The 6th Edition of the Organon
The 6th edition of Organon is the synthesis of Hahnemann's "new
methods" and his final discourse on the art and science of
Homoeopathy. In the 6th edition aphorism 246 integrates the ideas
introduced in aphorisms 245 and 246 of the 5th edition into one
long paragraph. The wording of this new aphorism is almost exactly
the same as these two paragraphs in the 5th edition.
Vide the first section of paragraph 246 of the 6th edition.
"Every perceptibly progressive and
strikingly increasing amelioration during treatment [DL] is a
condition which, as long as it lasts, completely precludes every
repetition of the administration of any medicine whatsoever [DL],
because all the good the medicine taken continues to effect is
now hastening towards its completion."
The first part of this paragraph reflects aphorism 245 of the 5th
edition. When a single dose of the LM potency produces an obvious
progressively increasing amelioration the remedy should not
be repeated. This is because the simillimum is already
hastening toward cure at the fastest possible rate.
A strikingly increasing amelioration is one in which the patient
feels better day by day as the symptoms are rapidly reduced and
the vitality increases. The repetition of the LM potency under this
condition can cause aggravations and relapse of the symptoms or
just slow down the cure.
Single dose cures are more common in acute diseases but there are
also chronic patients that only need a single dose or very infrequent
repetitions. For the above reasons, I usually give my patients a
single test dose of the chosen remedy at the start of the treatment.
On rare occasions, I may give a patient a series of three test
doses with the instructions to stop the remedy immediately if there
is any aggravation or striking amelioration. I only use this triple-split
dose on those patients that appear hyposensitive when they cannot
return for a quick follow up assessment.
An Example of a LM Single Dose Cure
While working in the hill district of Himachal Pradesh, in North
India a teenage girl was presented to me with the following symptoms:
Her left foot and lower leg had been terribly infected for at least
a year and now there was advanced blood poisoning and a danger of
gangrene. She had been given antibiotics several times but they
did not help her.
Her foot and lower leg were very cold and there was numbness, tingling,
burning, itching, swelling and an angry red blister-like eruption.
The veins of her legs were swollen and icy cold and the condition
was aggravated in the cold weather or when the cold wind blew down
out of the mountains. These symptoms represented the location, sensations,
and modifications of the chief complaint.
I now began to probe for some concomitants to fill out the case.
Most people with such a serious complaint are very anxious or afraid
yet she bore her suffering bravely. I asked her how she did in school
and she mentioned to me that she had trouble reading because the
letters seemed to move or appear double.
This would give her headaches and make it hard to study. As her
eye condition had nothing to do with her chief complaint I looked
up this concomitant in the repertory immediately. Under Vision;
moving; letters; I found Agar, am-c., con., Hyos., iod., merc.,
phys..
Then it struck me! Her leg looked and felt like it had been frozen.
I quickly looked up Fearlessness because she seemed so brave under
the condition she faced and found, Agar., bell., coca., OP., sil..
The coldness of the limb, the numbness, tingling, the blistered
eruptions are all found in the materia medica under the remedy Agaricus.
Agaricus LM 0/1 was made in a 6 oz. remedy solution and the patient
was given one teaspoon as a dose and told to return the next day.
The next day the foot and leg looked much better! The swelling
was down and the girl seemed happy. I did not repeat the dose because
this response was "striking."
I told her to come back in three days if the leg continued to improve
but immediately if there was any relapse. She came back in three
days and the leg was looking much better. The blisters were healing,
the red diminishing, and the blood poisoning was reduced. I told
her to come back in one week. After a week she returned walking
on her foot. It looked so much better it was amazing.
I told her to come back once a week unless there was a relapse
of the symptoms. The next week her foot was completely healed and
warm. All of this took place in just under three weeks.
This is an example of a single dose of an LM 0/1 causing a "striking
rapid cure". A single dose of LM 0/1 is not to be underestimated.
One dose of a LM 0/1 has removed severe attacks of asthma for 9
months before a relapse. A few more doses and the case was cleared.
We have seen this type of response many times.
When using the LM potency it is always best to give a single dose
and ask the patient to come back in 3 to 7 days, or more, depending
on the nature of the disease. Cases of slowly developing chronic
diseases may take a little longer to clearly show the reaction to
the first dose.
If the patient has a "striking" reaction to the remedy
the repetition of the dose is contraindicated. If the dramatic healing
reaction slows down the time has come to examine the case to see
if it is time for the second dose. The remedy should then be repeated
to see how it acts the second time. One may find that an infrequent
repetition of the remedy is all that is necessary.
If the reaction is not very dramatic then the remedy may be introduced
at intervals that correspond to the reaction of the constitution.
The LM potency should not be repeated mechanically as if it were
a 6x potency!
The LM system is far too deep acting for this kind of approach
and demands sensitivity and flexibility in the homoeopath's hands.
The wait and watch philosophy is still a very important part of
Hahnemann's advanced methods.
Speeding the Cure
Not all constitutions respond to a single dose as in the case I
have given above. It is more common in chronic disease to need to
know how to skillfully repeat a remedy in order to complete a cure.
Hahnemann reminds us that the single dose cure is much more common
in acute or recent cases than it is in chronic disorders and miasmic
diseases.
Vide the second section of aphorism 246.
"This [the single dose cure] is not
infrequently the case in acute diseases, but in more chronic disease,
on the other hand, a single dose of an appropriately selected
homoeopathic remedy will at times complete even with slowly progressive
improvement and give the help which a remedy in such a case can
accomplish naturally within 40, 50, 60, 100 day [DL].
This is, however, but rarely the case;
and besides, it must be a matter of great importance to the physician
as well as to the patient that were it possible, this period should
be diminished to one-half, one-quarter, and even still less [DL],
so that a much more rapid cure might be obtained".
Many individuals read the above paragraph but fail to note that
Hahnemann makes a grand differentiation between two fundamental
types of remedy reactions.
In the first part of aphorism 246 the Founder describes the reaction
as a "progressive and strikingly increasing amelioration
during treatment". This strikingly progressive increasing
amelioration is a reaction that is enhanced day by day. Under such
conditions the repetition of the LM potency is normally precluded
because the first single dose is already moving the patient toward
cure at the fastest possible rate.
In the second section of aphorism 246 the Founder uses the words
"slowly progressive improvement". There is a vast difference
between a rapid improvement where the patient feels much better
every day and a slow improvement where the patient barely notices
any changes! It is only in these slow moving cases that aphorism
246 permits the repetition of the LM potency at suitable intervals
to speed the cure.
If we want to speed the cure of these slow moving cases to 1/2,
1/4 or less the time it takes with the old methods of the 4th Organon
one must use special techniques. What are they, Master Hahnemann?
The answer to this question is separated into four parts.
Vide the third section of aphorism 246.
1. "And this may be very happily
effected, as recent and oft-repeated observations have taught
me under the following conditions: Firstly, if the medicine selected
with the utmost care was perfectly homoeopathic [DL]."
The first condition for speeding the cure in slow moving cases
is that the remedy must be perfectly homoeopathic. If the consultant
does not have a clear picture of the remedy it is best to be conservative
with the dose. Repeating the wrong remedy can cause more harm than
good. When there is a marked, progressive amelioration of the symptoms
on the single test dose, I do not repeat the remedy.
I very carefully observe the number of days that this increasing
amelioration lasts. This offers the homoeopath insights into the
duration of the remedy and reveals what a suitable interval might
be for the patient. If the striking response lasts forever one does
not need to repeat the remedy at all!
If the markedly progressive improvement lasts for 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
or 6 days, the remedy is only given every 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 days
respectively. If the increasing amelioration lasts 1, 2, or 3 weeks,
the remedy may be repeated every 1, 2, or 3 weeks. If the increasing
amelioration lasts 1, 2, or 3 months, the remedy may be repeated
every 1, 2, or 3 months. If it lasts 1, 2, or 3 years, give the
remedy every 1, 2, or 3 years, etc.
2. "Secondly, if it is highly potentized,
dissolved in water, and given in a proper small dose that experience
has taught as the most suitable. [DL]"
The second condition for speeding the cure is the use of the medicinal
solution. Without the liquid dose none of the other advantages of
the new method are available. When using the dry pills the homoeopath
should follow the rules laid down in the 4th Organon. This simple
change from the static dry dose to the flexible liquid solution
is the foundation of all other breakthroughs.
Hahnemann's Paris casebooks show that the Founder used the medicinal
solution with his centesimal potencies in exactly the same manner
as the LM potency in his last years. The remedy solution is not
only more flexible than the dry dose but also much more powerful.
Hahnemann also used olfaction of the medicinal solutions as a delivery
system.
Vide aphorism 272.
"Such a globule, placed dry upon
the tongue, is one of the smallest doses for a moderate recent
case of illness. Here but few nerves are touched by the medicine.
A similar globule, crushed with some sugar of milk and dissolved
in a good deal of water {refer to # 247} and stirred well before
every administration will produce a far more powerful medicine
for the use of several days [DL]. Every dose, no matter how minute,
touches, on the contrary, many nerves."
Hahnemann also suggested repeating the remedy:
3. "in definite intervals for the
quickest accomplishment of the cure [DL]"
The third aspect of speeding the cure is the repetition of the
dose in definite intervals of time. This is a new concept for those
practitioners who are not familiar with Hahnemann's most advanced
teachings.
The intervals between these repetitions must be determined by the
nature of the reaction to the remedy, the sensitivity of the constitution,
and the nature of the disease. This allows the homoeopath to personalize
the remedy schedule in relationship to the time and progression
of the healing process.
The fourth condition for speeding the cure begins:
4. "...with the precaution, that
the degree of every dose deviate somewhat from the preceding and
following in order that the vital principle be not aroused to
untoward reactions and revolt as is always the case with unmodified
and especially rapidly repeated doses [DL]. "
This last aspect of the complete dose is the succussion of the
remedy solution just prior to the ingestion of the medicine. The
succussion of the remedy solution changes the potency of the dose
so that the vital force never receives the exact same dose twice
in succession. This prevents the relapse of symptoms that appears
from the repetition of a dry dose before the cessation of the action
of the previous dose.
These four points reflect the improvements that had taken place
in Homoeopathy during the period between the years 1833 and 1843.
These new methods can only be applied by those homoeopaths that
follow the explicit directions that Hahnemann gave in the 5th and
6th editions.
If Necessary!
All of the statements about repeating the dose to speed the cure
relate specifically to those cases that demonstrate only
a slow amelioration that may take 50, 60 or 100 days to show any
significant improvement.
These circumstances condition all the following statements made
about the use of daily and alternate day doses in aphorism 248.
If the patient is doing very well on a single dose or infrequent
repetitions then more rapid repetitions do not apply.
There are homoeopaths that mechanically administer the LM potency
daily for days, weeks and months on end with every patient. They
have not yet understood the fine print in the footnote to aphorism
246. Every case must be individualized and the repetition adjusted
accordingly.
In this footnote the Founder explains some of the changes he made
in the 6th Organon and when the daily dose is applicable.
"What I said in the fifth edition
of the Organon, in a long note to this paragraph in order to prevent
these undesirable reactions of the vital energy, was all that
the experience I then had justified.
But during the last four or five years,
however, all these difficulties are wholly solved by my new altered
but perfected LM method. The same carefully selected medicine
may now be given daily and for months, if necessary [DL] in this
way, namely, after the lower degree of potency has been used for
one or two weeks in the treatment of chronic disease, advance
is made in the same way to higher degrees, (beginning according
to the new LM potency method, taught herewith with the use of
the lowest degrees)."
In the footnote to aphorism 246 Hahnemann suggests that a well
chosen remedy (not a poorly chosen one) may be given daily if necessary
in slow improving cases. When repetition of the remedy is
not necessary the LM potency will cause strong aggravations, unproductive
accessory symptoms, and slow down the cure.
Unneeded repetition can make a patient more hypersensitive or make
them non reactive due to over exposure. Hahnemann's new posology
method spans the single unit dose in striking responses and the
repetition of remedies at suitable intervals to speed the cure in
slower moving cases when necessary. In this way, the posology strategy
can be tailored to a great variety of patients and conditions.
Boenninghausen sought detailed information about how Hahnemann
administered his medicines in his last years from Dr. Croserio,
a close colleague of the Founder. In Boenninghausen's Lesser Writings
Croserio said that Hahnemann would reduce the dose or stop
the repetition of his remedies as soon as he observed definite medicinal
reactions.
He also noted that Hahnemann often gave a single dose of olfaction
with placebo and usually did not repeat the dose for at least one
week. In my review of the microfiches of Hahnemann's Paris casebooks
I found that in most cases the Founder often stopped his medicines,
gave placebo, and waited and watched for long periods.
Hahnemann did not mechanically gave the LM potency daily
for weeks, months and years on end! It was more common
for him to use a series of doses followed by, or interspersed with,
series of placebos.
In his later years he sometimes gave a LM potency and placebo at
the same time but he did not note down the schedules. This means
that some of the prescriptions could be a single dose and others
could be the interpolation of placebo with the medicine at various
intervals. Hahnemann only recommends the daily dose when
it is necessary. |