|
Dr. Samee |
|
|
Non-availability in Pakistan. |
|
|
Peter Konrad, Ravensburg, Germany |
|
|
Basically I am content with the results of my C-potencies. I find it very complicated, also for the patient, how long to take LM, when to stop or start again, change potency, to validate the results of the remedy. It would mean in a busy practice to spend half the day on the phone. |
|
|
Marijke |
|
|
I have found graet results with de LM-potentie. |
|
|
doctorleela |
|
|
I had posted this earlier, but its not here!
I find LM's helpful when the C potencies don't "penetrate" the case enough.
In patients who require a lot of repetition of doses to keep them stable, LM's are better than C's.
Patients who are on allopathic medication at the same time seem to need an Lm probably due to some of these drugs interfering with the remedy.
Most chronic cases with a lot of physical pathology have benefitted with Lm's.
Lm's cause just as much aggravations as C's and the dosage has to be carefully individualized to the sensitivity/susceptibility of the patient. Some people just do better on C's instead. |
|
|
w.a.gaebler |
|
|
you can handle LM (Q) potencies easier than Decimal or Centesimal potencies |
|
|
ANBAZHAGAN |
|
|
LM POTENCIES ARE NOT AVAILABLE AND NOT IN PRACTICE IN FULL. AS IT IS NOT ADVISABLE TO ADMINISTER LM POTENCY ALTERNATING WITH CENTECIMAL POTENCY I AM NOT USING LM POTENCY. |
|
|
sheikhwah |
|
|
Because i found (LM) well in chronic disease. |
|
|
Jitka |
|
|
I´m unprofessional, I only feel it so. |
|
|
lynneb |
|
|
While I have some info on the LM potencies I donot have a lot and do not feel comfortable using them and have some concern about client compliance |
|
|
Joyce Melat |
|
|
I know that LM potencies are great. My inventory of remedies I am always increasing as I can. I would say that the LM potency just gets put on the back burner. I know there is a web site that sells nothing but LM potencies. Come to think of it that is probably how I found you initially!!! |
|