a remedy is given, it always engenders an artificial disease
in the patient. What happens then depends on whether that patient
is suffering from a similar disease or not. If he is, the artificial
disease (remedy) will annihilate the natural disease. But if
he isn't, it is the sustentive power that must arouse itself
to overcome this artificial disease. Being artificial, the disease
will depart on its own anyway, but in this process of engenderment
and arousal, the Living Power gets to know and remember this
particular disease - the energetic signature. So when it meets
it in person, in its natural state, it will simply say: "I
know who you are, and we are not going to tango."
And we all know that it takes two to tango. That is immunization
at its finest - gentle, subtle and powerful. Disease must first
penetrate the etheric body and this is where such gentle defense
takes place. This is what empowers the cellular immunity...
those generals, the masterminds of defense.
With annual and semi-annual vaccination assaults on our animals,
we must educate owners, and offer a safer and more effective
alternative to this barbaric practice. This is our most gracious
knight, the true poet of medicine because the true master is
not the one who wins the fight, it's the one who stops it before
it begins.
The Ruler
There is one being who holds power over the assassins and over
the knights. The one being who can banish the assassins and
put the treasure in the hands of the noble knights is an educated
owner. Ignorance is what allows assassins to rob the kingdom
blind. Ignorance is what leaves a vacuum that assassins fill
with false beliefs. True knowledge stops the war. When the veil
of ignorance is lifted, the assassins have nowhere to hide.
The ruler's choice and power is what all three assassins have
in common. There are plenty of things and events that can endanger
the health of animals: natural diseases, disasters, accidents,
emotional shocks, etc. But these three are a matter of choice.
Humans decide what domestic animals eat, where they sleep, how
much they exercise, whether they step outside or not, whether
they get vaccinated, and who treats them when they are sick.
That is why we call them assassins - they are deceitful. The
only power they have is the power bestowed on them by people,
and the same people can take it away. The ruler who doesn't
know his power is no ruler at all.
The Advisor
Therapeutic education of the owner may be the most important
role of a physician. When we treat the animals, we remove their
traumas. When we educate the owners, we help prevent those traumas
from happening.
The ruler may be well-meaning, but misinformed. He may be willing
to seek the truth, but not know where to seek it. He may desire
to do the right things, but still fear the assassins.
An animal is certainly not an island. Whether we are looking
at a disease or at a behavior, we must immediately look at the
owner. Many behavioral characteristics are a direct reflection
of rules, boundaries and the state of mind of the owner. Diseases
present in the owner almost inevitably become present in the
animal. As astral, soulful beings, animals are an embodiment
of feeling; lacking the upper ego, they cannot willfully set
the personal boundaries. In other words, they can't choose not
to participate with their owners. We may compare an animal to
a kidney, filtering everything that goes on in the household
- everything that evokes a feeling. An owner who is willing
to recognize this responsibility and be treated along with his/her
animal, brings health more quickly to both of them. An owner
who isn't willing or able to do this may become the permanent
obstacle to cure for the animal.
The physician must become the artful advisor who leads the
owner to the place of responsibility without inducing either
guilt or blame. The physician must bear witness to the truth,
so the ruler may bestow power on the knights, so the treasure
may be preserved.
Aude sapere.