In our last lecture we studied Nature’s Law of Cure, which
states:
A weaker dynamic affection is permanently extinguished
in the living organism by a stronger one, if the latter (whilst
differing in kind) is very similar to the former in its manifestations.
After explaining Nature’s Law of Cure in aphorism 26 and
stating that homeopathy medicines also cure because they work
according to nature’s law, it was time to explain how and
why homeopathic remedies cure diseases. This Dr. Hahnemann does
in the next two aphorisms.
Hahnemann had always believed that it is better to focus on
practical aspects of sickness with the help of the changes one
can perceive through his senses and that empty theoretical speculation
should be avoided. In the introduction to the Organon of Medicine,
he states:
The partisans of the old school of medicine flattered themselves
that they could justly claim for it alone the title of rational
medicine, because they alone sought for and strove to remove
the cause of disease, and followed the method employed by nature
in diseases.
Tolle causam! They cried incessantly. But they went no
further than this empty exclamation. They only fancied that
they could discover the cause of disease; they did not discover
it, however, as it is not perceptible and not discoverable.
For as far the greatest number of diseases are of dynamic origin
and dynamic nature, their cause is therefore not perceptible
to the senses; so they exerted themselves to imagine one, and
from a survey of the parts of the normal, inanimate human body
(anatomy), compared with the visible changes of the same internal
parts in persons who had died of diseases (pathological anatomy),
as also from what they could deduce from a comparison of the
phenomena and functions in healthy life (physiology) with their
endless alterations in the innumerable morbid states (pathology,
semeiotics), to draw conclusions relative to the invisible process
whereby the changes which take place in the inward being of
man in diseases are affected - a dim picture of the imagination,
which theoretical medicine regarded as its prima causa morbi;*
So you can see Hahnemann was clearly against putting up theoretical
constructs to explain how medicines work. He was more concerned
about the practical application of the remedies to cure the sick.
Yet, there were people who wanted to know how homeopathic remedies
worked. And there still are lots of such people, who cannot believe
their own senses till somebody comes up with a scientific explanation
of what they perceive. So Hahnemann did give an explanation in
aphorism 29. But before that he placed a warning in aphorism 28
for the kind of people mentioned above. Let’s see what he
said:
§ 28
As this natural law of cure manifests itself in every pure
experiment and every true observation in the world, the fact
is consequently established; it matters little what may be scientific
explanation of how it takes place; and I do not attach much
importance to the attempts made to explain it. But the following
view seems to commend itself as the most probable one, as it
is founded on premises derived from experience.
So he says that when the truth is so clearly visible to our senses,
he does not attach much importance to how the internal dynamics
of the body and the remedy are working and interacting. Hahnemann
knew that creating empty speculations here would have opened up
a Pandora’s box – everybody would have come up with
his own hypothesis. Hahnemann wanted everyone to focus on the
clinical application of the remedies.
But times have changed now. It has been nearly 200 years since
Hahnemann wrote those lines and today Homeopathy not only enjoys
a wide and growing user base, but its clinical efficacy is also
fairly well documented. The ‘rational medicine’ (allopathy)
of Hahnemann’s time has also become much more sophisticated
in this time, with a much better understanding of the ‘material’
tolle causam. I personally feel that if Homeopathy has to take
the next big leap, we will need to answer two fundamental questions:
1. How is information stored and transmitted in homeopathic
remedies?
2. How do the remedies interact with biological systems?
Until we do this, homeopathy will continue to remain on the fringes
of medical science. The good thing is that now lot of people are
making great efforts to find out the answers to these questions.
Leading physicists and scientists like Prof. Rustom Roy, Prof.
Iris Bell, Dr. Alex Hankey, Dr. Lionel Milgrom, Dr, Martin Chaplin
and many others have created an increasing knowledge base to find
out the underlying cause and effect of the homeopathic remedies.
Also, there is an ever-increasing group of people focusing on
the clinical research. Next month, that is November 2009, we are
going to publish a special issue of Homeopathy 4 Everyone
that will focus on all these scientific developments.
Having said that, I must reiterate that Hahnemann was very wise
in putting up this warning. He knew where his priorities lay and
what was in the best interest of this new system of medicine.
So after giving this warning, Hahnemann did give an explanation
to answer the people, who always wanted to know how homeopathic
remedies worked. Let us read aphorism 29 and find out what Hahnemann
said:
§ 29
As every disease (not entirely surgical) consists only
in a special, morbid, dynamic alteration of our vital energy
(of the principle of life) manifested in sensation and motion,
so in every homoeopathic cure this principle of life dynamically
altered by natural disease is seized through the administration
of medicinal potency selected exactly according to symptom-similarity
by a somewhat stronger, similar artificial disease-manifestation.
By this the feeling of the natural (weaker) dynamic disease-manifestation
ceases and disappears. This disease-manifestation no longer
exists for the principle of life, which is now occupied and
governed merely by the stronger, artificial disease-manifestation.
This artificial disease-manifestation has soon spent its force
and leaves the patient free from disease, cured. The dynamis,
thus freed, can now continue to carry life on in health. This
most highly probable process rests upon the following propositions.
Hahnemann is saying that diseases are primarily of two types
– surgical and dynamic. Dynamic diseases are those that
start with the derangement of the vital force, or as I would say,
disturbance in the biological thermodynamic equilibrium. We have
already discussed that the curative power of homeopathic medicines
lies in their ability to produce similar symptoms. So when a homeopathic
remedy is administered, it produces symptoms similar to the existing
disease condition. Hahnemann says that when the body is affected
by a similar but stringer dynamic disturbance, the weaker dynamic
disturbance ceases to have an effect on the body and disappears.
But how does this happen? Let me try to give an explanation.

Suppose a dynamic disturbance is affecting a body to a level
‘a’. The body is putting in ‘x’ resources
to get the equilibrium back. Obviously the ‘x’ resources
are not sufficient because the vital force is deranged and it
needs more effort to get rid of the disturbance ‘a’.
Hence the disease state is persisting. Now we give a homeopathic
remedy that produces a similar but stronger state ‘A’
in the body. The body now perceives this as a greater threat and
mounts greater defense using its reserves. The new defense‘X’
would be stronger than the previous one. If the new defense is
sufficient to get rid of the disturbance ‘a’, ‘a’
would cease to exist. Now what would happen to the artificial
disturbance ‘A’? This being produced by controlled
application of medicines, is short lived and disappears on its
own and the body is now healthy once again.
This is a basic explanation for Hahnemann’s words, but
please remember that Hahnemann’s words and my explanation
of them still constitute a hypothesis. We do need to prove it.
But if you are a homeopath, don’t feel restricted by the
lack of scientific explanations. Let the physicists work on these
questions and they will sure find the answers for us someday.
As a clinician put all your energies into ‘experiencing’
the truth of homeopathy. The proof of the pudding, lies in its
eating!
Now, one last food for thought before we end this lecture. When
we ‘prove’ a medicine, the medicine does not seem
to work unconditionally. It will prove on some and not on others,
depending upon the sensitivity and the susceptibility of the person.
But when a person is sick and in need of a particular medicine,
it nearly always works – seemingly unconditionally. Have
you ever wondered why? We will answer this question in our next
lecture. Till then, enjoy homeopathy!
----------------------------------------
Dr. Manish Bhatia |