| From 1817, a year in which Hahnemann struggled to
defend his ideas about a new therapeutic system -already enunciated
in his principles by Hippocrates, there were references about the
use of homeopathic medicines in Argentina. That year, General San
Martin crossed the mountain range of Los Andes bringing a homeopathic
medicine kit given to him by his friend Don Angel Correa, who had
recently brought it from Europe. This kit would help him to mitigate
the sufferings caused by arthrosis and a gastro duodenal ulcer that
pained him. The brain child of Hahnemann, Homoeopathy, flourished
in Argentina, Spain and other neighbouring countries, nourished
by a true disciple of the Dynamic Healing Art Dr. Alfonso Masi-Elizalde,
one of the great names of contemporary homeopathy, who passed away
on July 23rd, in Buenos Aires, Argentina, at the age of 71.
The Commencement of a Genius
The birth year of Dr. Alfonso Masi-Elizalde was marked by the
establishment of the Sociedad Homeopática Argentina,
the most prestigious institute of Homoeopathy in Argentina, through
the individual efforts of doctors like F. Ortega, A. Dominguez,
M. Fuguerto, P. Segress, Ronces, Burgos, J. Tuati and BenavÃdez.
Years later it adopted the new name of Asociación Médica
Homeopática Argentina, whose president was Dr. Goofed
Jonas.
Dr. Alfonso Masi-Elizalde embarked on homeopathy through an interesting
pedigree within the Unicist homeopathy field. His father, Jorge
Augusto Masi-Elizalde, also a homeopath physician, created, together
with Pablo Paschero, Carlos Fisch and Armando Grosso, a Kentian
group inside the Argentine Homeopathic Medical Association. Dr.
Alfonso Masi-Elizalde worked diligently as Professor in the institution
of Dr. T. Paschero, The Escuela Médica Homeopática
Argentina". Years later {1980} he himself established an institute
to further the teachings of Dr. J. T. Kent and named it Instituto
Internacional de Altos Estudios Homeopáticos James
Tyler Kent.
An Insight of Literary Genius
Dr. Masi nurtured his talent in solitude and developed his character
in the stormy billows of the world. He expressed his thoughts through
the articles he published in Actas del Instituto James T. Kent and
through participation in many congresses and conferences worldwide.
The study groups founded by him (or inspired by him) in several
cities in Argentina, Brazil, Italy, Germany, France, Switzerland
and Spain remain active, generating continuous interest in students
and new generations of homeopaths. His supervision of clinical cases
enlightened and directly benefited hundreds of people. He had been
writing a book for many years, which he intended to give the title
“Confessions of an old Homeopath". Dr. Alfonso
Masi-Elizalde advocated an exegetic review of homeopath books, and
he did this with absolute vigor. Unable to accept both the organicist
and scientificist reductionism, and the excesses of a dogmatic and
non-productive Kentism that did not know how to evolve, he undertook
the task of reviewing the classics and of pointing out the many
episthemologic gaps in the homeopathic corpus. His intensity and
assertive determination in advocating his viewpoints triggered numerous
discussions (some of them healthy, others only disproportionate
reactions) in the audiences he addressed. However, his provocations
had a specific educational purpose. After all, he was an expert
in Maieutics (The Socratic Art Of Teaching Students To Think) and,
using this technique, he urged
students to always challenge their teachers.
Obviously, this active and permanent subversion of the established
order ensured him a huge supply of enemies. However, this only caused
him to keep fighting for a permanent debate. On the other side,
he also left many friends and students, who, oscillating between
disquiet and Angst / anguish saw in these stimuli new prospects
for research.
Philosophy of Dr. Alfonso Masi-Elizalde
Dr. Alfonso Masi-Elizalde had a brilliant conception about the
evolution of a Physician up to the present age. He elaborated that
at one time the Priest & the Physician were one. But gradually
with the change in the time, Theologians* and Thinkers fragmented
man into three separate entities, Mind, Body & Spirit. Each
part of man was allotted a different variety of specialist. The
physician took charge of man's body, the psychiatrist looked after
the sick mind and the third component of man, the spirit, remained,
as before, in the keeping of saints and priests. Thus the great
age of specialization began in this way and ultimately humanity
was torn in the race for specialization.
He substantiated that we live in a scientific age in which it is
assumed that acceptable knowledge has to reach us indirectly through
the gateway of special senses and never directly as Extra-Sensory
Perception coming to us. Accordingly, this age is labelled as Materialistic
& Deterministic. Sense perceptible matter is conceived to be
the source of all, its study is supposed to aid us in acquisition
of knowledge of the fundamental reality of the universe. This mental
bent has urged men to develop the physical sciences and its methodologies
to search for the underlying truth. Pphysical sciences deal with
events and objects, which can be carefully measured & observed.
The knowledge gained can be verified by means of controlled experiments
capable of being repeated by others under more or less similar conditions.
Thus, modern scientific medicine, which draws its inspiration from
the physical sciences, appears to be concerned with those part &
phenomena, which are amenable to mathematical calculation and exactitude.
However, being a healer of dynamic philosophy he validated that
the homoeopathic school of medicine follows a unitary or holistic
method in therapeutics. A homoeopathic practitioner draws a complete
picture of the sickness of a diseased individual, who is out of
harmony, physically and mentally. The object of his therapy is to
restore what the patient has lost.
In the end I would only like state that according to Dr. Alfonso
Masi-Elizalde, homeopathy is still in a scientific nursery and its
maturity will require the permanent and vigilant effort of many
generations of homeopaths. Thus an insight into this literary genius
reveals that he was a brilliant homeopath, & a true philosopher
of health. Each drop of rebelliousness preached by him required
a double effort from those who surrounded him. He criticized people
who were much older or wiser than he, but as he always use to say,
his fight was with the principles not with the personalities."
It was not difficult to agree with him. However, to discuss and
to write for someone of his experience, caliber, and analytical
accuracy was a special priviledge.
------------------------------------------------
Dr. Kamlendra Tyagi
Lecturer, SK Homeopathic Medical College, Jaipur |