Mrs. Elsy John writes:
Elaine, I would like to air my confusion when I say that sometimes, a well selected remedy fails to act, which leaves the patient, as well as the doctor, desperate. What can make homeopathic treatment fool-proof?
Mrs. Elsy John
Well, Mrs. J, let me just say that I don’t have the foggiest idea!
Homeopathy is very difficult! You mentioned “well-selected remedies.” I don’t even know what that means! Let me give you an example. My friend “Camille” called me the other day and told me she had a pain in the neck, and assured me that I was not the cause of it! I found that hard to believe; but anyway, I had no idea what the remedy for her neck pain could be; I asked her all the usual questions about which side the pain was on, what the sensation was, what made it better or worse, and so on; I wasn’t happy with the remedies that came up, and then it dawned on me to ask, “What was going on in your life when you first noticed the pain, did any stressful event occur?” I wasn’t prepared for the answer–I think because I wasn’t expecting her to say anything other than what people usually say in answer to that, “Nothing!”
Instead, she described her sister-in-law coming over and crying and saying, “I know you don’t like me!” OMG! Talk about mortification!
So, I looked in the Repertory under, “Ailments from Emotions”, “Ailments from Mortification”, “Ailments from Embarrassment”, “Ailments from guilt” and came up with Ignatia, and guess what? It worked!!!!!!
Now, is Ignatia a “well-selected remedy” for neck pain? Not especially. Practically every remedy from Artemesia to Zinc is listed under neck pain! Do you see what I mean when I say I have no idea what a well-selected remedy is? You have to ask the right questions!
Here’s another example. Someone wrote into the discussion forum some time ago asking what to give her five-year-old for a sinus headache. She said her son had a sinus headache every day!!! I could have done the expected thing and said, “Give a dose of Kali bich. 30C,” but instead I asked, as above, “When did it start and what was going on in his life at the time that it started?”
What we found out was, the “sinus” headache started after he had taken antibiotics for the flu! (OMG!) (Do you see the damage that drugs cause? Not to mention the fact that antibiotics are totally ineffective against the flu!)
Anyway, the question then became, what was the flu like before the antibiotics were given? It turned out to have been a perfect Gelsemium flu! So that’s what we gave– Gelsemium– and the “sinus headache” went away. Is Gelsemium a well-selected remedy for sinusitis? Not really, but then again, we didn’t really have a sinusitis as thought. We had a suppressed flu!
Now of course, one reason a remedy might not work is because you have the wrong potency. Again, using “Camille” as an example, her son D______ was plagued with ingrown toenails (Homeopathy Treatment for Ingrown Toenail) for most of his life. The reason I knew what remedy to give was because he had previously seen another homeopath who gave Silica 10M and it had worked to a minor degree. I was shocked by such a high potency, but encouraged that it worked “somewhat”. To me, that suggested that if a lower potency were given, it might be the correct remedy after all. I recommended Silica 6X four times a day. Camille misunderstood and got Silica 6C, but it didn’t matter, because it worked anyway, in about 2 weeks’ time, and saved D______ from having a second surgery for ingrown toenails.
You see, it was a chronic case, a life-long problem, for which a 10M is not well suited. 10M’s are suited for severe, intense presentations. In one of our Quizzes, Kelly’s son did acrobatics with his bike and landed on his head! Now that called for Arnica 10M, and the child was relaxed and pain-free within 15 minutes! That potency was perfect, ideal; but not ideal for an ingrown toenail.
Now, if you read our article by Dr. Stuart Close in this very issue of the ezine and you read his cases at the bottom, you will note that more often than not, the remedy he chose for the case was the causal agent in potency! In one case, a patient was given colchicum as a drug by the hospital, as was apparently common at that time, and when Dr. Close realized the patient had been poisoned by colchicum, he prescribed…ta-da!…Colchicum 30C! In another case, a patient was dying because of doctor-prescribed arsenic; so Dr. Close prescribed…of course…Arsenicum 30C! When you know what the cause is? That’s the remedy! (More likely than not.) Learn to make remedies out of things, you might have to do it some day. I’ve written an article on it called: How To Make Your Own Remedy
When remedies work, then fail, you have to try a higher potency, but if that doesn’t work and you move on to a different remedy, and, in the same fashion, that works and then fails as well, and this pattern keeps repeating itself, you need a nosode!
A nosode is a remedy made from the disease. You also need a nosode when all you have are the common symptoms of the disease, or the case seems to match every remedy and no remedy in particular. Maybe this nosode is already a homeopathic remedy, like Medorrhinum or Tuberculinum, or maybe what you have is some strange bacterial infection that defies explanation or identification; in that case, you have to make a remedy from the patient’s body, from some discharge the patient has. Where is the disease manifesting–the saliva, the sweat? The blood? Mucus? That’s what you have to make a remedy out of! You don’t need a lot of volume to make a remedy, one drop is enough.
Why else might a remedy not work? Because you’re prescribing on mentals that aren’t a part of the case. You’ve ignored the pathology because maybe it’s just not appealing to you. Periodontal disease? Not very interesting! Sprained ankle? Joint pain? Borrring! Well, the juicy constitutional case will have to wait until these “loose ends” are tied up! As long as there is something “blocking” a clear path to the constitution, the remedy will not work, might aggravate, or might work but relapse constantly, necessitating higher and higher potencies with no final resolution.
Also, if you’re trying to treat an acute and you’ve mixed up the constitutional symptoms with the acute case, you’re most likely going to wind up with a hodge-podge with no single remedy coming to the fore; so, keep the chronic and acute cases separate.
Often you’ll be presented with a case that seems to have literally a million symptoms! You’ll marvel at how many diseases a patient can possibly have and still live to tell about it! What will you do? You can say to the patient, “What’s the worst thing?” The idea is to start with the greatest suffering, and then, of course you’ll want to move on to the next worst thing after that. And, since healing takes place in reverse order, according to Hering’s Law, you could ask the patient, “What’s the most recent trauma or symptom that’s befallen you?” and start there. You may find that that’s also “the worst thing”.
You know, it could also be that you’ve misjudged the cause of the symptoms. Without a diagnosis, or perhaps there has been a misdiagnosis, you could be selecting a remedy for muscle spasms when your patient really has kidney stones!
Also, if you are prescribing based on a lab test? That will do you no good if the case has no symptoms. If a lab test comes up positive and there are no symptoms, give the constitutional remedy.
Now, what else could cause a remedy to fail? You’ve got a patient with, let’s say, cancer, and you note that he’s depressed, so you prescribe on the mentals like you’ve always been taught to do, and you give Nat-mur., and it doesn’t work, or it does work for the depression but the cancer doesn’t change. Well, here’s one more surprise: when there’s pathology in a case, the standard hierarchy of “mentals come first” is no longer applicable! Actually, you turn it on its head! The person is depressed because he’s sick; he’s not sick because he’s depressed. We have to find a cancer remedy, remedies like: Conium, Cadmium sulph., Hydrastis, Phytolacca, Cundurango, Carbo animalis…. In other words, you can’t give the constitutional remedy here unless, for example, you’ve got an Arsenicum patient with an Arsenicum cancer; or, you’ve got a Phosphorus patient with a Phosphorus cancer, then, that works out perfectly but you’re not always so lucky! Another thing in cancer cases, don’t expect there to be just one remedy; the case may change constantly! You’re going to have to be ready constantly with a remedy for this and a remedy for that; these cases are unstable. Don’t think you can give a 200C and say, “Come back in a month!” You may find yourself taking an acute case daily from this patient, or weekly, and then returning to Hydrastis or Conium, etc. where you started.
Here’s another problem with constantly relapsing mental cases: if a vital organ is in danger, the vital force (the body’s innate logic) will dispatch the disorder away from the vital organ to the mental plane to save the person’s life! In such a case, you will never succeed by treating this as a mental case because your initial successes will constantly relapse. I will give you an example. Dr. Vasilis Ghegas tells of a pneumonia case he successfully treated. But when his patient relapsed, instead of calling Dr. Ghegas, the patient’s family took her to a “real” doctor who gave antibiotics. The result was that the patient became “insane” and had to be institutionalized. Finally they came to Dr. Ghegas who said, “I will give her a remedy but the pneumonia will come back. Then you must call me when that happens.” Obviously Dr. Ghegas would repeat his pneumonia remedy at that time. The pneumonia came back like Dr. Ghegas said. But what did the family do? The so-called “safe” and “responsible” thing, took the patient to the hospital where she got, again, antibiotics, she again went insane, was re-institutionalized, and they never contacted Dr. Ghegas again. So, the whole point of this story being that a “mental” case may not be a mental case as you might think! It could be a physical illness that was improperly treated with drugs and suppressed to the mental plane. Yeah, pretty complicated; and for that matter, any physical complaint could in reality be a different complaint that was suppressed to the vital organs with drugs. Drugs are very dangerous and can make a homeopath’s job quite daunting.
Another problem: Your patient might be too toxic to respond to the homeopathic remedy. Too many drugs may have depressed his vital force; therefore, your first remedy might be found under “Generals: reaction, lack of” (lack of reaction). Also consider the remedies for antidoting drugs like Nux vomica and Avena sativa. Often times when there are a lot of drugs in the case causing problems, you’re looking at Nux vomica.
Why else could your remedy be failing? Maybe because your patient won’t tell you what’s really wrong! Lachesis is too suspicious to tell you the truth! Nat-mur is too dignified to volunteer anything personal. Staphysagria doesn’t want to be a bother! Sepia’s are too exhausted to talk and Nux vomica and Sulphur are in too much of a hurry! But moreover, sometimes people simply aren’t able to communicate! Sometimes you just get the feeling they are deliberately not answering you, just not getting the idea of the homeopathic interview on purpose! Needless to say, these cases are exasperating and cure may come only after a long stretch of trial and error!
Don’t forget the concomitant! The clue to the case often lies in the concomitant symptom, which is the “other” symptom in the case. The person with the headache also has….what? Nausea? Frequent urination? Thirst? Irritability? Runny eyes? Excessive salivation?…these are all concomitants–the symptom that’s associated with the complaint. The headache patient with thirst may need Phosphorus. The headache patient with salivation may need Mercury. The headache patient with a need for company may need Arsenicum. The headache patient with frequent urination may need Gelsemium. In other words, suddenly the case is all about the concomitant!
Colors! Colors often sway the remedy choice. I didn’t know what to give my friend Juliana for her cold until she told me her nose mucus was “Electric Yellow”! I screamed, “Kali bich!”! And it was Kali bich! This is called prescribing on keynotes. If you see a keynote in a case, or a strange, rare and peculiar symptom, you may be able to prescribe just on that!
Maybe you antidoted the remedy by giving a second dose too soon! Or maybe you caused a proving by dosing too often! If a remedy has begun to act, stop giving it! Your next dose might ruin the case!
Sometimes the remedy didn’t fail at all, we just didn’t know how to recognize a curative response! We may be looking for the physical pathology to change when actually the first thing you’ll see after a remedy is improvement on the mental-emotional plane, or sleep, or renewed appetite! When we don’t see what we want, we abandon the remedy when it could have been the right one all along!
Aggravation? Well, first of all, stop taking the remedy! But, if the chief complaint is worse after the remedy, that can be a hopeful sign that maybe when the aggravation wears off, the improvement will then follow.
I’ve left the most obvious reason a remedy can fail for last: You antidoted it with peppermint, menthol or coffee! There are a number of things that can antidote a remedy, but chief among them is menthol! People who have given a remedy for a cough and then apply Vicks Vap-O-Rub to the chest are probably just cancelling out the remedy! Antidoting factors include: mint, menthol, aroma therapy, coffee, strong emotions–and by the way, this is why I always tell people, especially parents, “Stop fighting with your son, you just gave him a remedy!” Other antidoting factors: dentistry and electric blankets.
Well Mrs. John? Have we covered the issues you raised? Yes, I know, homeopathy is harder than you thought! And this is why non-practitioners should not think that they can treat themselves unless it’s an acute case. Stick to acute prescribing, and leave the rest to those who have gone to a school of homeopathy. As you can see, it’s not easy.