Scientific Research

Delocalization of Electrons Through Orientations of Water Molecules Helps Electrical Conduction In Water

Drs. Ruhul Amin and Biplab Chakraborty make the case that it is not ions but delocalization of electrons in water molecules that conduct electrical energy through orientations of water molecules.

Most metals are very good conductors of electricity. In metals, electrical conduction arises by the movement of electrons, unlike the mechanism of conduction in aqueous solutions or fused melts of ionic compounds, where ions migrate during conduction.

The very property of water to convey the medicinal effect of a substance through retention and conveyance of electrical impulses is of great importance, not only for homeopathy but for the development of Science1. It is well known that conductance of electrical energy is a flow of electrons for metals, through ions in aqueous solution or water, and through holes in semiconductors.

It is said that the metallic bond which is responsible for holding/bonding  atoms of a metal or metals (for alloys) together, helps movement of electrical  energy through available electrons in its conduction band. In other words, delocalized electrons in the conduction band, help the flow of electrical energy. In the Molecular Orbital Theory the valence electrons are considered to be associated with all the nuclei concerned, as atomic orbitals combine to produce molecular orbitals. A brief discussion regarding conduction in conductors and semiconductors is presented here:


In electrical conductors (metals), either the valence band is only partly full, or the valence and conduction bands overlap. There is therefore no significant gap between filled and unfilled Molecular Orbitals (MO), and perturbation can occur readily.

For the Lithium molecule with configuration 1S2 2S1, if n atoms of Li are present in a Lithium crystal, then n 2S atomic orbitals combine to form n 2S molecular orbitals. Now the total valence electrons being n, they will find their place in the n/2 MO (as each MO can accommodate 2 electrons) and hence there will be n/2 filled MO and n/2 vacant MO Fig 1.


But in Beryllium with electronic configuration 1S2 2S2 , if there  are  n atoms of Be in a crystal combine they will combine to form n 2S MO. As the total number of valence electrons in the Be crystal is nX 2 it may be assumed that they all will be accommodated in the n2S MO (as each MO can accommodate 2 electrons). But this is not the fact, since in an isolated Be atom the 2S and 2p atomic orbitals are  some 60 Kj mol-1 different in energy and in the same way as 2s AOs form a band of MOs, the 2p AOs (atomic orbitals) form a 2p band of MOs. The upper part of the 2s band overlaps with the lower part of the 2p band. Because of this overlap of the bands, some of the 2p band is occupied and some of the 2s band is empty Fig 2.


In both the cases it is found as if there is a single energy band with no forbidden gap (Fig 1A & Fig 2A). Consequently if any electron at the top of the filled portion of the band gains a little extra energy, say under the influence of electric field, it can easily move up into the empty part of the energy band. So now the electron being free to move in the crystal, may be termed a free electron.

Non-Metal conductor: In graphite only three of the valence electrons of each carbon atom are involved in forming sp2 hybrid bonds, the fourth electron forming  a π bond. The π electrons in graphite are mobile, shared by a whole layer of carbon atoms and hence conduct electricity.


Insulators: The conditions for a crystalline substance to be an insulator at room temperature are

a)     Its valence band must be full

b)    The conduction band must be normally empty

c)     The forbidden gap must be greater than about 1eV.


In diamond, which is colourless, each carbon atom utilizes sp3 hybrid orbitals to form four bonds. Thus each carbon atom is tetrahedrally bonded to four other carbon atoms and a three dimensional polymer is formed .


The energy band diagram (Fig 3) shows that it requires about 6eV of energy to move an electron from the valence band to the conduction band, whereas average energy possessed by an electron at room temperature i.e 300K is somewhat less  than the required value. Therefore, diamond is a very good insulator at room temperature. An electric field cannot give this amount of energy to an electron in the solid (diamond).Thus no electron could acquire sufficient kinetic energy to cross the forbidden gap in the electric field. Therefore there will be no flow of electrical energy and the solid will be an insulator. But as average energy possessed by the electron rises with temperature, quite a good number of electrons cross the forbidden gap and thus conductivity of diamond increases with temperature.


Semi conductors : Actually a semiconductor has the energy band structure very similar to that of an insulator, with the only difference that in the semi conductor , the conduction and the valence band are separated by a narrow forbidden gap of about 1eV (fig 4). As in diamond, an energy gap separates the top of the filled valence energy band from a vacant higher band (conduction band). But the forbidden gap for Germanium and Silicon are 0.76eV and 1.1eV respectively. At low temperatures the conductivity of Silicon is very low. Since the energy gap is small even at room temperature, a small fraction of electrons in the valence band have sufficient kinetic energy owing to thermal agitation to cross the relatively small energy gap to enter the conduction band above it. The fractions are however sufficient to permit flow of limited amounts of electrical energy when an electric field is applied. Thus Silicon, having electrical conductivity lying between that of conductors and insulators, is considered a semiconductor.


The theory of conduction of electrical energy in water or aqueous solution  got questioned when it was shown that solutions ionic or non-ionic conduct electrical energy through the orientation of water molecules2. But still the vital question remained how the orientation of water molecules could help such conduction of electrical energy.  To help explain conductivity of electrical energy in water the following experiment is performed:

Experiment: An LED is connected to a  9 volt battery through a pair of graphite electrodes (Gr X & Gr Y) immersed in distilled water. Five Graphite electrodes  Gr A, Gr B, Gr C, Gr D & Gr E are placed at different positions (about 3cm apart) in a beaker as shown in Fig 5.The emf of different pairs of electrodes (A,B,C,D &E) are measured before and after passing electrical energy through the circuit containing the LED. Results are recorded in the table below at 2minutes, 4mins & 6 mins:


ElectrodeInitial emf

Final emf on passing electrical energy(in mV)

Resultant emf (in mV)

Pairs(in mV)At  2minutesAt  4 minutesAt  6 minutesAt 2minsAt 4 minsAt 6 mins

















































































Discussion: In this experiment when the current is allowed to pass through the  circuit containing the LED, it is believed that the LED glows due to the passage of electrical energy through the ions present in distilled water. The ions being neutralized at the opposite electrodes while conveying current i.e, H3O+ ions move towards Cathode (negative electrode) while OH move to the Anode (positive electrode). From the result shown in the table, two things are not clear:

i)                   Why the ions move to the relatively neutral electrodes ( A,B,C,D &E) to generate such emf ?

ii)                Why and how the presence of ions in water generates different emf for different pairs of graphite electrodes?

Had the emf shown by different pairs of Graphite electrodes been due to ions in water, they should have been nearly the same, if not equal. It is also not clear why Graphite A behaves always as a positive electrode while Graphite E is never positive but always negative. A graph is plotted for emf generated by a pair of electrodes at 2 mins, 4mins & 6mins.


It shows that emf generated by the electrode pairs A to E is in the order A-E>A-D>A-C>A-B. That shows that negativity of the electrodes is in the order E>D>C>B>A.  i.e, E is at relatively highest negative potential .

For the pairs B to E, emf generated is in the order B-E>B-D>B-C that again shows that negativity of the electrodes is in the order E>D>C>B.  i.e, E is at relatively highest negative potential.

Similarly for the pairs C to E where C-E> D-E, again E is at relatively highest negative potential.

It therefore appears that Gr A being closest to Positive electrode of the circuit containing the LED is always positive and is always at relatively positive potential whereas Gr E being closest to the negative electrode of the circuit containing the LED is always at relatively negative potential, while the rest are intermediate in nature. So,  B, C  & D are negative with respect to A but are positive with respect to E.

About the author

Ruhul Amin & Biplab Chakraborty

Ruhul Amin & Biplab Chakraborty

Dr. Ruhul Amin MD is a Homeopathic physician & mental health professional, performing research work on homeopathy since 1998. The first work being on Diabetes Mellitus Type II and its homeopathic treatment, followed by Parkinsonism, Respiridone & Homeopathy and for the last eleven years concentrating strictly on the Homeopathic Dilution and its Scientific basis, along with chemist Biplab Chakraborty M Sc. Visit their


Biplab Chakraborty,M.Sc is a chemist from Calcutta University, previously a serious Critic of Homeopathic Dilution. . With this view he started research work along with Dr. Ruhul Amin for the last eleven years, finally being converted into a serious supporter of homeopathy. He along with Dr. Md.Ruhul Amin published papers on Homeopathic Dilution & its scientific Basis. These papers clearly reflect the contradiction within the modern science itself.

Leave a Comment


  • As a patient who has found in homeopathy the most fascinating path towards healing ever experienced in his lifetime, I set out years ago to try and understand a bit more about it. I found some books by Scholten and De Schepper especially eye-opening, not to mention the great “The Genius of Homeopathy” by Stuart Close. Yet none of them said much about HOW homeopathy works.

    I’m also interested in physics, and through the years I made the effort to read quite a few books on the subject. Little did I know that as I delved deeper into both physics and homeopathy, I’d come to realize that the former holds the key to understanding at least part of the mystery that surrounds the latter.

    I find current research in homeopathy extremely interesting, since it’s trying to bridge the gap between the two disciplines, leveraging the latest discoveries in physics to explain how homeopathy is able to achieve its miraculous effects – provided the correct remedy is chosen and administered in the right potency and dose.

    Nowadays, studies on the memory of water – brilliantly synthesized by Massimo Citro in his recent book “The Basic Code of the Universe”, which will remain among my favourite books ever – seem to reveal so much more than we thought we could know about the mystery of homeopathy. And what I like so much about this field of research is that, at least in my opinion, it’s not depriving this medicine of its magic: on the contrary, once you learn about the unexpected properties of water, you’re left even more in awe with respect to the laws of the magnificent universe we inhabit.

    Having said that, I would have enjoyed this particular article even more if it had stated more explicitly the relationship between the presented findings and the inner workings of homeopathy. Although this is a quite technical piece, one should keep in mind that the general public might also be interested enough to read it – and those of us who are neither physicists, nor certified homeopaths might need a little more guidance to grasp the significance of these discoveries for the field of homeopathy.

    This minor detail won’t stop me from expressing my heartfelt congratulations to the writers, and to anyone committed to finally laying a firm scientific foundation for homeopathy. Since centuries of successful clinical experience apparently are not enough to neutralize the usual naysayers, let’s see if some groundbreaking discovery does the work! 🙂

  • A very well researched article, Late Dr Jacques Benveniste did some excellent research on memory of water but the world instead of encouraging him treated him so inhumanly that he died later with a broken heart.But such research one day will establish the working of Homeopathy and pave the way for its future glory.

    Dr Wequar Ali Khan

    Miami Florida