Pages: 1 2
In previous issues of this journal I’ve presented two articles on research related to Homoeopathy 1, 2. Since that time there have been more developments in this area, and some which I’d not unearthed until recently.
Why is this issue important? It’s critical to have a solid research database in Homoeopathy because of the radical departure it makes from known scientific principles. Given the fact that other medicines used by natural therapists such as herbs and nutrients are essentially working at a pharmacological level, we don’t have to stretch our imaginations too far to accept the clinical evidence for them. However, unless one has had direct clinical experience of the benefits of Homoeopathy, it can take a much larger leap of faith to accept that a potentised substance diluted out often past the point where there’s any physically active material present, will produce any effect at all, let alone a therapeutic one.
So for many, particularly those with an orthodox science background, the brave new world of homoeopathy is unlikely to be explored unless something solid can be felt under the explorer’s boot. With this in mind, following are some more abridged highlights from the annals of homoeopathic research.
1. Fisher P., Greenwood A, Huskisson EC, Turner P and Belon P. Effect of Homoeopathic Treatment on Fibrositis, British Medical Journal, 5 August, 1989, 299, 365-366. Patients using Rhus tox 6C three times daily in a double blind placebo controlled crossover trial found significant relief with the medicine over the placebo.
2. Bignamini M, Saruggia M, Sansonetti G. Homeopathic Treatment of Anal Fissures using Nitricum acidum Berlin J on Res in Hom, 1, 4/5, 286-287, December 1991. Patients using Nitricum acidum 9C once daily in a double blind placebo controlled trial found subjective relief with the medicine over the placebo.
3. Alibeu JP, Jobert J. Aconite in Post-Operative Pain and Agitation in Children, Pediatrie, 1990, 45, 7-8, 465-6. Children given homoeopathic Aconite in a double blind placebo controlled trial found significant relief (95%) with the medicine over the placebo.
4. Gibson R.G, & Gibson S.L.Homoeopathic Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Evaluation by Double Blind Clinical Therapeutic Trial, Br J. Clin. Pharmac., 9, 1980, 453-459. Patients using a number of different homoeopathic medicines, prescribing according to homoeopathic principles, were given this medicine or a placebo with their normal anti-arthritic drug. The trial was carried out blind and significant results were achieved with the medicine over the placebo in all areas measured.
5. Gasssinger CA, Wunstel G, Netter P. A Controlled Clinical Trial for Testing the Efficacy of the Homoeopathic Drug, Eupatorium perfoliatum, D2 in the Treatment of Common Cold Arznei Forsch, 1981, 31, 4, 732-736. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Aspirin or Eupatorium perfoliatum 2X. The latter was found to be as effective as Aspirin in reducing the duration and severity of symptoms.
6. Ferley JP, Zmirou D, D’Adhemar D, Balducci F. A Controlled Evaluation of a Homoeopathic Preparation in the Treatment of Influenza-like Syndrome. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 1989, Mar, 27, 3, 329-335. 487 people suffering from influenza were assigned to either Oscillococcinum (Anas barb.) 200CK or placebo, twice daily for 5 days. Significant results were achieved with the medicine over the placebo in all areas measured. This trial was repeated in 1998 (Papp R, Schuback G, Beck E, Burkard G, Bengel J, Lehrl S, Belon P. Oscillococcinum in Patients with Influenza-like Syndromes. British Homeopathic Journal, April 1998, 87, pp69-76) with 372 people with the same results.
7. Barnes J, Resch KL, Ernst E. Homoeopathy for Post-Operative Ileus? J. Clin Gastroent, 1997, December, 25, 4, 628-633. A number of controlled studies comparing the activity of various homoeopathic medicines with placebo were analysed. Patients using low potency homoeopathics were found to have a significantly better response to the homoeopathic medicines over the placebo.
8. Moroweiec-Bajda A, Lukomski M, Latkowski B. The Clinical Efficacy of Vertigoheel in the Treatment of Vertigo of Various Pathology. Panminerva Medica, 1993, June, 35, 2, 101-104,
Weisser M, Strosser W, Klein P. Homeopathic vs Conventional Treatment of Vertigo. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1998, Aug, 124, 8, 879-885. In this study, 31 patients with vertigo from various aetiologies were treated with a homoeopathic complex- regression of symptoms was seen in the majority of cases. This trial was repeated in1998 under double blind conditions and compared with an orthodox medicine routinely used for this condition in 118 people. The homoeopathic provided similar results to the orthodox medicine. (Homeopathic vs Conventional Treatment of Vertigo Weiser M, Strosser W, Klein P Arch of Otoloaryng- Head and Neck Surg, august, 1998, 124, 879-885)
9. Erythema Hill N, Stamm C, Tuinder S, Van haselen RA. Homoeopathic After-Bite Gel for Reducing Mosquito bite-induced Erythema. Eur J. Pharmacol, 1995, 49, 03-108. Under double blind placebo controlled trial conditions, patients using an after bite gel containing homoeopathic ingredients for insect bites found significant relief with the medicine over the placebo.
10. Zell J, Connert WG, Mau J, Feuerstake G. Treatment of Acute Sprains of the Ankle. Biol Ther, 7, 1, 1989, 106. Under double blind placebo controlled trial conditions, patients using an ointment containing homoeopathic ingredients for soft tissue injury found significant relief with the medicine over the placebo.
11. Tveiten D, Bruset S, Borchgrevink CFS, Norsch J. Arnica and Muscle Soreness Focus on Alternative and Complementary Medicine (FACT), 1998, 3 (4), 155-156. 46 competitors in the 3 day 1995 Oslo marathon were randomly assigned either Arnica or placebo twice daily and assessed for muscle soreness after the event. Those using Arnica found significant relief with the medicine over the placebo.
Pages: 1 2