Scientific Research

Prevention and Treatment of Viral Infection: A Homeopathic Approach

Dr. Sneha Naambiar presents an introductory discussion about the advantages of homeopathy in treating viral diseases. Homeopathy’s success in treating Chikungunya fever is one of the items mentioned.

Originally published in Health Sciences 2012 – Journal of the Kerala University of Health Sciences.


In light of the current global healthcare concerns, this paper seeks to provide a commentary on the possible role of homeopathy in supporting the management of viral infections in the community. Targeted to a multidisciplinary readership, this paper provides an overview of the value of homeopathy in the prevention and treatment of viral infections. The basic tenets involved in the homeopathic treatment of viral infections are examined and some of the current evidences regarding the topic are appraised. While this paper is by no means exhaustive, it seeks to encourage and initiate the healthcare community at large towards adopting a favorable outlook towards the science of homeopathy, specifically with regard to its role in the management of viral infections.

In the past few decades, India has witnessed a marked increase in the incidence and prevalence of viral infections.1,2,3,4,5 Some of these infections have raised much concern because of their severity, extent of spread, and burden on health services.

Although conventional antiviral drugs have been developed for use as prophylactics and therapeutic agents, they have some disadvantages, such as adverse effects and the development of resistance.6 Furthermore, the large demand for these drugs during epidemics places a huge strain on national health resources.

In general, viral infections pose several problems to their treatment. These issues can be mainly attributed to certain properties of viruses themselves. Viruses are capable of developing alternative means of survival in the face of antibodies, immune cells, chemotherapeutic agents, or other hostile elements; their survival is achieved by mutations, recombination, and changes in biochemical pathways.7

Under these circumstances, there has been growing interest in the use of alternative therapies in the management of viral infections. Homeopathy has attracted considerable attention during the last few years, with a large number of patients receiving and seeking homeopathic treatment for both the management and prevention of diseases.

Homeopathy is a field of therapeutics based on the principle of “like cures like.” The symptoms of a patient are treated by administering a homeopathic medicine that is capable of producing similar symptoms in a healthy individual.

The medicines are prepared from plant, animal, and mineral substances by a process known as potentization, wherein the medicinal agent is subjected to serial dilutions in a carrier along with periodic agitation. The medicines are believed to enhance the immune response of the individual, enabling him/her to combat the disease and restore normal health.

For a homeopath, the most important aspect of approaching a case is thorough case taking; sometimes seemingly insignificant details may help the homeopath select the most suitable remedy. The choice of the remedy is mainly based on the symptom totality, which encompasses the physical and mental makeup of the patient.

Often, two patients at the same stage of a clinical condition, say upper respiratory tract infection, may receive different medicines because of differences in the symptoms that are peculiar and unrelated to the condition per se. Thus, the treatment administered is tailor-made for the patient, i.e., individualized.

Since the choice of the homeopathic remedy for a given case is based mainly on the clinical presentation, i.e., the signs and symptoms, the isolation of the physical “causative” agent, e.g., the bacterial or viral infectious agent is not mandatory for definitive treatment. Therefore, homoeopathic medicines can be employed even in cases of infection where the pathogenic organism cannot be readily identified or isolated.

This makes the system ideal for the treatment of new and emerging infectious diseases, which are currently a major public health concern. The management of such diseases may be improved by the combined use of homeopathy and effective public health measures. This combined approach needs to be tested in clinical trials to determine its practical value.

The fundamental principles of homeopathic prescription also make the system greatly valuable in epidemic settings. Since during an epidemic, the affected population essentially presents with a similar set of symptoms, the homeopathic remedy is selected by compiling these symptoms. The remedy selected on the basis of this profile is called the genus epidemicus, and it can be applied routinely in the treatment of most of the affected patients.

When appropriate, such a remedy can also serve as a prophylactic. A study conducted in Kerala revealed that homeopathic medicines were effective in preventing Chikungunya fever in an exposed population.8 Similarly, another recent report indicated that the homeopathic medicine Influenzinum plays an important role in the prevention and cure of influenza, while another drug, Oscilococcinnum, is useful for relieving the symptoms caused by this disease.9

Besides managing the acute infections, carefully selected homeopathic medicines are also capable of correcting the tendency for recurrent viral infections. The results of a large, prospective, multicenter cohort study examining the long-term benefits of homeopathic treatment in reducing disease severity and improving the patients’ quality of life have been encouraging.10

Further, studies conducted in some countries have shown that the homeopathic management of patients is cost-effective and patient friendly.11 This implies that given the opportunity, homeopathy can greatly reduce the burden on public health services; this would be particularly beneficial for a developing country like ours.

Homeopathy has been and is, to some extent, a frequent target of skepticism because of the supposed lack of sufficient evidence validating its fundamental tenets and clinical efficiency. In the past, studies on this system have been deemed to be of poor quality because of the conflicts between the basic theories of homeopathy and the standard principles of scientific research.

Nevertheless, recent publications reporting the results of several randomized controlled trials and studies on the value of homeopathy for various conditions have increasingly provided evidences in favor of homeopathy.12

An important oft-debated aspect of homeopathy is the mechanism of action of homeopathic medicines, which is often questioned because of the high dilutions at which the medicines are prepared. However, basic science studies have shown that very high dilutions of substance do, in fact, retain the properties of the original substance13 and that such dilutions have certain biological effects on cells.14 Further investigations on these lines are expected to conclusively establish the effectiveness of homeopathic medicines at a physiological level.

All in all, homeopathy has great potential as a therapeutic system that stands at par with conventional medicine. With evidence to the effectiveness of homeopathy mounting, this stream of therapeutics can be expected to gain widespread acceptance both nationally and internationally and establish its supremacy, at least in certain therapeutic areas.


  1. Chadha MS et al. Multi-site virological influenza surveillance in India: 2004–2008. Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00293.x. [Epub ahead of print]
  2. Chadha MS et al. Nipah virus-associated encephalitis outbreak, Siliguri, India. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006. 12;235-40.
  3. Paramasivan R, et al. West Nile virus: the Indian scenario. Indian J Med Res. 2003. 118;101-08.
  4. Karmarkar SA, et al. A study of acute febrile encephalopathy with special reference to viral etiology. Indian J Pediatr. 2008. 75;801-05.
  5. Chowdhary J et al. Measles with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). Indian Pediatr. 2009. 46;72-74.
  6. Moscona A. Global transmission of oseltamivir-resistant influenza. N Engl J Med 2009. 360;953-956.
  7. Evans AS Kaslow RA (ed.) Epidemiologic concepts and Methods. In: Viral infections of humans: epidemiology and control, Volume 813. 4th Plenum Medical Book Co., New York. 1997. pp 9.
  8. Rejikumar R et al. Chikungunya Fever Epidemic 2006-Study report: A Study on the Prophylactic Efficacy of Homoeopathic Preventive Medicine Against Chikungunya Fever [accessed on 25-03-12]; Available from:
  9. Oliveira ALM et al. The biotherapics Influenzinum and Oscilococcinum in the treatment of influenza virus flu: a literature review. Int J High Dilution Res [online] 2011 [accessed 25th March 2012]; 10(35): 94-94. Proceedings of the XXIV GIRI Symposium; 2010 Nov 05; Monte Carlo (Monaco). GIRI; 2010. Available from:
  10. Witt CM et al. How healthy are chronically ill patients after eight years of homeopathic treatment?–Results from a long term observational study. BMC Public Health. 8;413.
  11. Trichard M et al. Pharmacoeconomic comparison between homeopathic and antibiotic treatment strategies in recurrent acute rhinopharyngitis in children. 2005. 94(1);3-9.
  12. Jonas WB et al. A critical overview of homeopathy. Ann Int Med. 2003. 138(5):393-399.
  13. Chikramane PS et al. Extreme homeopathic dilutions retain starting materials: A nanoparticulate perspective. 2010. 99(4);231-42.
  14. Magnani P et al. Dose-effect study of Gelsemium sempervirens in high dilutions on anxiety-related responses in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 210(4);533-45.

About the author

Sneha Naambiar

Dr. Sneha Nambiar BHMS, ELS graduated from the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences in 2005. After a few years in clinical practice, she ventured into the field of biomedical writing and editing and now has more than a decade of experience in the field, while continuing to practice on a small scale.

Leave a Comment