Junk Food, An Obstacle To The Cure?
Question: If someone has had a very bad diet for years, like cakes, cookies, chips, pizza, chocolate, soda — lots of it…. Is there any remedy to antidote it? Is Nux vomica such a remedy?
Egads! You have to stop eating it! Substitute whole foods and raw foods for this dietary disaster and the whole syndrome will go away! Hahnemann would call this an obstacle to the cure. A junk food diet will cause different symptoms to break out in different people. Some will develop migraines, some will get frequent colds, others will develop anxiety attacks and depression, etc. You would have to take the case of whatever syndrome is present and give an appropriate remedy for that; but, the only way to undo the damage permanently is to change your diet to give the immune system the nutrients it needs so it can put your body back into working order.
Question: I’m a 4th (and final year!) student in classical homoeopathy in London and want to gather your thoughts on the homoeopathic treatment of idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP).
Currently, I know someone with this condition who has been having homoeopathic treatment, and while there was a positive reaction to the remedy (Crot-h), the platelets are now steadily falling with the indication that Crot-h is no longer the simillimum. I would be very interested in your thoughts.
How is that an indication that Crotalus is no longer the remedy? Isn’t it just as likely that the potency wore out or the remedy needs more frequent repetitions? You don’t give ANY information on potency and dose! I am really surprised that, as a student, you didn’t think the dosing details were relevant! When someone tells you “the remedy didn’t work”, do not accept that at face value, especially if there was an initial improvement!
You’d want the person to recount his steps so you could pin-point the exact spot where he should have re-dosed or changed the potency. These are all things to keep in mind the next time someone says, “The remedy is no longer the simillimum.”
Case Management–what potency? How often?
Question: How much time should we give a 6c remedy before deciding if it’s right or not? I’ve read about 2 weeks then retake the case? Is it possible that a remedy is right but the potency is wrong?
It all depends on what’s wrong with you. If it’s an acute case, a 6C would be quite inadequate! You would probably have to take it every 15 minutes, and even then….. A 30 or 200C would have been much more appropriate!
But if you’re talking about a chronic case, let me begin by saying that, as per the Organon, one or two remedy pellets should be dropped in a small bottle of water so that the remedy can be succussed (five times) before each dose. Succussing before each dose ensures that the remedy will continue to work.
In a chronic case, start with a 6C potency three times a day. (You could also start with a 9C twice a day or a 12C once a day.) Improvement should occur within two weeks. The rule is, as you improve, take less often. The idea is: you don’t want to overdose, but you don’t want to underdose either! So, it’s a juggling act. All you want is for the improvement to run smoothly, you want to avoid hills and valleys; this is why you’re always juggling the dosing schedule to try to maintain your progress evenly. It’s important to realize that these low potencies get exhausted quickly and the potency needs to be raised at suitable intervals. But, they don’t usually cause aggravations, which means a lot to the patient! Sure, you may wind up eventually at 200C, but, you get there one step at a time, safely!
If the remedy picture changes, don’t keep giving the same remedy, especially if the new picture is an acute of some sort. Stop the remedy and retake the case.
Question: I am looking to explore some remedies that have a strong territorial feel. I’m guessing they will be animal remedies, for someone who feels very uncomfortable when their physical territory is invaded and would describe it as an invasion and say they feel very territorial and it makes their hackles rise. Lives in a house where the garden is surrounded by very high walls, so has a deep need to maintain own territory. Someone who is happiest at home, in their own territory. Likes company but not if it is unexpected or if visitors overstay their welcome, as again their territory is being invaded. Feels angry but rarely confronts people as feels that would be uncivilized, but may resort to petty tactics to protect their territory, e.g. making sure they stop someone parking in their spot by making sure they get there first.
Has a very strong desire for and is strongly better for sun. That sounds more plant-like but I think overall it is animal so maybe a sun loving animal like a lizard, snake, bird?
I was thinking of Nat-mur, not really known to love the sun, but they certainly build walls to keep people out! Do you know who likes to build walls? People who can’t say “No”! People who dislike confrontation and would definitely fear encroachment and try to proactively keep people out, people like Staphysagria, Carcinosin, Baryta carb, Silica…. Think of rubrics like, Mind: company, aversion to; Mind: company, avoids the sight of people; Mind: company, bear anyone, cannot; Mind: fear, strangers; Mind: company, alone amel. “Aversion to company” is a large rubric with 155 remedies. You can’t just think of animals.
The other thing is, an animal type would get right in your face and tell you to get out! Snake remedies like Lachesis will kick you out and keep on kicking you right down the street to make sure you never come back!
I don’t think we can make assumptions that a person needs an animal remedy because he or she feels safest in the home (his “territory”) without unwanted company. The remedy best known for wanting to stay at home is Calcarea carbonica.
I Feel Ugly
Question: Which remedy could help if someone felt extremely ugly, especially their face, but was still doing everyday things… Then something happened where people constantly said how ugly she was and she had a nervous breakdown and insomnia started since then. If severe insomnia started since that incident, what remedy would be for this. This was years ago.
It’s really more a question of, “what rubric is this”? The rubric could be, “Ailments from mortification/humiliation”. Another possible rubric, “Sensitive, opinions, what others say about her” (sensitive to the opinion of others). If you repertorize these two symptoms, the top three remedies are Staphysagria, Ignatia and Nat-mur.
Question: If a person is being given a constitutional remedy, is it ok to be given another remedy in between doses?
Some would say yes, others would say no. The high-potency prescriber would say no. That’s because he gave one dose of a 200C or 1M that he thinks should last until your next appointment, and the last thing in the world he wants you to do is take another remedy which might antidote the first one or otherwise make your follow-up appointment difficult to sort out!
Others would say yes: if you get injured or get sick, you need an “inter-current” remedy. These are the low potency prescribers. They have started you on a 6C three times a day or maybe a 12C once a day. If you get the flu, for example, they would want you to stop your constitutional remedy, take your Gelsemium 200C (or whatever), recover from the flu, and then, if your chronic symptoms reappear as before, get right back on your daily dosing.
Obviously the latter scenario makes more sense. No one wants to have to tell a patient on constitutional treatment, “Don’t take a remedy for that virus! Take an Aspirin instead!” That seems soooooo against everything we stand for–the dangers of suppressing a fever, for example. I just wouldn’t even want to go there!
How Does Homeopathy Work?
Question: How does homeopathy work in the body? Natrum mur for example. I’ve read Nat-mur. is for people who have problems due to excess salt in the diet but then also for cramps or emaciation due to lack of salt. Does this mean that homeopathic remedies work by adjusting both low and high problems?
Homeopathy works by virtue of the remedy presenting an “image” to the immune system, goading it to act, to charge, if you will, the way el toro charges the big red cape the matador waves in his face. The remedy is the big red cape. “Toro! Toro! Toro! Over here!” The immune system goes right for it, takes it down, beats it up! The “image” (cape) resembles the patient’s disease; toro can’t beat up the remedy/cape without beating up the disease at the same time! Hence, the “Law Of Similars”.
So, in other words, the red cape “image” is so clearly identifiable (unlike the natural disease the patient has which can be pretty murky), the immune system charges and makes fast work of it! The trick is that the “paper tiger” image the remedy/red cape embodies is a replica of the patient’s disease! When the immune system attacks the “paper tiger”, the real disease is unwittingly taken down as well!
Think of it like this. A substance like Arsenic, one of our most-often used remedies, would make you sick in certain clear ways if it were taken in overdose. We make a remedy out of Arsenic by watering it down to practically nothing and shaking it at intervals. At some point, there is going to be nothing left of the arsenic–just a hollow IMAGE of it, an “outline”, a “ghost” of Arsenic. It obviously can’t hurt you, but the immune system is still fooled by it! (“Oh my Gosh, look what just blew into town! It’s the Arsenicum Gang! Let’s go get them!”)
This explains our “law”: Like Cures Like. “Homeopathy” is a Greek word which means, “Same Disease”. They’re the same–the medicine and the disease! And then there’s our second “law”: The minimum dose. Our doses are so minimal, there’s often not even a single molecule of the original substance left in the solution! Why is that so important? No toxic effects to overwhelm the liver and kidneys! Besides, remember what it is we’re trying to do. We are aiming for an immune response, we’re just the matador; the bull does all the work! Homeopathy is an immune catalyst, all our remedies do is wave a big red flag! (“Look! It’s over here, the Arsenicum Gang! Go get them!”)
In the case of Nat-mur., if you’ve got a condition that can be caused by salt, then taking homeopathic salt (nat-mur) will cure it whether the problem is “too much” or “too little”. We have something in homeopathy we call “polarities”, meaning that if a remedy covers one end of a spectrum, it also covers the other end of the spectrum. So, we can give a “craves salt” remedy to a person who has an “aversion to salt” just as easily, because to us, it’s the same thing–an unbalanced response to this thing called salt.
Are Homeopaths Allowed to Use the “Disease” Rubrics?
Question: Elaine, my problem with Murphy’s Repertory is the Clinical Chapter where you can seemingly just look up the disease name and find the remedy. HUH? I thought that was against the rules! Isn’t that Allopathy?
No, no, no! Where do these ideas come from? It’s true, we don’t have “a remedy for this, and a remedy for that.” What we do have, though, is this: roughly 80% of the time, the remedy you need for a particular disease is in the disease rubric! Now, if your disease rubric has over 200 remedies in it, the way “Constipation” does, then this approach is meaningless! But, disease rubrics are not always useless! “Kidney Failure”, for example, has only 7 remedies in it, making this rubric extremely important!
Now, the “Influenza” rubric has 94 remedies in it but only 8 of them are in BOLD; and looking at them, it’s been rare that I haven’t needed one of these when faced with cases of the flu; in fact, more often than not, it’s Gelsemium, wouldn’t you agree? Here they are now:
As I said, around 80% of the time, these are your flu remedies! If none of them works, then you can go rooting around among the smaller remedies like Pyrogen and Arnica and see if they fit.
So, it’s in this context that you CAN make use of your disease rubrics; you’d be crazy not to! If there are 94 remedies in under “Flu”, then from 3,000 remedies, you’re down to 94, just by knowing that you have the flu! If the person has kidney failure, then from 3,000 remedies, you’re down to 7, just by having a diagnosis!
So what you do is, you look at the rubric, the disease rubric, and you ask yourself, “Of these remedies, which one has my etiology, modalities, concomitants, location and sensation, etc.?” When you add these things in, generally a remedy will come to the fore. One of these remedies will jump out at you.
Now, you remember your eczema case from yesterday? Despite the eczema rubric being rather large with 177 remedies, the one that cured your case wasn’t in there! And yet, we found it in the Materia Medica; showing us, once again, that the repertory is not complete! That’s why I said that 80% of the time you’ll find your remedy in the disease rubric, but not ALL the time! Even so, 80% is not bad! If the remedy you suspect is not in the rubric, just look for it in a good materia medica like Morrison’s or Murphy’s. Scroll down and lo and behold, you just may find that the symptom you were looking for is there; it was just never entered into the repertory!
Now, the other thing you have to do is determine if the chief complaint really IS the chief complaint! The person comes in for “eczema”, perhaps, but it turns out that the most limiting thing in his case is insomnia due to fear of the dark and ghosts! This changes everything, doesn’t it? Besides, whatever remedy has this fear is bound to have also “skin eruptions”, since every remedy in the Repertory does, just about! In other words, don’t start your case off with a big common symptom that every remedy has! I just looked up “skin: eruptions” and there are 261 remedies there!
Also, don’t do deep psychological probing when it’s clear that the chief complaint is due to something specific, like a drug side effect, fall-out from junk food and alcohol, and so on because we don’t always need to be looking for the deep constitutional remedy when it’s clear the complaint came from something outside of the patient. He may have caught a virus, drunk bad water, eaten bad food, sprained his ankle and so on. In that case, Murphy’s “Clinical” chapter is perfect, it gives you a structure within which to work.
More Questions About Junk Food
Question: Why is too much snack food not good for you?
Basically, snack food contains absolutely nothing that sustains life; and worse, it puts the body under stress due to all the added chemicals and lack of fiber and nutrients these foods are so famous for. It fills you up so you no longer have an appetite for “real” food; so, you are actually “starving” despite feeling “full”. The stress your body is under from consuming this “food” will ultimately lead to illnesses that you will have no way of attributing to anything you ate! The doctor will start treating you for random things–“depression”, “anxiety”, “ADHD” and so on, never knowing that the “food” caused it.
You will never guess in a million years that it’s the donuts, the ice cream, the pretzels, the chocolate bars, the soda, the lack of fiber, the MSG, the high fructose corn syrup, the GMO’s and so on that have given you arthritis or headaches or fainting spells. You’ll just think you were “attacked” by an illness and need to see a doctor, and he will start the flow of drugs that you’ll be “needing”, which cause problems of their own…. It’s a downward spiral that leads to diabetes, gout, kidney disease, cancer, liver failure and death, with no actual apparent “cause”, other than “snack food”.
Here’s my slogan:
Don’t Buy Corporate Food!
Corporate food is food that comes in a package with a famous brand-name label, the ingredients of which you have no control over because you didn’t pick them–someone else picked them for you! Why would you trust someone else to pick what goes into your food? Are they purchasing the best quality food items or the cheapest/worst quality? What do you think? And what are they adding to mask the poor quality of what they use? A flavor enhancer (MSG)? Lots of sugar? Artificial color to make the food look fresh? Do you see what I mean? Don’t let a corporation pick your food, as this is something you should be doing yourself!
Orange juice: What is preventing you from making your own orange juice? Do you know how inexpensive a citrus juicer is? Look at this:
Does that look expensive? You can also buy this:
But let me ask you, do you know what’s in this?
I don’t know either, and don’t wanna know! No, it doesn’t taste like orange juice! I do know one thing–it’s boiled! That’s what “pasteurized” means! Otherwise it would go bad. Real juice goes bad very quickly after juicing and has no shelf-life. Do you want to drink boiled juice? I don’t.
Start buying your own meat, your own potatoes, your own vegetables, your own rice, your own pasta, your own cheese…. and learn how to do something with them, it’s not that hard!
Always remember, the salad is the main dish! Take care, and see you next time….
Elaine Lewis, D.Hom. , C.Hom.
Write to Elaine at LEWRA@aol.com
Visit her website: elaineLewis.hpathy.com