| Dear Colleagues,
I hope you are all well. I would like to thank you for your kind
responses to my updates on the pet food problems. I am glad that
so many of your animals responded to my suggestions. Note I am using
the word epidemic here, in that the way we look at this situation
is very similar to the discussions we had in Herscu Letters #32-38
involving epidemics.
The Pet Food Problem
Several weeks ago I began to hear from different people across
the country that their animals were sick and could I try to help
them or their veterinarian, try to help their animals. At first
nothing seemed odd about it. The first case, a dog with vomiting,
diarrhea, and a foamy vomit at the mouth, seemed very similar to
another dog I had recently seen while teaching in Italy, who had
the classic symptoms of liver/kidney failure or liver cancer. It
turned out to be cancer that had affected the liver. I suggested
for this new animal, based on the symptoms, Lycopodium,
similar to the animal I had seen in Italy. I mentioned to the pet
owner that the animal probably has liver damage of some sort and
to check it out. In fact both liver enzymes and kidney readings
were very high. Interestingly enough, this animal recovered quickly
with the homeopathic treatment. There was nothing too unusual for
me in this story yet. I often have vets that study with me call
in special circumstances. What made it unusual was that this telephone
call was followed by another and another, from different vets. I
suspected something was afoot.
Soon after, the news broke about the possibility that rat poison,
melamine, or maybe some other toxin, was in the food and it all
began to make sense to me. I continue to have the opportunity to
treat many of these animals, by assisting vets who have been bombarded
with such cases. All the animals are doing well, except for one
who is fighting for its life at the time of this writing. Its liver
is fine now, though its kidneys are still damaged.
What follows is where I think we are, wholly based on my understanding
primarily of my model of provings, and the way it intersects with
the model of epidemics, and previous similar episodes where we treated
during epidemics:
1. Pets are fed on either table scraps or pet
food.
2. Most vets that are in the natural health field
have shied away from the more common prepared foods/pet foods and
have asked pet owners to feed wholesome foods, similar foods as
they are eating. (To get a clear sense of what that might be, you
might want to contact your vet or The Academy of Veterinary Homeopathy:
http://www.theavh.org
or the American Holistic Veterinary Medical Association: http://www.ahvma.org).
As a plug, I would like to suggest that all vets join these organizations.
You do not have to do everything they suggest. However, when unusual
circumstances arise, you might have resources that you might not
have otherwise.
3. The animals that are fed on table scraps or
a raw food diet have not become ill, but some animals that
are fed on prepared pet food have.
4. From our discussions of provings and epidemics
in the past, I would like to say, for those who have or treat animals
that have eaten tainted food, here is what I have seen
and here is what I would recommend:
a. Most will not show many symptoms,
will not experience a poisoning, i.e., will not have problems.
This has to do with the fact that the level of toxin, versus the
animal’s susceptibility, versus their original constitutional
state is such that they just are not sensitive enough to the toxin,
whatever it is, to make them sick. As a result of this, I predict
that it will be found that even though many, many were exposed
to the food/toxin; most in fact will be fine. As a result, after
the level of concern drops, the numbers of injured will not be
horrific, most likely in the couple of thousands. Mind you, one
is too much.
b. There are the animals that either had more
exposure to the toxin, had a susceptibility to the toxin, or had
a weakened enough constitution to begin with, that when they ate
this food; it was enough to make them sick.
(As in the dog that I mentioned above, that is fighting for its
life, it had several chronic problems to begin with, even before
this exposure.)
c. I am sure there will be a small but real
group of pets that fit in the category of those becoming ill.
The problem of identifying this group is significant as the symptoms
are so similar to chronic disease, such as liver failure, kidney
failure, cancers in the major organs, that I believe that for
many of these animals who were quite ill, it will just be assumed
they were old and sick and the tainted food might not be considered.
No tests will be done, and they will be forgotten. However, that
does not mean that they were not sick, or sicker from
the food/toxins.
d. Of the animals that ate these foods and are
exhibiting symptoms, what can we do for them? Well… based
on our previous discussions, we know that patients that get sick
from the same stressor, share similar susceptibilities. What I
have understood and shared with you in our discussions on provings,
is that, they share a small similar number of constitutional states.
This makes sense if you think about it for a moment.
Not all dogs will be the same. Even littermates will have different
symptoms and different temperaments. It is this difference that
creates or allows for different susceptibilities, which then allows
different stressors to effect some, but not all, exposed.
e. What I have found is that of the animals
that have gotten sick, those that were in a Lycopodium
state or even near a Lycopodium state were the
ones most susceptible. As a result, they enter into a true Lycopodium
state, and experience symptoms that fit this particular remedy.
f. If you can, please make sure the constitutional
remedy is still working for your pet or for the pets of people
you know. If it is, they are that much more protected. If not,
but they look like they still need it, i.e., if they have renewed
symptoms covreed well and previously helped by their costitutional
remedy, give a dose of the constitutional remedy. However,
if they do not seem to fit their remedy any longer, and have moved
toward Lycopodium, then that pet is susceptible to this
epidemic if they eat the tainted food.
g. Giving Lycopodium to these animals
early enough, limits the damage and seems to help tremendously.
This is true with both liver and/or kidney damage.
h. If the symptoms progress and the animal declines
before you have a chance to give this remedy, you may find that
as they collapse, they enter either a Nux vomica, Arsenicum
album, Phosphorus, or Veratrum album state.
i. If after giving the Lycopodium,
the liver symptoms, enzymes diminish, but the kidneys still are
damaged and become the main source of the problem, think about
Apocynum which has helped a number of the animals I have
consulted on.
j. As they improve, they may certainly go back
to their chronic state and may need a repetition of their constitutional
remedy.
Hopefully, this short note has made sense thus far. To this I would
add one more point. This is a one time piece of advice, used here,
and should be used ONLY within the first weeks of exposure to the
tainted pet food. If I had an animal living with me, and I knew
for sure that it had eaten the food that seemed to be making other
dogs sick, I would give my dog one dose of Lycopodium 30c,
one time. Period. This is an animal whi is strictly not sick. I
believe it will afford the animal a certain level of protection.
It has no side effects, no lasting effect, and will not hurt the
animal, but may keep it from developing problems in the future.
I hope this helps you make sense of what others may have been forwarding
to you from me.
I am also wondering about the future difficulties and discussions
that will ensue in a few months. Soon people will begin to discuss
the point that if you test all foods for animals and people, there
is a certain level of contaminants. The question is how much is
too much, what should we settle for? This is one place where homeopathy
could have major input, but probably will not due to a lack of consistent
definitions.
In closing, I would like to mention my hope and aspiration that
in the future, homeopathy will be better situated to prepare for
future epidemics, so that we may help not just our pets and animals,
but ourselves, our families, and our human patients as well.
Best of luck in all your endeavours,
Paul Herscu ND
P.S. Understanding this topic is not just important to
dogs and cats, but will come back to haunt each of us in coming
epidemics. There is a very clear method of understanding what is
going on during an epidemic and it is not just about knowing which
remedy or remedies might have effect. We are in the position to
offer effective and widespread help, but certain philosophical factors
and their applications must be understood; which will inform remedy
selection and follow-up care and will make our work more predictably
accurate and effective. This is not in place in our community at
this time. If you would like to be on an email list in order to
receive occasional epidemic updates, please let us know by emailing
us at nesh@nesh.com. We have
written on this topic extensively and will put a timeline of that
work on the website www.nesh.com
in the next few weeks. |