Sandra Russo
All Hereditary predisposition , can be easily be placed under the existing 3 which were founded by Hahnemann. I have never found this to be lacking. There seems to be much work being done to push forward for individual fame as opposed to pushing forward Homoeopathy as a scientific / art for healing the sick. I find much of the new work, rather than adding to Homoeopathy adds to a persons ego!
	Astra2012
I never heard of it-but it would be interesting to do (in students corner?).
	dilshad ali
yayayayyaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
	homoeoadvice
I believe miasms as heriditary predisposition. and manifestations of these are dependent on individual immune system
	onyx
i read his books
	a. Duquesnoy
Hereditary predisposition , I believe there are only 3 which can have an effect on the patients physical and psycological being.
	homeopathic@hotmail.com
I find the Sankaran approach and the Vital Sensation a VERY useful tool and it is appropriate in 90% of my cases. I do feel that the poll options show a distinct biasis as there is one answer that is slightly favourable. While the Miasm therory is extendend from the conventional approach it provides an oppurtunity to understand the patient that much more
	Dr.Menon
I have not come across Dr.Sankarans vital sensations, but I am aware of miasms which is true as per Hahnemann's findings and I fully agree with him. I think it can be explained as chronic disease syndrome with inherited predisposition. I strongly feel the existing classification of miasms as originally explained by the great master covers everything, singularly or mixed and there is no meaning in giving an another name for an already existing combination of miasm.
	Edward De Beukelaer
One major contribution of his work to classical homeopathy is amount of emphasis that is put on individuality and patient's sensitivity. This needs to be taken in fully by all of us. I don't use the miasms because I find them rather subjective (and I am a vet). I do sometimes have the awkward feeling that they are used to justify the decision of the homeopath. One question I would like to ask the homeopathic community is the following: 'Could you agree that the birth of Miasm theorie by Hahnemann was the consequence of his struggle to master the essential rules, he so geniously discerned, that make homeopathic pescription possible?' His further genious was that this miasm framework was so appealing that it found many uses and debates through the centuries. Sankaran's technique is a form of classification, although a very refined one, that somewhat goes against the individuality principle but supplies us with the impression of reliability. I think there is a lot to learn from his work but I would not classify it as the one and tru way of practicing homeopathy (which I have seen some homeopaths declare). Don't forget that homeopathic history is paved with practitioners devising frameworks to make prescription easier or more reliable.
	loudaubert@aol.com
I voted that I had never heard of it. Also I really don't understand about miasms. I think they're hereditary, but I don't know more than that.