I would very much like to be able to have access to the full spectrum of homeopathic vaccinations in some sort of a kit. Do you have any suggestions? My daughter who is currently 2 years old, was breast fed for over a year and now consumes raw milk daily, has never been sick other than a minor brief fever while teething and then again when she was acclimating to the local pollen. I would never vaccinate her nor my unborn child, so I would like to introduce their immune systems to what they need to help them be more fit for the onslaught of unhealthy individuals potentially carrying bad illness with them. Please let me know if you can help…
Before I answer your question, Brian, it reminds me that a large group of people in this country have started a “Green Our Vaccines” movement–in other words, “Make our vaccines safe!” So let me address that first. The truth is, vaccines cannot be made safe! Do you know why? You can’t grow these things, these viruses, in a sterile environment! In fact, this is a perfect metaphor for what really causes these diseases in the first place–filth!–and, by corollary, what the real prevention is–sanitation, proper diet and hygiene!
You can’t take a sterile, harmless medium, plop a virus in it, and expect it to grow, it won’t happen! And here’s the other problem, they grow these viruses in animals, and because of that, the virus is impossible to isolate, to separate from the animal itself! So, inevitably, part of the animal comes with the vaccine, and any issues the animal had, such as viruses, diseases and who-knows-what else. So, now that you’ve got “animal stuff” in your bloodstream, what happens next? Your immune system goes nuts because it’s foreign! You know that transplanted organs present a problem because the immune system attacks them, right? Well, why isn’t this a concern as well? It’s the same issue, foreign tissue in the body putting the immune system on constant mobilization. Now, I know what Brian is saying: “Can’t we make homeopathic remedies out of the vaccines? Won’t that solve the whole problem?”
Yes, we make remedies out of vaccines but that’s usually to antidote the damage the vaccine has caused. But you’re suggesting we give them as vaccine substitutes to prevent diseases like Measles, Mumps, etc. Every one of these diseases can be treated with homeopathic remedies, and for centuries we’ve been doing just that! Has anybody read Dorothy Shepherd’s Homeopathy In Epidemic Disease? Here’s an excerpt:
“In another private school, a child came back after the holidays with a fully developed whooping cough….All 12 of the children in her class were infected. The headmistress, on my advice, gave Pertussin 30C every four hours, and the children had the mildest attack of whooping cough she had ever seen. They enjoyed being ill, playing all the time in the orchard instead of having lessons.” (page 67)
Not only can we treat these diseases, but if we know an outbreak is coming, we can give the nosode in advance. We can give Influenzinum or Oscillococcinum at the start of flu season. But if a disease is out of the population, Brian, why would we be giving preventive remedies for it? That’s just bizarre! Are you planning to give your daughter Belladonna to prevent Scarlet Fever? Of course not!
If there’s no whooping cough going around, why give your child Pertussin 200C? It’s like giving any remedy for no reason; why would you do it? “Well, I just gave my daughter Tuberculinum 200C in case she ever gets Tuberculosis….” You see how absurd it is? What about the Plague, do we need a remedy for that? What about West Nile Virus? What about Dengue Fever? What about Malaria? Do we need a remedy for every Virus in the world? You mean to say that if we don’t give a remedy in advance, we’re going to wind up with all these viruses? We’re not? Then why do we think we’re going to wind up with the Measles?
Now, here’s the reality: When your child starts school or daycare, she will be exposed to a germ cocktail the likes of which you have never seen, take it from one who knows! It’s not whooping cough and measles you need to fear, it’s the kindergarten viruses, some of which will seem like exotic diseases from Africa! I caught everything Shana came home from school with. I was never so sick in my life as I was when Shana started pre-K! And then, just six months ago, two little kids came over to my house (thanks to their charming parents!) and I was told the next day that they were sick, and then a week later, I came down with some weird flu-like thing that was totally bizarre and completely awful! After that, I made an announcement, “No more little kids in my house!”
So, this is what you’re up against–it’s not polio and diphtheria….it’s real life viruses that will knock you right off your feet! Isn’t it odd that your doctor isn’t concerned about these in the least? Why is such a fuss being made about measles, mumps and rubella? Are they deadly? No! I’ve had two of those. Plus chicken pox. There’s no logic to what the medical profession is doing. Anyway, we’re homeopaths and we know how to cure these things!
Will you be ready with your homeopathic remedy kit and your acute prescribing book when some virus comes along? Do you even have a remedy kit? Do you have all the potencies you’re going to need? If not, get them now: www.a2zhomeopathy.com and buy an acute prescribing book too while you’re at it, because one is not much good without the other!
As for vaccinations? Every state has exemptions written into the law–medical, religious and philosophical. Just do a Google search for, “Vaccine exemptions for Pennsylvania” (or wherever you live). Usually you just have to submit a written statement to the school, such as, “In accordance with the vaccination laws of Pennsylvania, section A, subsection B, which state that this law does not pertain in the case of objection in writing on religious grounds, I hereby object in writing on religious grounds. Sincerely, Joe Schmo, parent of Kathleen Schmo.”
Elaine, if a patient comes to me with physical symptoms of one remedy and mental symptoms of another remedy, then what should I do? Do I find the cause and find the mental symptoms that are related to the disease? Would I prefer the mental remedy if related to the disease? Or give the physical remedy first?
Maryam from Pakistan
Maryam, your question is making me dizzy. But this actually happens all the time. A patient has a physical complaint, which is probably why he came in the first place, but then there’s the “personality” who has the complaint! That person is of a certain type, a certain character, when he’s NOT sick. Well, quite frankly, if I come to you with knee pain, and you start asking me about my childhood, I’m going to think you’re not paying attention to what’s wrong with me! If I injured my knee and can’t walk, you have to start asking me about my knee pain. After you’ve done all that, you might decide to give Arnica or Bryonia or Rhus tox or Ruta or Apis, etc. When the knee has stopped hurting, you can then give the remedy that matches my personality if I’ve bothered to stick around for that (chances are I won’t Maryam, nothing personal).
Now, on the other hand, if the knee pain is chronic and a mental issue has just come up, then the mental state gets treated first and the knee pain gets treated after. How’s that?
The Sensation Method
Elaine, I wonder if you would allow me to discuss and request your valued opinion on …how the following helps Homeopathy: Dr Rajan Sankaran’s philosphy based on ‘The Sensations in Homeopathy’ and subsequent classification into Kingdoms i.e Plant Animal and Mineral .. in total twelve books.
Many thanks …Ravi
I’ve read most of Sankaran’s books. They are, needless to say, very interesting, very long, very expensive… But seriously, he’s provided a lot of insightful information on materia medica and case-taking. However, I must say, I am not happy about what’s happened to acute prescribing in all of this. There is apparently no need for it anymore because, we are told by the Sensation Method, the “constitutional” remedy will cure the whole case, even the acute! You are therefore supposed to “use” the acute complaint to “enter” the case–the “real” case–which is not the acute case at all!
If a person says, “I’ve got hives, and they itch really bad,” instead of quickly discerning that this is an Apis case due to “worse hot applications” and the allergic etiology, the sensation method argues that you should instead take the patient on an exploration of his inner core by getting him to speak freely about what it means for him to have hives! If he has intense itching, explore what that’s like for him! What do these hives truly mean? In Sankaran’s book, The Other Song, a hives patient says the itch “…is like a punch!” So based on that the patient got Apis! What??? Oh yeah, listen, even Sankaran admits that the opportunities to pursue false leads in this method are endless! Not to mention the fact, did you know that Sankaran makes his patients fill out a very long questionnaire? So even before the patient is seen, Sankaran already knows the sensation, location, modalities, concomitants, etiology, etc., but, no one reading his books knows that! So, I mean, I could appear to be brilliant too if I had a questionnaire to go on before the patient sits down!
So, the Sensation followers tell me, “Oh, Sankaran doesn’t read the questionnaire, it’s just a formality.” Really? Do you have any idea how long that questionnaire is? And nobody reads it?! No, this is messed up, man!
For me, a case of hives means you ask: What are the modalities? What is the etiology? What does it look like, where is it located? No one asked this patient if the hives were better or worse for cold applications! This is the most important question in the case, because “better cold” means Apis (which is what was given), and that would have marked the end of the appointment! Instead, we had a two hour confusing case with false leads, like “The hives are like a punch!”
This is a 5 minute case! What is he teaching our students?
Read my Apis case “Attacked by Almonds”:
I’m surprised this Apis case even made it into his book because most Sensation cases are about remedies we’ve never even heard of! I often say to myself as I’m reading, “Don’t you people ever get a Lycopodium case?” Apparently, not; that’s what you’d have to conclude if you read his books! They get “Pig’s Blood” cases and “Atrax robustus” cases; but, this time I finally got my wish, a common remedy – an Apis case – arrived at in a totally bizarre manner, in a way that you could never replicate or teach! In other words, what should have been an easy acute case was drawn out at the risk of never finding the remedy! I would submit to you that he knew the remedy all along because he read the questionnaire! This was why he kept saying to the patient over and over again, “But what about insects?!” (Apis being the honey bee.)
If you want a book to read, make it: Homeopathic Medicine in the Home by Jonathan Breslow. It’s only $30.00 and you’ll learn how to solve practical cases–like allergic reactions.
Kingdoms. Here’s the problem. There are plants that act like animals! Some of them even bark and growl! Belladonna barks. Nux vomica is very aggressive and competitive and wants to come in first all the time; Anacardium would just as soon kill you as look at you and I just had a Hyoscyamus child who charged and leapt at people–these are all plants! Now, here’s another problem; lest we should forget, WE’RE ALL ANIMALS, and we’re all going to exhibit animal behavior to some degree. I have heard people say things like, “I think it’s an animal remedy because she’s showing concern for her kids.” OMG. If this is what people are thinking, this “method” has gone too far.
I’m a very tolerant person. I am fine with the Sensation method, I’m glad it’s here, I’m glad Sankaran is here! But people have to learn to do acute prescribing; it is ludicrous if students are being taught that if someone comes in with hives, you have to take a 2 hour case, risk following false leads, and maybe never help this person!
Can Water Potencies Be Taken Daily?
I thought that in a chronic case, water potencies could be taken on a regular basis, even without acute need (Got that from Dr. Luc De Schepper, but with LM’s).
No, absolutely not. I know that people think LM’s can be taken every day; but, the operant word here is CAN–if needed. See below:
1. First dose of a remedy: Always wait 24 hours to make sure there’s going to be no aggravation.
2. Typical, standard dosing schedule:
6C, three times a day;
9C: twice a day;
12C: once or twice a day;
15C: once a day;
30C: once a day or as needed;
LM/1 once a day;
200C: one dose and wait–could possibly last a month or even longer,
same with all high potencies.
Number of succussions before each dose: 5.
3. However, having said all that, here are the “buts”:
Any striking improvement precludes further dosing! Repeat only at the first sign of relapse.
4. If there’s an aggravation, stop the remedy. If the aggravation is unbearable, do “the aggravation zapper” (https://hpathy.com/homeopathy-papers/the-aggravation-zapper/). An improvement may follow the aggravation. If it does, and knowing you aggravated the last time, take the next dose, when needed, in the third cup after 2 succussions of the bottle.
What do I mean by “the 3rd cup” (or second cup or fifth cup, etc.?)
Instead of dosing directly from the bottle, succuss your bottle as always but then fill up a disposable cup with water, add a capful from your remedy bottle to the cup, dump 90% of it out, refill with water, dump out again, refill and stop after the third time; now, take a sip from the cup–the 3rd cup.
So, the answer is YES, you can take water doses every day–depending on the potency, depending on the response to the previous dose and depending on the intensity of the complaint.
I have a client right now who has to take a 1M every other day–but we started the case with 9C! We got up to 1M because that’s where the patient’s response to the remedy and the intensity of the complaint led us! That’s when we really got results, at 1M. It wasn’t a theory I had! We adapted to the patient’s needs. His body told us what to do. And we quickly determined that the complaint was way too intense for anything lower than a 1M. You do what has to be done to get the case under control, then you back off; you don’t keep going full tilt once you’ve gotten the case under control. It’s like once you know you’re going to make it to the airport on time, you can slow down!
& What Happens After Taking A Remedy
Can you summarize your case management in acute and chronic cases (if different)?
Besides what I already said? The only thing I would add is, in chronic cases, if you get an acute–an injury, a virus, a fright, etc.–stop taking your chronic remedy!
Take the case of the acute and treat that (Aconite 200C, for example, for a fright). When you’re back to normal, and the chronic case is still in evidence, go back on your chronic remedy.
One might ask: How do you know your “acute” isn’t a “return of old symptoms”? Ask yourself, “Is this like that bladder infection I had a year ago that I took an antibiotic for?” If so, your choices are to do nothing and it might go away all by itself in a short time; or, if you don’t think you can stand waiting, take the case of the bladder infection, stop the chronic remedy, give the cystitis remedy–Cantharis, Nux v., Sarsaparilla, Sepia, etc.–and when the symptoms are gone, see if you still need your chronic remedy. If you do, go back on it.
Again, as previously stated, a striking improvement precludes further dosing. Dose again at the first sign of relapse.
Potencies will and do wear off! Be ready with the next potency for this inevitability. I don’t know how many people have said to me, “Homeopathy didn’t work, I tried it!” when all that happened was, their potency wore off! You have to expect this!
The development of proving symptoms usually means you are done with your chronic remedy or you are over-dosing, so stop taking it.
If you’re experiencing “exteriorization” (the disorder moving out of the mental plane and onto the physical plane), how do you know that that’s what it is, and not an acute of some sort? You’ll know it’s exteriorization because you will feel better mentally and emotionally or at a deeper physical level! After the right remedy, you should feel a lifting of the spirits, and a sense of calm (the things we call “the signs of health”). If this happens, ignore everything else! We are now focused on that lifting of the spirits and that sense of feeling “centered”. If that starts to relapse, that’s when we’d want you to redose. Don’t keep dosing if you’re experiencing “the signs of health”–unless you start to relapse.
We expect discharging, of one sort or another, after a remedy. Again, if you sense an improvement at a deeper level, ignore the discharging! It could be crying. It could be a runny nose or a skin rash. Just expect it and do nothing, it will go away. You will surely feel better after the discharging! However, in “The Aggravation Zapper”, Diane Fuller gives an example of a case where the discharging (diarrhea) went on and on so Diane zapped the remedy (Phosphorus) and the diarrhea stopped; but the good news was, the good work the remedy was doing continued on despite the “zapping”.
In acutes? The thing to remember is, you may need a high potency depending on how serious the situation is, and it may need to be repeated often. Always have the remedy in water and succuss five times before each dose. Also, you may need more than one remedy. A Gelsemium flu may change to Belladonna after you give Gelsemium. Belladonna is a healthier state than Gelsemium. I once saw a Bryonia flu change to Phosphorus after Bryonia was given. Usually one remedy is all you need; but, you never know, so, be prepared and don’t just blindly keep giving a remedy when you see that the case has changed into something else!
So, I’m running out of steam here, I hope that’s something of an answer for you.
Asthma Case: Make A Remedy Out Of An Inhaler?
I have a 45 yr. male asthmatic patient addicted to his inhaler which he takes 1X/day. I tried to make him his own Rx from the inhaler but the inhaler is enclosed and the only way to get it out is by inhaling strongly by mouth. There is no leakage available for the sample to make the Rx.
What if he inhaled, immediately swished water in his mouth, and spit in a cup; do you think the medicine would be in the saliva? Also, check at www.Ainsworths.com, they sell potentized prescription drugs!
Now, I assume you mean that when he stops using his inhaler, he has an asthma attack. Have you tried finding a remedy for the kind of attack he has?
Questioner: Asthma/constant runny nose/phlegm (green/white/yellow), wet cough…inhaler either at 4 pm or 10 pm (one time). Appetite good, thin, sleep good, not tired…delightful man.
Is this your “case”? There’s no case here! There’s nothing here to prescribe on. What’s the sensation? Where are the modalities? One way to get modalities is to ask, “What does this attack make you do?” Let me give you an example of an asthma case-taking:
“Dear patient, you have asthma, tell me about your asthma attacks. What does the attack make you do?”
“I have to sit up and lean forward, I have to have cold water! I have to open all the windows! I have to turn on the fan! I have to stand in front of the air conditioner!”
“What’s the sensation?”
“It feels like I’m choking! It feels like there’s a weight on my chest. If I cough up mucus I feel better.”
“What does the mucus look like?”
“It’s long and stringy.”
“How long has it been going on? What was the initial cause?”
“It started after I used an ointment to suppress a fungal rash.”
“What will bring an attack on?”
“What’s the time modality?”
“Every night at 3 A.M.”
“My nose starts running.”
Read my article, “Acute Prescribing in Homeopathy” it might help you find a remedy for this patient’s asthma attacks so that you won’t need to potentize his inhaler:
Why You Shouldn’t Suppress Skin Eruptions
I’ve got genital herpes; and, quite frankly, I can’t figure out how the swollen, hard, red lumps that start bleeding and make me feel crazy with burning pain are something my immune system is doing for my benefit! Please explain.
Let’s take the example of syphilis. What’s the chancre sore for, why is it there? Why does the body do that, create such a thing? To answer my own question, the body actually consigns the disease, which is system-wide, to that sore, to keep the disease away from the vital organs. And the same thing can be said for any eruption or growth for whatever reason. Here is an excerpt from Hahnemann’s Chronic Diseases, with my “translation” interspersed in italics:
And now, heeeeeeeeeeere’s Hahnemann!
The chancre appears, after an impure coition, usually between the seventh and fourteenth day, rarely sooner or later, mostly on the member infected with the miasma, first as a little pustule, which changes into an impure ulcer with raised borders and stinging pains, which if not cured remains standing on the same place during man’s lifetime, only increasing with the years, while the secondary symptoms of the venereal disease, syphilis, cannot break out as long as it exists.
The sore appears one or two weeks after sex with an infected partner. The sore will never go away on its own. As long as it is there untouched, syphilis cannot break out in the body. It’s as if the sore is a form of protection!
In order to help in such a case, the Allopathic physician destroys this chancre,
The doctor, who’s an idiot, does not realize the sore is there for protection and attempts to remove it….
by means of corroding, cauterizing and desiccating substances, wrongly conceiving it to be a sore arising merely from without through a local infection,
The doctor thinks the sore originated from without, not from within….
thus holding it to be a merely local ulcer, such also is it declared to be in their writings. They falsely suppose, that when it appears, no internal venereal disease is as yet to be thought of…
The doctor thinks that if he works fast and gets rid of this sore, the disease won’t spread to the rest of the body!
When locally exterminating the chancre, they suppose that they remove all the venereal disease from the patient at once, if only he will not permit this ulcer to remain too long in its place, so that the absorbent vessels do not get time to transfer the poison into the internal organism, and so cause by delay a general infection of the system with syphilis. They evidently do not know, that the venereal infection of the whole body commenced with the very moment of the impure coition, and was already completed before the appearance of the chancre.
The doctor does not know that at the very moment of intercourse, syphilis permeated the whole body, even before the appearance of the sore!
The Allopathic doctor destroys, in his blindness, through local applications, the vicarious external symptom (the chancre ulcer), which kind nature intended for the alleviation of the internal extensive venereal general disease;
The sore is put there by the body itself–a consignment of the disease to the surface, away from the vital organs. It is the vicarious expression of the disease. It’s as if the body were able to bundle up the disease, put it in a trash bag, and plop it on the surface of the skin. As long as no one messes with it, the person will be fine!
…and so he inexorably compels the organism to replace the destroyed first substitute of the internal venereal malady (the chancre) by a far more painful substitute, the bubo, which hastens onward to suppuration; and when the Allopath, as is usually the case, also drives out this bubo through his injurious treatment, then nature finds itself compelled to develop the internal malady through far more troublesome secondary ailments, through the outbreak of the whole chronic syphilis, and nature accomplishes this, though slowly, (frequently not before several months have elapsed), but with unfailing certainty. Instead of assisting, therefore, the Allopath does injury.
But, as we all know, skin eruptions are NEVER allowed to stay where they are in allopathic medicine! Doctors are very freaked out by skin eruptions, they MUST get rid of them–whether by creams or ointments, or cauterizing or freezing or surgery! The immune system now is in a panic, what to do? The eruption has been removed, what does the body do with the syphilis now? Well, it swells up a gland and this is called a “bubo”. Needless to say, the doctor gets rid of that too, and now the patient really DOES have syphilis, at long last!
I have never, in my practice of more than fifty years, seen any trace of the venereal disease break out, so long as the chancre remained untouched in its place, even if this were a space of several years (for it never passes away of itself), and even when it had largely increased in its place, as is natural in time with the internal augmentation of the venereal disorder, which increase takes place in time in every chronic miasma.
The disease never breaks out if you leave the sore alone, even though the sore gets bigger and bigger over time, it doesn’t matter. (Hopefully you can see that the body isn’t as arbitrary with what it does as you might have thought.)