Scientific Research

Delocalization of Hydrated Electrons Conduct Electrical Energy in Water or Aqueous Solutions

Ruhul Amin and Biplab Chakraborty report on their research into the conduction of electrical currents in water.

The study of water has revealed its mysterious behavior not only in respect of its physical or chemical properties but its electrical properties too. The theory of homeopathy being directly related to the electrical properties of water, much attention is being given to explore those properties, including conduction, retention and generation of electrical energy. In our earlier work we have shown that the mode of action of micro current therapy and homeopathic dilution seem to be the same, i.e. without any involvement of molecules and exclusively due to micro current /electrical strain induced at the cellular level.1

Delocalization of valence electrons and Pi electrons are said to conduct electrical energy in metals and graphite (non-metals) respectively. We have shown in our previous publications that ions do not conduct electrical energy2 in water or aqueous solution and it is yet to be identified which electrons are actually delocalized through orientations of water molecules for conducting electrical energy. Now, in search of the same we proceeded with the following experiments.


Materials Used: Adapter (220 volts AC to 12 volts DC, 500mA), A step down transformer (220 volts AC to 50 volts AC, 500mA), graphite rods, Zinc plate LED’s (low voltage range), glass bowl, meter, distilled water and NaCl.


Experiment 1:  A source of 12 volts DC (actually about 14.5 volts DC,500mA) from an adapter is connected to two Graphite electrodes (GrA & GrB) ,placed in 15 ml of distilled water contained in a glass bowl, through a switch. The positive terminal of the battery is connected to GrA while the negative terminal to Gr B. Two Graphite rods GrC & GrD are placed just opposite to GrA & GrB respectively . An LED (Light Emitting Diode) is also connected to GrC & GrD along with a meter as shown in Fig 1.


Observations: When the circuit is closed and the current is allowed through the circuit, observations are noted in the tabular form below. The observations are noted once again after addition of 2 drops of 8% of Sodium Chloride solution in the distilled water with gentle mixing to obtain a dilute salt solution (0.0533% or 0.00091N) in the container.

Table 1:

Sl No.Applied emf from external source at

GrA & GrB

Content of the

Glass bowl

Observed potential difference (p.d) at

GrC & GrD

Condition of the LED connected to

GrC & GrD

Current through the circuit
114.48 volts dcDistilled water2.48 voltsEmit moderate light7µA
2.40 volts             ,,5µA
2.45 volts             ,,7µA
214.40 volts dc0.0533% of NaCl solution3.04 voltsEmit appreciable light25µA
2.98 volts           ,,28µA
3.02 volts           ,,35µA


Experiment 2:  The above experiment is repeated by replacing the source of emf to 50 volts AC (actually about 53.6 volts AC,500mA) by using a step down transformer (Fig 2).


Observations: The observations are noted below in tabular form.

Sl No.Applied emf from external source at

GrA & GrB

Content of the

Glass bowl

Observed potential difference (p.d) at

GrC & GrD

Condition of the LED connected to

GrC & GrD

Current through the circuit
153.6 volts ACDistilled water6.9volts acEmits appreciable light65µA
7.5volts ac             ,,68µA
7.8volts ac             ,,68 µA
253.4 volts AC0.0533% of NaCl solution12.8volts acEmits bright light200µA
13.5 volts ac             ,,256µA
14.2 volts ac             ,,315µA



Next, to see the effect of electrical conduction in water below the decomposition potential of water, the following simple experiments are performed:

Experiment 3: A water battery is prepared by placing a graphite rod(GrW) and a zinc plate (Zn) in distilled water. The emf of this cell is noted. The water battery is then connected to a meter through two Graphite rods GrE & GrF dipped in distilled water contained in a glass bowl as shown in Fig 3.The potential difference between GrW & Gr E is noted.


Observations: The observations are noted in a tabular form

Sl. No.Emf of the water batteryPotential difference shown between GrW & GrE
             1882 mV618 mV
             21140 mV901 mV
             31141 mV900 mV


The potential difference of about 618mV to 900mV between GrW & GrE confirms the passage of electrical current through the distilled water between GrE & GrF even below the decomposition potential of water (i.e.1.23volts).


Experiment 4: A water battery is connected to two graphite rods Gr1(connected to GraphiteW) & Gr2( connected to Zinc). Another pair of graphite Gr3(connected to positive end of the meter) & Gr4(connected to negative end of the meter) is placed in 15 ml of distilled water contained in a bowl and its emf is measured as its initial emf. Now Gr1 & Gr 2 are placed in the same bowl such that Gr1 is in front of Gr3 while Gr2 in front of Gr4 and emf of Gr3 & Gr4 is again measured & noted as final emf (Fig4, condition 1) The experiment is repeated by reversing the order of placement of Gr1& Gr2( i.e. now,Gr2 is placed in front of Gr3 and Gr1 in front of Gr4) and final emf is noted again(Fig4, condition 2).


Observations: The observations are recorded in tabular form

Condition no.Condition typeemf of the water batteryemf of Gr3—Gr4

(initial emf)

emf of Gr3—Gr4

(final emf)

1Gr1 placed in front of Gr3 & Gr2 in front of Gr4988mV-35mV20mV55mV
2Gr2 placed in front of Gr3 & Gr1 in front of Gr4990mV-26mV-70mV-44mV


The varying difference in initial and final emf of Gr3 & Gr4 confirms the flow of electrical energy from Gr1 & Gr 2 to Gr3 & Gr4 through the distilled water. Therefore, it is rather clear that the final emf observed is certainly not the emf generated by Gr3& Gr4 itself but the potential difference due to conduction of electrical energy from Gr1 & Gr2 to the graphite pair Gr3 &Gr4.Here also electrical conduction through distilled water is found even below decomposition potential of water.



In experiment 1 & 2, the potential difference found at GrC & GrD that helps power the LED confirms the flow of electrical energy through the circuit. Though two graphite rods placed in distilled water show some emf acting like an energy source3 (in the range of (10 to 20mV), from the potential difference found in these experiments (about 2.40 volts dc and about 6 volts AC) it is evident that the LED uses the electrical energy applied at GrA & GrB from the external source. But it remains a question how such electrical energy is conveyed to the rods GrC & GrD connected to the LED both for the distilled water & the salt solution.

In experiment 3 & 4, it is found that conduction of electrical energy takes place through distilled water even below the decomposition potential of water (i.e. 1.23volts)

Now, according to the Arrhenius theory of electrolytic dissociation:

  • A portion of the electrolyte in solution is dissociated into positively charged and negatively charged particles. These charged particles are called ions, positively charged and negatively charged particles being cations and anions respectively. The electrical energy is conducted in water or an aqueous solution of salt through migration and subsequent neutralization of ions at the oppositely charged electrodes. Therefore, it is not clear
  1. Why and how ions approach the electrically neutral Graphite Rods GrC & GrD (in experiments 1& 2)?
  2. What makes ions approach Gr3 & Gr4 , in experiment 4, for both the conditions 1 &2 irrespective of the electrical nature of Gr3 & Gr4 (i.e. how do anions move to both Gr 4 & Gr3 by reversing the placement of Gr1 & Gr). In other words, if Gr4 acted as the anode to receive electrons from Gr2 in condition1, then how did the same graphite Gr4 act as cathode to release electrons in condition2?

Under a potential gradient, cations move toward the negative electrode or cathode and anions move toward the positive electrode or anode. When the cations reach the cathode, they get neutralized and neutral molecules are formed there. Similarly, when the anions reach the anode they get neutralized by giving up their negative charge and become neutral. This shows that electrolysis occurs only at the electrodes.


  1. As per existing theory, electrical conduction between GrA & GrB may be regarded as owing to the migration and neutralization of ions ,as ions have sufficient opportunity for migrating to the oppositely charged electrodes (cations towards cathode GrB and anions towards anode GrA) and getting neutralized by accepting or releasing electrons, but approach of any ions to the electrically neutral rods GrC & GrD and its subsequent neutralization by accepting or releasing electrons is quite astonishing. Thus, it is not clear how such rods GrC & GrD give up or accept electrons having no charge, i.e. in contradiction to Arrhenius theory wherein it is stated that electrolysis occurs only at the electrodes ( i.e. at the cathode and anode where negative and positive terminals of a battery are connected respectively) with neutralization of ions by acceptance of electrons by cations at cathode and release of electrons by anions at the anode.
  2. The current in the micro ampere range suggests that about 1012 electrons flow through the circuit per second and in doing so 1012 H+ ions are to be neutralized at GrD (behaving as cathode for lighting the LED) and 1012 OH ions are to be neutralized at GrC (behaving as anode for lighting the LED) i.e. 0.5×1012 molecules of hydrogen will be formed at electrically neutral rod GrD and 0.25×1012 molecules of oxygen will be formed at electrically neutral rod GrC. It means that ions can be neutralized and hydrogen gas and oxygen gas can be obtained even at electrically neutral graphite rods, other than actual cathode and anode where emf is applied from external source, in contradiction to the Arrhenius theory.
  3. Why and how Gr D, in experiments 1 &2, happen to be cathodes and supply electrons to the LED, i.e. how ions prefer electrically neutral graphite rods to make them behave as cathodes or anodes remains undecided.
  4. It appears that in experiment 3, for conduction of electrical energy between GrE and GrF, cations move to the cathode (GrF, negative electrode) and get neutralized there while anions get neutralized at anode (GrE, positive electrode).It further suggest that H2 and O2 are obtained at the cathode and anode respectively, i.e. electrolysis of water is possible even at any potential below its decomposition potential of 1.23volts!
  5. The electrolytic solution at any instant remains neutral even if the number of positively and negatively charged particles are unequal in the solution. This is due to the fact that the total positive charge carried by the cations is equal to the net negative charge carried by the anions.It is again not clear that when it is not possible for ions to approach and get neutralized at the electrically neutral graphite rods (as shown in experiments 1,2 &4) ,while conducting electrical current, how then the total positively charge carried by the cations is equal to the net negative charge carried by the anions.


About the author

Ruhul Amin & Biplab Chakraborty

Ruhul Amin & Biplab Chakraborty

Dr. Ruhul Amin MD is a Homeopathic physician & mental health professional, performing research work on homeopathy since 1998. The first work being on Diabetes Mellitus Type II and its homeopathic treatment, followed by Parkinsonism, Respiridone & Homeopathy and for the last eleven years concentrating strictly on the Homeopathic Dilution and its Scientific basis, along with chemist Biplab Chakraborty M Sc. Visit their


Biplab Chakraborty,M.Sc is a chemist from Calcutta University, previously a serious Critic of Homeopathic Dilution. . With this view he started research work along with Dr. Ruhul Amin for the last eleven years, finally being converted into a serious supporter of homeopathy. He along with Dr. Md.Ruhul Amin published papers on Homeopathic Dilution & its scientific Basis. These papers clearly reflect the contradiction within the modern science itself.

Leave a Comment