Complete Repertory 2009

The Complete Repertory is a standard reference source, being one of the two principle modern repertories in daily use by homeopaths all over the world, and has been translated into several languages. Based on Kent’s Repertory, it has been extensively revised, corrected and updated through several editions and incorporating material from materia medica and many other repertories.

In its latest 2009 edition it contains more than 1.9 million remedy additions in over 178,000 rubrics. The new Complete Repertory features the changes to the remedy grading system that were introduced in the Repertorium Universale, and benefits from the extensive revision and increase in number of cross-references between rubrics undertaken for the introduction of this repertory. (See Repertory Guide for further details.)

Since the release of the Complete Repertory 4.5, an additional 52,500 rubrics and 981,300 remedy additions have been made.

• Authors profile
• Structural changes
• Repertory grade comparisons
• Latest additions
• Comparisons with previous edition and Synthesis 9.1

Authors profile

An enormous amount of work during the last 4 years has gone into integrating the important sources of the past into the Complete Repertory. The percentage of material from old sources (pre-1931) has been substantially increased with additions from the likes of T F Allen, Jahr, Farrington, etc. (See also the Top 12 Complete Repertory 2009 Authors below). There have been criticsms that modern repertories feature too many additions from modern sources. These statistics here show this is not the case.

Author additions	Pre 1930	Post 1930	Total
CR 2005	1,807,537	410,303	2,217,840
CR 2008	2,453,116	590,285	3,043,401
CR 2009	2,978,355	460,688	3,439,043

(NB. CR 2008 statistics are anomalous due to some errors in the Bilbiography that attributed post-1930 dates to pre-1931 material.)

Some authors, like Hahnemann, Boger, Kent and Knerr, who where already well represented in the last four versions of the Complete Repertory/Repertorium Universale, have seen their additions increase gradually, while authors like Allen, Jahr, Farrington and Lippe have increased substantially due to the inclusion of all second degree and higher symptoms from Allen's Encyclopedia, Jahr’s Symptom Codex (still in progress), Farrington’s Clinical Materia Medica, all repertory work in Lilienthal's Homeopathic Therapeutics, all material out of Lippe's (Bannerjea's) Keynotes and Redline Symptoms, and (nearly) all Lippe’s articles. All these sources have considerably increased the amount of clinical verifications (ie. 3rd and 4th degree additions).

Author	RU III	CR 2005	CR 2008	CR 2009
Allen, T F	105,890	166,395	306,192	323,043
Boger, C M	43,869	46,422	56,371	58,298
von Bönninghausen, C F M	269,663	278,117	298,449	353,470
Boericke, Oscar	87,060	88,650	106,523	109,818
Farrington, E	929	920	3,986	60,312
Jahr, Gottlieb	23,980	25,140	28,514	135,710
Hahnemann, S C F	89,029	94,521	118,229	124,639
Hering, C	23,737	54,632	131,787	138,173
Kent, J T	841,372	927,639	1,053,359	1,108,694
Knerr, C B	50,879	53,509	61,516	69,573
Lilienthal, S	125	160	101,398	105,111
von Lippe, A	688	722	86,077	106,833

Structural Changes

For 2008, some structural changes were made to the repertory. After working on the Repertorium Universale structure for quite some years and seeing that most people do not understand it, or for various reasons do not want to work with it, it was time to go back to the more Kentian version: Complete Repertory. In order to make the information easier to access the following structural changes were made:

• The "Ailments from" rubrics were rearranged under the Mind section. Previously some of these (eg. Anger, vexation agg., Anguish agg., Anticipation, foreboding, presentiment agg. and Anxiety agg.) were contained in the Generalities section.
• In the extremities section all specific localisations under "Upper limbs" and "Lower limbs", ie. upper arms, elbows, ankles, feet, etc., were moved up a level in the hierarchy. You can now open Extremities; Pain and go directly to feet, or hands, etc. That means a lot of rubrics have become much more easy to reach, being less deeply embedded in the hierarchy of the repertory.
• Similarly, in the Mind Section, body parts in Delusions were moved up a level from the 'body parts' subrubric, eg. Delusions; body; body parts; hands becomes Delusions; body; hands. This is also the case with body parts in the Dreams section.
• Mind Section rubrics featuring animals in Fears, Dreams and Delusions were moved up a level in the hierarchy so that, for instance, Fear; animals; dogs becomes Fear; dogs.
• In the main rubrics of all sections the generalised modalities were merged with the phenomena. In CR2005 there were sometimes long listings of generalised modalities before the list of phenomena, and many users would like to see the phenomena more directly. Therefore I have merged them and, when the first word of the modality was the same as the first word of the phenomenon, I have made the modality a sub-rubric of the phenomenon, thus emphasizing the phenomenon a little bit more. For example, instead of having two entries for Activity, the first a modality and the second a phenomenon, both the modalities and phenomena attributable to Activity are now listed under the one rubric.
• The specific tastes, discolourations and smell/odours were taken out of their main rubrics when appropriate and moved up a level in the hierarchy, enabling the user to go to a specific discolouration, taste or odour directly.
• In Speech & Voice, the main rubrics now begin with the descriptive term, eg. Speech, awkward becomes Awkward speech.

Repertory Grade Comparison from Kent's to Complete Repertory 2009

Click on graph to see larger image. Click again to toggle off.

Originally the third degree was the highest degree available in my repertories, an inheritance of Kent's grading system. On top of these was later added a fourth degree, inheritance of Pierre Schmidt. I am convinced P Schmidt's fourth degree is actually the same as Bönninghausen's fourth degree (fifth degree when you count the zero degree in Bönninghausen as the first) and therefore in later versions of my work this P Schmidt degree is amalgamated with the fourth degree of Bönninghausen. This change took place in CR2001. Starting with RU III in this graph the Bönninghausen degree system is used. The second degree now expresses the information found in provings and available from two or more provers, enabling us to have a more pronounced analysis of especially those often new remedies that would otherwise be 'flat', not expressing any addition in the repertory in any degree but the lowest.

Latest additions

In the Complete Repertory 2009, some of the lesser known remedies have gained more than 30% new third or fourth degree material (compared to Complete Repertory 2008): coll. ferr. ferr-pic. ham. benz-ac. symph. bar-m. usn. hippoz. quarc. titan. crot-c. nast. cror-r. chim. prun. kali-ar. card-m. ars-i. seneg. aethi-m. myrt-c. salv. aur-m. merc-d. iris mag-p. cupr-acet. lac-d. cimx. pareir. uva petros. lac-c. lec. ol-sant. (see Bibliography for full list):

Comparisons with previous edition

	CR 2008	CR 2009
Number of author sources	1,196	1,318
Number of author sources more than Synthesis 9.1	310	432
Remedy additions more than Kent	1,245,192	1,410,791
Remedy additions more than CR 2005	211,384	376,983
Remedy additions more than CR 2008		165,599
Remedy additions more than Synthesis 9.1	681,350	1,666,316
Author occurences more than Kent	2,540,256	2,936,624
Author occurences more than CR 2005	830,645	1,221,929
Author occurences more than CR 2008		391,284
Author occurences more than Synthesis 9.1	1,275,032	1,440,631
Remedies with more than 50% new information (compared to CR2005)	160
New remedies (compared to CR2005)	89	89