| Practical Applications
CONCEPTS – QUINTESSENCES
All
concepts stand or fall with their ease of understanding and consequent
adherence to laws and principles, because events follow cyclical
patterns. Many cycles consist of four or six units, such as seasons
in the four climate bands that circle the earth or the seasons that
may prevail in some of them.
We know from the fact these cycles of four exist, that a fifth
– the originating intelligence – needs to be added to
the equation. However, this is not the type of quintessence we speak
about here.
Here we speak about quintessence’s that can be expressed
easiest in five short, terse aphorisms, which by themselves depict
truths about the scientific idea they convey and which together
explain the entire concept in broad lines. We will meet many of
them in these pages regarding diseases, elementary substances, elemental
concepts and in the application of the Law of Similars. In this
chapter we will give a few of them.
For practical application we have set up this section from the
point of view that plant communities form close-knit relationships
between all the members.
1.
It begins above the surface, with the climate and the weather. Below
the surface in the soil we have a fauna and flora, consisting of
many billions of living entities which all influence plant life.
2. These include the micro and macro nutrients, the fungi, both
of protective and antagonistic perspective such as rusts, slimes,
moulds and the like, the subsoil parasites and beneficial animals,
the bacteria and viruses and finally the allelopathic chemicals,
which help suppress weeds, provide for pest and disease protection
and function as stress regulators determining seeding, growth and
flowering as well as fruit, nut or seed production.
3. Above ground we have the direct protective and antagonistic plants
or companions and weeds, the insects, both beneficial and antagonistic,
such as pollinators predators and pests, We also include a section
on injuries and the pollution of soil, water and air, which with
the appropriate remedies may be alleviated when crops grow on contaminated
soils or in heavily polluted areas.
4. Each plant is an expression of the consciousness we experience
after partaking of the remedy derived from it. It has its particular
mentality and emotional life and is as such a sick individual, specifically
in the artificial environment we have created for it. Hence its
relationships tend to follow those as expressed in the material
medica and what is not there, we can discover by studying the relevant
literature.
5.
From the material medica we can learn about relationships in communities
of plants and the elements they partake of during their life, known
from agricultural literature, while from research in allelochemicals
and their actions on plant life, much can be learned and deduced
about how everything is connected. Even a simple herbal can teach
much about relationships between remedies in the garden and in material
medica.
These are the quintessential points this book hopes to explain
with examples from practice and experience. Throughout these pages,
the reader will come across more of these quintessential concepts
and they form the basis on which the entire edifice is built. If
we observe nature, we see that 5 elements form the engineering structure
of all life and these are:
1. Helium, which is the male/female principle or Aether.
2. Oxygen, Air we all need to breathe.
3. Hydrogen, Water we must drink and of which 70% of the body consists.
4. Iron, Fire of digestion and oxidation, providing energy.
5. Silicon, Earth, the building blocks like bones, teeth hair and
nails and finally the skin.
This is exactly as the ancients saw it and confirmed by daily
life. Elsewhere we have extended somewhat more on these principles
and need not explain further here.
Here also the quintessential is of prime importance in understanding
the problems faced in agriculture, although to the superficial observer
they have little or nothing to do with each other. Quintessentials
have in common that they express the same type of principle in a
concise and terse manner, which leaves little to the imagination
and everything to careful observation.
Another quintessence that comes up frequently is the one on the
Law of Similars, on which this entire work is based. It follows
the adage that what happens in nature must be imitated by man according
to the following five Rules.
1. Like produces like. Monkeys don’t give birth to humans.
2. Like is attracted by like. Monkeys have sex with monkeys.
3. Like is imitated by like. Monkeys have as much sex as some humans
and humans often try to have more.
4. Like is neutralised by like. Try making love to a monkey.
5. Like is cured by like. Better stick to your own kind.
Societies of plants seek each other, but they also seek man, because
like attracts like – what is in the same vibration of consciousness
will invariably seek each other and find them too. The domestication
of plants is a logical outcome of man collecting himself around
wild grains, which he then began to grow to feed ever-more mouths.
Just as grains grow around man, man grows around grains.
It is also often said that the weed that grows abundantly in the
garden of a sick man will be his medicine, from which we can learn
that plants are attracted by similarities in consciousness and mentality
for their favourite places of growth. A little anecdote from my
case-books will illustrate this perfectly.
I
once had a Scottish friend, who had relations with one of the biggest
dope dealers in the vicinity. This man was a rough type, who drank
whiskey like water and smoked joints like a chimney. He was rough
in the mouth and had the raspiest voice I ever heard. He had a problem
– he had an eczema that itched him no end. Could I help him?
Sure, why not? Better than the priest who condemns the sinner,
the doctor treats friend and foe – he does not ask how one
make one’s income. He asks what type of work he does. When
the answer is import export, the doctor may know exactly what is
meant. On arrival at the man’s house I saw the yard was overgrown
with nettles. I said nothing, but went inside, where the roughneck
was drinking whiskey and trying to order his wife around. The living
room was huge and a fire burning in the open fireplace, to which
the host had stretched his feet and was busily scratching himself
voluptuously. His
wife asked what I could do for him. So I told her he should get
a flogging with nettles, to get rid of his itch. At that he pulled
out a gun and told me he’d shoot off my head if I so much
as even thought about it. I told him I had a present for him and
handed him a few bottles of Glenfiddich, his favourite malt. So
we fed him so drunk, he passed out and slid from his crapaud on
the floor and was unconscious. Then we went into the garden wearing
rubber gloves and cut many bunches of nettles. These we brought
inside, then stripped the fellow and flogged him with the nettles
till he was swollen and red. We covered him with a blanket and let
him get out of his booze. Then I left for the night with my friend
to his place and the next day back home.
The next day he called and even his voice was smoother. He had
lost the desire to brag and swear and told me his skin was as smooth
as a baby’s. If I could come by to get my pay. I told him
I did not require to have my head blown off with a big sawn-off
shotgun. He told me it was a joke and please come – he is
embarrassed by his threat and needs to show his gratitude. Even
his wife had asked me to come by. I told him I would be back in
six weeks. When I came back, I visited him again. The garden was
almost free of nettles. I asked him whether he had cut them down.
“No” he says, they had gone by themselves. He had two
more flogs by his wife and then by the second time they were almost
gone. His wife told me he was much nicer and softer now and his
business was booming. Even she had changed, and was much more relaxed.
That consciousness left the man and the nettles left with it.
Our hunger for food keeps our relationship with the plants reasonably
intact, insofar as we respond to its need for nutrients in one form
or another. The preferred method is to apply a massive dose of nutrients
at once, in a form that is but slowly dissolved in water, thus appearing
to keep nutrient levels fairly constant. In nature this never happens,
because natural systems are always in flux. Soil is moreover more
than a medium to support plants and to suspend nutrients in, it
has to be adequate to the degree of development, which is also in
constant flux. To favour one type or even a mix of nutrients over
others to enhance development, comes at the cost of many drawbacks,
such as pest and disease susceptibility or pest and disease-promoting
circumstances. Such one-sided junk food may seem to promote health,
but produces instead weak obese plants prone to all kinds of problems
such as diseases, retarded or accelerated blooming and fruit setting,
without taking into account the ultimate readiness of the crop.
The result is a watery taste, without the necessary aromas and subtle
sensations that organically grown food gives to the palate.
With homoeopathy, the taste of everything you grow will greatly
improve, because the necessary balance underground is equally dependent
on that remedy for its complete development. A remedy to control
nematodes will act like it is supposed to, because the plant does
that in its daily life. Nematicides, even from so-called biological
sources, see the nematode as the problem that must be killed, while
we (homeopaths) see the nematode as the result of an unbalanced
pattern of life. It can be reinforced by the imitation of a natural
pattern that is balanced and provides optimum control of all elements
in the crop cycle, without adding poisons to the environment. Then
the nematode will go its way without attacking our crops, because
the remedy has put the plant in an invulnerable position.
ELEMENTARY, MY DEAR WATSON!
Four elements are needed by all living entities – earth,
fire, water and air. Another way of explaining that the views of
the Middle Ages were not as superstitious as most scientists want
us to believe is found in the following:
It is interesting and for practical purposes very important, that
more than ninety-five percent of the universe consists of the following
very few elements.
First
of all, the spectroscopy of the universe shows that helium is exceptionally
abundant. It is widely distributed. Helium is nothing more than
the primordial positive and negative electrons tied together, or
in the process of being tied.
Secondly, the same spectroscopy shows that helium is enormously
prevalent and everywhere present, although it does not combine with
anything and is almost the lightest of the elements. It does not
even combine with itself. The earth has retained little of it. If
you however look at the radioactive elements and the alpha particle
given off by them, you discover it is nothing but helium. Therefore,
it must have a particular prevalence, even on earth, for it is part
of the structure of the heavy elements.
Thirdly, Hydrogen is the next abundant element, which forms water
with the next – oxygen. The spectral lines we see in the heavens
are caused by hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen. Oxygen constitutes
fifty-five percent of the earth's crust and it has about the same
proportion in meteorites. Oxygen and nitrogen have nearly the same
atomic weight. For the purpose of this explanation, we shall regard
them as one. Between oxygen and helium, there are no abundant elements,
and you should note this. True, carbon has some prevalence, but
having almost the same atomic number, we could say it is a satellite
to oxygen.
Fourthly and lastly, we see that nearly all the meteorites consist
of oxygen, well over fifty percent; magnesium, at thirteen percent;
silicon, fifteen percent and iron, at thirteen percent. Three quarters
of the crust is composed of three elements – oxygen at fifty-five
percent, silicon at sixteen percent and aluminium at five percent.
The others do not have more than two percent each. Iron, supposedly
abundant in the core, has one and a half percent.
Aluminium, silicon and magnesium have similar atomic weights, so
we give them combined the name silicon, which after all, is the
peak of the period, falling in group five. Between oxygen and silicon
and between silicon and iron, there are no abundant elements. Iron
has an atomic weight of fifty-six.
Now from the point of view of an engineer, the universe is made
up of positive and negative electrons; helium and four elements
built out of them, oxygen, hydrogen, silicon and iron. Differently
expressed, they are aether, air, water, earth and fire, exactly
as the ancients described it and which we regard as superstition.
Besides, the ancient Greeks knew all about those elements. Here
is a quote.
“And they allowed Apollonius to ask questions and he asked
them of what they thought the cosmos was composed. But they replied:
"Of elements."
"Are there then four" he asked.
"Not four," said Iarchas, "but five."
"And how can there be a fifth," said Apollonius,”
alongside of water, air, earth and fire ?"
"There is the ether", replied the other, "which we
must regard as the stuff of which gods are made, for just as all
mortal creatures inhale the air, so do immortal and divine natures
inhale the ether."

(Mahavisnu)
Apollonius again asked which was the first of the
elements, and Iarchas answered:
"All are simultaneous, for a living creature is not born bit
by bit."
"Am I," said Apollonius, "to regard the universe
as a living creature?"
"Yes," said the other, "if you have a sound knowledge
of it, for it engenders all living things."
(‘The Life of Apollonius of Tyana’, Philostratus, 220AD).
What is more, others also are of the same mind – as is due
to great minds, according to the saying.
'For a truly joyful and auspicious human work to flourish, must
man have the capacity to climb from the depths of his attachment
at home up to the ether. Ether here stands for the high flight of
the high heavens, the open realm of the spirit.'
(Martin Heidegger, 'Treatise on human thought')
For plants this is the essential – hydrogen; water –
oxygen; air – silica; earth – iron: fire.
What else is fire but oxidation? What else is earth but construction
and glue? What else is air but respiration and breath? What else
is water, but food and drink? So we trace back the need for nutrients
to these four elements. The fifth is the commanding force, so to
speak, from where all ideas come forth, either as remembrance from
previous existence or obtained by talent.
1. General Remedies
In this Chapter we discuss the remedies that are important to all
plants. In the plant world, some elemental substances are essential
to all plants. First we discuss the essential components of these
subsoil events.
1. Micronutrients and Macronutrients and their associated remedies,
all from the subsoil area.
2. Fungi, also from the subsoil area.
3. Bacteria and bacilli, having the same source.
4. Viruses also from the soil.
5. Allelochemicals, coming from plant roots.
Another
quintessential relation has been established and the consequences
are equally far reaching. For they indicate a quintessential set
of influences, which may consist of many different species and in
very large numbers, which can be controlled by these very same substances.
The relationship between these remedies is explained as producing
similar phenomena, because they live under similar circumstances,
although they may react to allelochemicals differently than our
crop. What is related in nature always seeks each other and so we
see that plant societies are formed, in which similar states of
mind are grouped together. After all, similar plants grow on similar
soils and have their friendships and enmities, just like humans.
We have seen that certain plants growing on acidic soils have cravings
for certain elements, which are moreover hard to get – those
of the alkaline type. Hence these relationships between soils, elements,
plant communities and allelochemicals is reflected by similarity
in the relationship between remedies.
To
further work out how these remedies are related we have to consider
the fact that nearly all plants require microelements of a particular
class as well as macronutrients of a particular class. As we saw
at the description of the functions of the elemental component,
some are related to growth and others are related to flowering and
fruit setting. These same relations are found in the macronutrients.
Recent research has shown that plants chatter and communicate with
their community when attacked by a disease or pest. We have read
in the introduction about these phenomena and seen that there are
some differences and many similarities with human and animal societies.
These phenomena are important in more than one way. We see certain
remedies with a very pronounced picture first, followed by their
antidotes, and similars. This is reflected in nature, where we see
the nettle and its antidote growing right next to each other. In
agriculture, we should imitate nature, with doses so small as to
elicit a reaction and thus have the best manageable agriculture.
Space age agriculture consists of the manageable use of poisonous
substances as produced in the relationships discovered in nature,
to imitate as much as possible that natural setting. Instead of
unmanageable poisons and an external approach, as is wont in chemical
agriculture, homoeopathy has made those and any other poison manageable,
and because of its extensive knowledge about relationships in nature
is capable of presenting the truly integrated approach to garden
problems.
Some plants are genuine companions while others are antagonistic.
The same counts for elements, insects, fungi and allelochemicals,
which all combine to provide a comprehensive picture of the normal
environment. We proceed from the soil and the elements, next the
companion plants, then come the insects, the soil fungi and the
plant excretions. Each is discussed from the point of view as an
individual remedy first, followed by a paragraph explaining its
place and function within the community of plants. Thus the relations
are explained and enable one to understand the role of each in connection
with the remedy under discussion
Climate Zone
There are basically 4 main climate zones:
1. Arctic, not here under discussion;
2. Moderate,
3. Subtropical and
4. Tropical.
Within these 4 zones, we have many further differences –
A) A coastal climate,
B) An inland climate
C) A land climate
D) A desert climate, each with its own weather type. Within these
different landscapes we may also have
*) Hills,
^) Mountains, where each valley may have different weather at any
one time.
<) River-delta climate.
<<) Moor
~) Savanna
We then follow with the use of the soil below.
~>:P Grazed Savanna
~!!&) mixed culture
!!) Forests
&) Agriculture
We may have a tropical coastal river delta, a 4A< or a 2B*,
a moderate inland hilly landscape. In the first case, we have long
warm summers, with not too much rain and a landscape that is cool
on the hilltops and warm in the valleys. Rivers may modify the moisture
content of the air and soil. It is the latter which determines its
use. If it is also forested it becomes 2B*!!. If there is a mixed
culture it becomes 2B*!!&
The landscape below determines the microclimate at local spots.
A desert with its alkaline soil will not receive rain at all, or
may have seasonal downpours. A highly acidic rainforest jungle receives
abundant water; a neutral agricultural area receives sometimes too
much and at others too little, but generally enough. Dependent on
the soil pH below, the weather will adapt to the local circumstances,
creating microclimates, all within its moderate, subtropical and
tropical climate zones.
We can therefore say that within the 3 climate zones under discussion
here, we have 4further subdivisions and 5 more micro-climatological
concomitants as enumerated above. That makes for 400 plus different
climate and weather conditions we may be confronted with, within
which landscape features may further influence microclimate.
We can imagine to have a 2A* landscape or a 4B!! landscape and
we discover also differences in microclimate, simply because a hilly
coastal landscape has different soil conditions from a tropical
rainforest and thus a different flora, fauna and above all climate.
The tropical rainforest could never grow on those moderate coastal
hills, while most of what grows on these hills would not long survive
or even germinate in that rainforest. We see that each has particular
constraints where it concerns the development of a plant community.
These constraints begin of course with the climate and weather while
also extending into the surrounding vegetation and the subsoil events,
which are not of less importance, but simply less visible to us.
Of course the soil determines the type of plant that will grow
there, but the climate constraint takes care of details that man
likes to forget. Hence we see that Australian plants all have a
leathery feel and are tough, have waxy flowers and do not lose the
leaves at the onset of winter – they are evergreen, while
European deciduous trees have soft leaves, that wilt easily in the
dry climate there, have flowers that stand no longer than two days
in the climate zone and moreover lose their leaves at the moment
they would need them the most – during the wet season, which
is the deciduous tree’s rest period. Although it will grow
and become large, it does not live under conditions that are entirely
conducive to its survival. If shaded by native trees, the heat may
be bearable, because also Australian forests are cooler than the
surrounding land.
Other plants become outright pests when transplanted to places
they do not belong. The blackberry is such a plant in Australia,
where one is obliged to remove it from one’s soil entirely,
because it takes over vast tracts of land. It likes the soil and
weather as if made for it and goes rampant wherever it is not checked.
Lantana is such a pest and we shall meet this tree again when we
discuss the allelochemicals. It fills up empty spaces, but does
not compete with the other members in the forest. But wherever it
has taken hold, it does not leave and slowly but surely takes over
all the other empty spaces that fall into a forest over time, before
any other member has that chance.
We do not advocate such transplants from continent to continent,
nor do we condemn it outright. We urge caution and to first try
out how it grows in an artificial landscape set up in a greenhouse
that resembles the climate and weather you want to transplant in.
It is full of local plants and you simply plant the wanted tree
or other plant in that landscape in the amount normal to make a
living. Then leave it alone and see what happens. If after a few
years your plant starts to take over, do not import the plant there.
If it grows but suffocated, do not transplant this plant –
it will give you no end of trouble. Only when the plant has been
accepted as a normal member of the plant community and does not
die out or take over, can we say we have a successful transplant
candidate.
Climate is therefore more than a simple placement within the three
zones important for the subject under discussion. It requires taking
into account the soil pH and the flora and fauna that populate it,
as well as the particular use that is made of that climate condition.
We shall try to enumerate most climate conditions under which some
crops grow, which may include more than one. Brassicas are grown
all over the world in almost all climate conditions. Wheat is the
grain of moderate climate zones, rice that of the tropical zone,
while maize lies somewhere in between in the subtropical zone.
Climate is, after soil, the next great regulator of available
crops in a particular area at a particular time. Climate is the
regulation and occurrence of the weather over a long period of time.
Within the climate we see the occurrence of extremes, and a cyclic
appearance, as a confirmation of the rule. Climate is what regulates
that cycle of life and carries it through to completion, or in a
freak event destroys large portions of it.
WEATHER TYPE
The weather type is determined mostly by the type of plants that
grow underneath and the proximity to the coast. Both make for a
wet landscape, since trees attract rain like a magnet attracts iron.
We must not forget that a 30 metre high tree processes about 3000
litres of water per day in the summer. Over a forest, millions of
tons of water-vapour are released into the air, making it obviously
cooler. When one passes portions of forest in the landscape on the
road, that difference in temperature is enough to notice for a human
– 5 to 7 degrees cooler in the forest. Cooler air is heavier
than hot and sinks to the ground, making everything cool and thus
of lower pressure. We all know that low pressure on the weather
map means rain.
Over river deltas and moors have a similar situation – massive
amounts of moving or stagnant water, which is cooler than anything
around it and spreading that cooling property along its banks by
osmosis and wind. This lowers the pressure and low pressure brings
rain.
Over a desert on the other hand, we have the opposite situation
– the pressure is always high, due to the absence of any cooling
property. Except at night, when that same absence results in the
rapid cooling of these hot sands and drops the temperature often
below zero and any moisture that may be in the air is instantly
frozen and lies as a film of ice crystals over the sand in the morning
and is gone before the sun is more than a hand above the horizon.
An hour later, it is already 20 degrees. Fifty degrees or higher
by noon is no exception. The Sahara has spots where it soars up
to almost 70 degrees and I do not mean Fahrenheit.
Evidently, over agricultural land we are more dependent on the landscape
itself to enable accurate weather and microclimate predictions.
In river valleys we may expect more rain, but as easily see nothing
of it, except in the hilly and mountainous regions and on the coast.
On the world’s plains grow most of our crops, and here we
have created a zone with almost neutral pH, trying to outwit the
acidity or alkalinity of the soil to grow crops that actually often
require the opposite of the soil we try to grow them in.
Here we have sometimes drought and sometimes floods, while generally
we hope for enough at the right time. The amount of water evaporation
from a crop is substantially less than that from a forest, a reason
to leave trees on pieces of land that are inaccessible and that
border the crop. They have, besides a function in weather conditions
such as forming windbreaks, also an influence on pests and predator
presence and may help to keep weeds off the land.
Weather can make or break the crop and much of what grows around
it. Extreme weather can destroy everything in a very short time.
Generally we can expect reasonably predictable weather patterns
for specific times of the year. This enables us to grow crops to
feed the world. From the integrated viewpoint as described here,
we must understand every part to sensibly grow these crops.
Soil pH
Soils
are extremely diverse in their acidity and composition. The minerals
and particles of their construction, organic matter content and
other components, are particular to each type of soil and hence
their behaviour differs as much.
Moreover, soils differ in their flora and fauna, microbes, fungi,
roots, rhizomes and tubers or bulbs. If we understand everything
that lives in the soil we can understand the needs of the plants
that grow in and above the soil. This makes a piece of soil an individual
piece that is different from all other pieces of soil.
Roughly, we divide soil into acidic, alkaline and neutral pH.
We shall explain how the soil acidity determines the available nutrients
and how certain practices can change the pH of the soil.
The soil pH is important for the plants that grow on it. It expresses
the acidity or alkalinity of a soil. Acid soils have a pH<7 and
alkaline soils have a pH>7. The pH of a mineral soil lies between
3.5 to 8.5. Organic soils may have a lower pH. It is evident that
each requires a particular set of nutrients in a particular consistency.
Certain nutrients are less available while others are more abundant.
When the pH drops below 6, aluminium can occupy a significant portion
of the cation exchange phase of soils, while exchangeable bases
such as Ca2+ Mg2+ K+ Na+ are more dominant at higher soil pH. This
is because the base saturation rate is greater. Soils with a pH
between 8 and 8.5 typically contain calcite. Higher pH levels, such
as >9 can occur in arid areas, where one finds high levels of
salts of the sodium group. These soils are getting extended throughout
the Australian outback, where short sighted people have cut down
the large swathes of forest for gaining new agricultural lands,
because the ones they had cut down already gave harvests only for
a few years.
There is a general trend of decreasing base saturation and increasing
saturation with acidic ions such as Al3+ and H+ as the pH decreases.
The sources of protons that contribute to the decline in soil pH
and increasing soil acidity include atmospheric deposition of acids
such as H2SO4 and NHO3 generated from atmospheric reactions between
water and gaseous NOX and SOX from fossil fuel emissions, H2CO3
produced from aqueous dissolution of atmospheric CO2 or biologically
produced CO2 and biological activity, such as respiration, production
of organic acids, nitrification of mineralised N or ammonium fertilisers
and imbalances in cation and anion uptake by plants. The rate of
soil acidification is related to the rates of acid inputs versus
the soil buffering capacity. Soil pH is mainly buffered by the dissolution
of calcite and other carbonates at a pH >7, cation exchange of
bases by H+ and Al3+ or their hydrolysis species at a pH 7 to 5,
dissolution of Al-bearing minerals at a pH<4. Phytotoxicity of
simple organic acids is most evident in acidic conditions when organic
acids are protonated, meaning neutral in charge and this toxicity
is lost when organic acids are partially dissociated under neutral
and basic conditions or negatively charged.
ACID SOILS
These soils have a high pH, 7.5 or higher. The acidity is expressed
as a scale that runs from 4.5 to 9, whereby 6.5-7 is considered
neutral and the lower alkaline, while the higher depict acidic soils.
They attract oxalate plants and those that like acidic soils, many
of which are weeds. However, many of our crops also like a rather
acidic soil, which is often made more so by the use of swine and
chicken manure. This has an influence on the nutrients, of which
the alkaline may have deficiencies. The nutrients that are alkaline
in nature are harder to obtain than those that work through acids,
such as Nitrogen. Potassium and Calcium salts may also be in short
supply, while the phosphates are all plenty available. Manganese
may be hard to get too, since the acidity hinders its uptake. Liming
is a good method to make acidic soils more neutral in pH. This soil
demands horse manure, for its alkaline qualities. This already tells
us much about the above-ground plants – their shapes, their
functions and their habitat within the plant community.
The acids are all decomposers and destroyers, which does not mean
they are necessarily bad. Many processes cannot take place without
the use of acids, the most important of which is perhaps respiration,
which runs on the Citric acid cycle and has 7 acids in that cycle
to enable uptake of necessary nutrients and processing of carbohydrates
to sugars and proteins.
NEUTRAL PH
A soil with a neutral pH will attract other plants and be better
for different crops than the acidic or alkaline soils. They support
plants that are in need of balanced diets of nutrients and whereby
the excess of one or the other is mostly due to human failure. These
excesses help in the build-up of pest populations. Excess Kali and
Phosphorus always result in aphid population explosions. That what
we do to one part, we do to all parts, is no more obvious than in
this instance. Everything therefore depends on everything else and
each part must be taken into account.
Neutral Ph soils have all nutrients available, but not always
at the right time. This can be manipulated by using the remedies
from the nutrient class or some of the companion plants, which have
great influence over nutrient availability, such as Chamomilla.
Crops may have requirements at other times that can be manipulated
to advantage. Neutral pH is often considered the best soil for growing
crops, but this is also dependent on the consideration of the necessity
for plants to have more acidic or alkaline soils to grow in. In
general though, the notion stands with many crops.
ALKALINE SOILS
Alkaline soils have opposite characteristics to the acidic types.
Here the trouble is not found in the uptake of Phosphorus, Calcium,
Carbon and Kali. More, the acidic nutrients are difficult to get
at and they must be supplied with swine and chicken manure. Horse
manure will here be contraindicated, since it is an alkaline manure.
Plants that like Carbon, Calcium and Kali thrive on these soils
and their predators and pests will be of a different nature. Humidity
may be a problem and so may excessive salts.
Excessive salts are only formed in extremely alkaline soils, such
as a desert biome. A desert biome can however easily be created
by faulty farming practices. Denuding a soil of trees may seem to
be a smart move, but by not adding any organic matter to the soil
it will soon be depleted. A soil is always more than a medium to
grow plants in and suspend nutrients in. A mineral soil has advantages
over an acidic one in the availability of nutrients, but this can
also be a disadvantage, attracting pests for instance.
Acidic nutrients such as nitric acid and decomposition of ammonium
salts to nitrogen may sometimes be problematic. Too little acidity
may cause other problems and the defence against fungi is not well
established. On the other hand, fungi will be less of a problem
in non-acidic soils. Alkaline environments have more problems with
the sodium salts and here the remedies from the Natrium series can
do much to alleviate problems. Phosphorus and magnesium are other
elements that help antidote excessive salination. The problems associated
with salination may be more difficult to remove than those of acidity.
Carbonates are among the best remedies for alkaline soils. Natrum
carbonicum, Calcarea carbonicum, Kali carbinicum and so on all are
important remedies for the alkaline soils. They form part of the
carbon group of remedies, which are all connected with growth and
structure building and through their acids in reduction cycles with
Co and CO2. Carbon dioxide is an important greenhouse gas that is
said to be responsible for climate change. In the introduction we
shall further elucidate on this phenomenon, which we think is due
to other causes and has different solutions, one of which is the
abandonment of fossil fuels as the energy source to drive this planet.
Carbolic acid and many of the phenols and resins from plants and
trees are powerful homoeopathic remedies in agriculture. They are
all carbon based and all partake of construction and maintenance
in the living systems. Carboneum and Carbon itself are also important
remedies for these type of soils. We shall enumerate the different
substances that can be used as remedies and which are derived from
Elemental Carbon. Those we already use have been marked with an
asterik *.
1. * Acetic acid.
2. Acetylsalysilicum acidum.
3. * Ammonium aceticum.
4. * Azadirachta indica.
5. Benzenum.
6. Benzinum
7. Benzinum dinitricum
8. Benzinum nitricum
9. Benzinum petroleum
10. Calcarea acetica
11. * Calcarea carbonica
12. Calcarea lactica
13. Calcarea oxalica
14. * Camphora.
15. * Carbo vegetabilis
16. Carbolicum acidum.
17. Carboneum.
18. Carboneum oxygenisatum
19. Carboneum sulphuratum.
20. * Citricum acidum
21. Cosmolinum.
22. Croton chloralum.
23. Cuprum aceticum.
24. * Eucalyptus
25. * Formicum acidum.
26. * Gallicum acidum.
27. Gaultheria.
28. Keroselinum.
29. Ketoglutaricum acidum
30. * Kreosotum.
31. Kresolum.
32. * Lacticum acidum.
33. * Magnesia acetica.
34. * Manganum aceticum
35. * Mentha piperita
36. Mentholum.
37. Naphta.
38. Naphtalinum.
39. Natrium pyruvicum.
40. * Natrum salicylicum.
41. Oleum Santali.
42. * Oxalicum acidum
43. Paraffinum.
44. Petroleum.
45. Propylaminum.
46. Salicinum.
47. * Salicylicum acidum.
48. Tannicum acidum.
49. * Tartaricum acidum.
50. Terebinthina.
51. Terebinthina chios.
52. Terebinthina laricina
53. Thymol.
54. * Urea pura.
55. Uricum acidum.
From this list we can derive 35 new remedies that are useful in
the treatment of plants, without even considering their intrinsic
qualities and characteristics, because these remedies all are carbon-based
and as such important parts of the structure of the living universe.
They can help us solve the problems associated with growing crops,
although some are fossil-fuel based. Even if we leave those out,
we still have sufficient remedies to choose from. If we consider
these form but a fifth at most of the compounds listed in the homoeopathic
literature, we understand we have many more remedies to choose from.
Although at present little or nothing is known about them for plants,
from the family relationship we can make some predictions, especially
if the individual parts of the compound have been known to homoeopathy
before. While anthropomorphising helps at times, it is not an important
part of the entire picture. We rely more on an alchemical viewpoint
of signature, which is a valid means to arrive at conclusions, because
these conclusions have invariably been confirmed and verified in
practise.
|