Clinical Cases

A Child’s Case of Space Occupying Lesion in Brain

A case of brain lesion solved with the case witnessing process.

The sole objective of a physician while receiving the case of a child is to understand his individualistic expressions at the holistic level. As described in my article about child centric case witnessing, to understand children at the holistic level, there are five components that are important and helpful:

  1. Child’s centre obtained through case witnessing process

  2. Physician’s observations about the child

  3. Physician’s examination findings of the child (especially in children of young age who cannot express)

  4. Mother’s history during pregnancy

  5. Parents’ observations about the child

The individualistic expression which comes up in all the five areas or at least in more than two areas surely helps us to find the similimum for a child, as per the unique individuality of the child.

Through the following case of Miss M. S., I will illustrate the importance and use of the above mentioned components for child-centric case witnessing.

Preliminary Details:

Miss M. S., 8 year old female came to me with her mother in November 2010. As per the mother’s history about the chief complaint of the child, the child was detected with a solitary granuloma in the right parasagittal frontal cortex which according to the MRI could be granulo nodular cysticercosis or alternatively old tuberculoma. The child was also very hyperactive.

History of chief complaint:

In august 2010, the child fell in school. Post injury she had numbness in the left leg. She was limping for around 20 days and the numbness went on increasing. Hence an MRI was done (Copy of the scanned report is below). For 15 days the child was on steroids and was better, after which the limping and numbness started again. For 2 months the child was on same modern medicine treatment. Limping and numbness was better, however the lesion detected on MRI was the same. After-effects of steroids like weight gain, irritation, and hyperactivity was also noticed in the child, by the mother

Investigation report MRI: 

When the child was brought to me, at that time I understood her completely through the case witnessing process.

(NOTE: The case has been edited for brevity. Peculiar sentences are highlighted in italics and/or bold. My explanations and thought process during the case are in plain brackets ( ) and in green. D, P stands for Doctor and Patient respectively. Follow ups have been summarized at the end of the case.)


D: Tell me a little bit about you.

P: (Pause for 3 – 4 minutes)

I like to play. Can I call my mother in?

D: Tell me about you. I will call your mother later

P: (Pause)

(Area: playing games)

I like to play…badminton…we have a…in the building…we have a ground…big ground. We play there. We play hide and seek…And then there is an intercom. I’ve one, small sister…cousin. She also plays with us. I’ve many friends in my building. We all come and play but some more times my friend’s mother calling 1-2mins…that’s why we have to go home and we watch TV and we do other some other…other…in computer also there are many games, then we play. My cousin sister’s father has a laptop. There is a cake game so we play that. And we have a TV, there are some little games in that, we play and just again….in all the rooms the intercom is connected, all the friends go home, change their clothes and we go to sleep.

(I did not understand the context of what the patient was saying. However in the passive process, we passively listen to whatever the patient says.)

D: What else?

P: (Area: school)

When we go to the school, our teacher always tells us that complete the books and give us. We always do and give her. In 2nd standard, miss always gave us star, when we complete our books. Then in 1 hour she gave us and but we cannot…not all children can complete the book but from one and the other we complete the book and give to the teacher. Then there were 4 miss (teachers). 1st miss left because in the school she had 1 problem. The other miss also left. Our Hindi miss…P. miss, came to our class then. She also went from our class. She wants to join in our school, another class that’s why she went. One other miss came…S. miss…she teaches us and she also went from school. She told that I’ll just handle these children 2 weeks, and then I’ll also go. Then our principal…principal told all our class that our miss is going. Then we come at home, told our parents also but next time parents came to the school and asked that why you’re changing one and the other teachers; they told we are not changing, they are going from the school. Then we told, no…the miss is here, they’re changing the classes. Then next time, they didn’t change. But sometime they change. Now I’m in 3rd std. The principal is changing the teacher now.

(The child starts talking about her school. She begins with completing books in school, to the number of teachers in the school and then how the teachers are changing class etc., etc. In this area she does not give any significant details about her own self. Hence I ask her, “What else about you?” I am yet passive as I am not directing her to any particular area, however I am subtly telling her to talk about herself. I also note that the child’s voice is hoarse throughout while conversing with me.).

D: What else about you?

P: (Area: building where the patient resides)

I like to play in my building only. In other building… we play, the watchman always shouts and the building people also shout, that’s why we play only in our building. But sometimes…in our building there are mango trees, they’re always there. But children come and pluck the mangoes… then other…then the meeting was there in our building, then we all children went to the manager and told, that in our building there were three mango trees, in all the trees there are many mangoes. But the children are coming and plucking them, please tell them…tell them otherwise tell the watchman to take care of the mangoes.

(Area changes from building to playing to mangoes to watchman to …..In short span of time patient changes many areas)

Then the manager tells to the watchman, but watchman are only plucking the mangoes and taking it to their home. Always night…the morning duty watchman takes some mangoes and gives it to our building; he was very good. The night duty one, he used to take all 3 mangoes, 3 mango trees, there was there. One mango tree, morning watching didn’t pluck it, because they are green. Then the night duty one take the…all the mangoes from trees and we didn’t get. We found everywhere, then in our building only watchman sit and watchman room back it is…then the manager went there and saw that one full box…night duty watchman has taken…The manager shout at him very much but again he…now didn’t do and the manager told that don’t come to our building.

(The child still continuous to talk a lot, changes from one topic to another topic and the talk does not give any significant detail about her. However I remain passive and listen to the child.)

D: What else do you do?

P: (Area: playing)

We just play down sometime…we go at the…there is one garden just down they’ve made it, we go there. It is a nice garden. We play there. There is a…one park…in that only park we…they can do jogging, yoga and all that is there. We children play there, our parents take a round there…

D: Ok, very good. Tell something more about you…

P: (Area garden)

Last time, we went there in the new garden, we saw it, it was very good, but there were many flies and all that. We sat together. We had lunch box. We went at 6’o clock and we came at 7’o clock but our parents didn’t allow it. I told my grandmother…my grandmother told my mother that we can go there and play. There is one…in that only garden…green place is there…green grass…we sit together. We play there also. We take a round, there it is very big… but some other time we went to the mall with friends because a party was there…We went but…they didn’t allow us, then we called my sister that they are not allowing us to go in the mall. Then she came and take us to the…because they…because the… we that birthday card…we forgot at our house. We had to take that.

D: Ok…

P: Then my sister told that you had brought the birthday card. Then I told no, we forgot that. Then she said no problem. I’ve many cards you take that and give to watchman, they’ll allow us. Then we went. The party was very nice. There were many games like…it was very…we played hide and seek. They tell us that bring one rupee coin from the bags – parents…we did that also…but it was not…it was not nice because that we again went home and watch TV and go to sleep.


Now, the watchman that our manager has kept, they are very nice. They take care of mango trees, they take care of us, when we fell down they called our mother, father that they have slipped off the garden. They help us to go to our home also. My sister doesn’t know how to… we are staying in 14number floor…the…my sister doesn’t know how to press the number 14. The…she tells the watchman…that please can you do it? The watchman do and call in our home that my sister is coming, we take her from the lift, otherwise she cries.

(The child wanders in various areas, changes from one subject to another, talks about random things, and does not provide any significant detail about herself. Does anything make sense to you while you are reading this case? I am sure even you are trying to make sense about what is happening. I had the same experience at my end when I understood this child.)

D: What else about you?

P: (Area: fear of dogs)

I’m scared of dogs because in our building the outside dog has team…that’s why we are scared…Now-a-days we don’t play hide and seek, badminton and all that. We go to the backside garden in our building; the dog comes with us there also. In our building first there were 2 dogs, 3 dogs…1 tail was cut…the…in our second floor there is V. aunty…whenever something is happened bad like the bird is…bird’s feather is cut, she helps us. That’s why she has a dog at her home. The dog’s name is Max. He plays football with all the boys and when our cock is fall down, he helps us…to give us but we all children don’t touch it because it is something…something happened to dog that’s why…2 dogs are white and 1 dog is brown. It’s in our ground…1 dog…1 white one was dead because something happened. One dog is there but one dog died then the other outside dogs come to our building; that’s why we didn’t come out of our homes also, because we were scared. When we run, the dogs come to us, that is why we didn’t go down. We didn’t play anything. We just talk with each other and go home.

(I thought this time, since the patient started to talk about her fear, the patient will give some more significant details about her individuality. However, the same happens. The patient starts with fear of dogs and then goes into playing games and then dogs come in their building, then the neighbor has a dog, and then ……..

The child’s talk goes on and on and on, her topics keep changing, however there is nothing really significant that I could gather from her talks. There are no expressions coming up where I can understand anything unique about her individuality, neither am I able to obtain a significant focus.)



Except for loquacity, changing topics randomly, talking about insignificant things, there is no other expression coming up in any area that she talks about. This is the time when there is a need to become passively active and take the child to other subconscious areas like fears or dreams.


In every area I observe that the child is:

  • Loquacious

  • Talking incessantly

  • Changing from subject to subject

  • Talking about insignificant details

  • Has hoarse voice

Except for that there is nothing peculiar or out of place


The above mentioned out of place, out of order come up in each and every area however as a physician I was not sure if this is the focus, while I was taking the case. However, if the same continues even in sub conscious areas, in the mother’s history about the child, then it is definitely the focus of the child.


Child talks about common situations, common emotions and day to day occurrence…

Emotion level

How patient is experiencing the level of experience:

Patient is in touch with her self

At which level patient is experiencing the level of experience:

General level

Child gives common situational details in every area that she talks about.



However, since we do not have a confirmed focus, we do not fix the potency here.


Since the focus has not yet emerged in the case, first we become active to find the focus. Then we confirm the focus. Once the focus is confirmed we proceed with the active-active part and explore other areas, like the mother’s observations about the child, mother’s history during pregnancy, examination etc., etc.



D: Ok… tell me what are you scared of?

P: I’m scared of dogs only.

D: Only dogs? What else you are scared of?

P: Nothing else. I’m just scared of…when we went to the zoo… I was scared of lion, tiger and other all animals. I like only elephant, horse, and camel. My brother also has a dog. He doesn’t bite anyone. But, when I came to my brother’s house, when he sat in bed…we…something broke…then I got up and saw…then my brother told this dog has taken out all the cloth of the bed. That’s why…I’m scared of only dogs. But in my brother’s house the dog is very nice. He does not bite me…he has not done anything wrong in the house…my brother’s house. The dog also plays with us in garden.

(The child begins with the fear of dogs, but as we go to explore it deeper, she changes her area from the zoo, to her brother has a dog, to being scared of dogs, then her brother’s dog plays with her in the garden. She does not give any emotions or delusion or experience about her fear of dogs as we see in other children’s cases. Children usually describe the fear or what they are scared of or why they are scared of certain things, or the experience of the fear. But here we see that the child starts with the fear, but then ends up talking about random areas. The loquacity, change of topics from one to another, incessant talking etc., etc. comes up in the area of fears too.

I still try to explore the fears by changing the question. Also, I note that her voice is still hoarse.).

D: What fears did you have as a baby?

P: When I fell down, I used to have jerks in my legs. When my shoes got out of the leg because of jerks…when I walked I fell down like this…And then my teacher was not there…then my teacher came…she took me…my friend then called S. miss (teacher), then they all took me to the nurse…they called my mother, they gave me some juice or anything like…then I was admitted… My father…come to my bus stop, he took me home. I removed my clothes, sat, then my father told, show me your finger movement…I told I can’t do…I can’t do…then he called my mother…again I was admitted. Then MRI was done…. I am very scared of MRI

(Here I explore the fear of MRI, however the child kept talking, kept changing topics and did not give significant details about her fear.)

D: Anything else?

P: No.

(As a physician we expect the child to talk about her fears and describe them in detail. However that is not happening with this child. But, so far, what is peculiar about this child is that in any area the child goes, she does the same thing. She changes the topic of her talk now and then. This is the individuality of this child. As a homoeopath, my only aim is to alertly understand her unique individuality and refrain from analysing or interpreting it… hence I continue to do so.

We can dig out details mechanically from the child by asking about the fear, dream, behaviour, nature, thirst, craving, aversion etc., etc. Nevertheless by doing so, we would only miss the centre of the child that the child is invariably giving us in every area that she goes into.

I go into another subconscious area of dreams to explore and see what happens there.)



D: Then tell me what dreams you get?

P: (Pause)

Sometimes, sometimes…I get that…I’m now ok…I can walk without the medicines and all that but I’m still on the medicine. Sometimes I see ghost in dreams… In the hospital…the…always the injection and all that we get, they have made a butterfly on my hand…that’s why I’m very scared of butterfly only. Because that…when they put something in…I cried…

(Patient begins talking about the dream and then again changes topic from dream to hospital, to fear of injection, to butterfly. I bring her back to the dream area.)

D: Just recollect what dreams you get…

(Patient took big long pause of 20 minutes, eyes looking Up at One point)

(Pause and the activity in the pause give us a clue about the patient. Here the patient takes a long pause and her eyes are looking at one point. This gives us a clue that the patient is rewinding back and going deeper. This gives surety that the patient is on the right track and is connecting with her centre. At this point we do not interrupt the pause.)

D: What do you see?

P: One time we had gone to Lonavala (a hill station in Mumbai), I saw a black snake and green snake there…

D: You saw black snake and green snake?

P: In the evening, but when I went to sleep…the dream came…the dream came that I saw the black snake and green snake… I always tell my mother that I cannot touch the snakes and anything…my sister just touches the snakes…I cannot

(Here she uses animated gestures to describe what she said. There is a change in the monotonous body language of the patient. While explaining the dream about snakes and about her reaction to snakes and her sister’s reaction to snakes, the child gets involved verbally and non-verbally with the whole description. This is a clue that the patient is touching her centre as the conscious and subconscious, the verbal and non-verbal is getting aligned.)

P: My small sister picks up the snake and throws it.

D: Oh! She does that?

P: She always does that.

D: So what dreams of snakes do you get?

P: (Pause)

That I’m touching the snake and then I get up and cried.

D: Oh!!!

P: I don’t…My sister only loves snakes.

D: She loves snakes? What about snakes does she love?

P: Snakes…she loves…she tells me that… when I see the snakes I like to take them to our house…I told, “No…I’ll get out of my house”.

D: You said that?

P: I’m very scared of snakes. Black snake.

(Hand Gesture: Fingers entangled)

D: Black? What kind of black?

P: Some snakes are poisonous and some are not. I don’t like the poisonous and other ones also.

(Hand Gesture: Fingers entangled)

D: What kind of poisonous snake, don’t you like?

P: Because when they prick us…(Shows pricking with her finger)We are…we’re dead.

D: What kind of bite do they do? What do they do when they bite?

P: They just…take out the tongue and prick us (takes her tongue out)

D: And then what happens?

P: The…it is not poisonous…we are not dead. If it is poisonous then we’re dead.

D: What happens with the poison?

P: Poison, when it goes in our body, then we’ll be dead.

D: What happens when poison goes inside the body?

P: Please don’t talk about it, I’m scared

(Here the child throws a subtle defence which gives us a clue that the child is touching her centre and hence her conscious self is throwing up a defence.)

D: You are scared. What happens when it is gone inside?

P: No, when I listen to all this, then when I sleep, then the dream will come…

D: You get dreams?

P: Yes, my sister, when she talks about snakes and then she purposely does it we’re sleeping, she does like this…

(Gesture of holding eyebrow)

(The change in the body language, the strong fear coming up in the area of snakes gives us a clue that the patient has touched her centre.

Till now we have obtained the following as focus of the child:

  • Loquacity

  • Changes topic

  • Talks about unimportant matters

  • Fear of snakes

  • Change in body language when talking about snakes

  • Hoarse voice

Now we go ahead to confirm the focus of the child. Earlier the child also commented about dreams of ghosts. We use this area to confirm the focus of the child.)


D: What about that ghost dream which comes, what happens in that?

P: (Pause)

Hmmm…I don’t know like this thing. But I know that…what can happen that…the…the bad people…I didn’t talk with bad people. One day, an uncle, came to our building, he gave chocolates to us…all the children… …we went to my uncle…and tell this is that…Oh! What it is…What is the date that this chocolate has made…it’s not that poisonous one right?

(Strange! I ask her to talk about her dreams of ghosts, but she again wanders in other areas and there strangely, she says chocolate given by an uncle may contain poison!!! Earlier also she had mentioned being scared of poisonous snakes! This spontaneous connection that she makes in her talk gives us a surety that we are on the right track. This confirms that poisonous is also part of the centre.)

D: It’s poisonous?

P: It was not poisonous…but it was…

D: So you don’t like bad people?

P: No, I don’t like bad people. They push us…they don’t tell sorry to us…They tell bad things and all…They beat us

D: What else do bad people do?

P: I don’t know.

D: According to you?

P: In our building, one time the watchman was bad, he gave us bad…bad…bad, bad language to us that only.

(Here the patient connects the watchman and the bad things that watchman do from the passive. Patient is sensitive to bad things, pushing, beating, and also bad language. All this is also part of her centre.

This case taught me that the peculiar individuality of the child may not necessarily come up through the sensation or delusion of the child. It can come up in the form of a repeated pattern that is expressed in each and every area that a patient talks about.

Here I end my conversation with the child; below is the summarised version of the history obtained till now…)

  1. Child’s centre obtained through Case Witnessing Process:

  • Loquacity

  • Talk – changes topic from one to another

  • Fear of dog

  • Fear of snakes, poisonous snake

  • Dreams of green and black snakes

  • Sensitive to bad people, bad things like people pushing, beating, bad language

  1. Physician’s observations about the child:

  • Talks about unimportant matter

  • Hoarseness of voice

  • Talks in a monotonous voice and manner

  • Change in body language when talking about fear of snakes

  • Alignment of verbal and non verbal hand gestures when talking about fear of snakes

(Now, I call her mother into the consulting room to get more details about the child, to get the pregnancy history and to know the observations made by her of the child.).

Mother’s history during pregnancy (MHDP):

I asked the mother to describe all the changes that the mother went through during her pregnancy, at physical level, mental level, general level, emotional level and subconscious level. The history of the mother during the pregnancy obtained at the holistic level, is actually the energy of the child expressed through the mother. The PQRS obtained through MHDP:

  • Craving curd

  • Aversion to fruits

  • Active in the night

  • Aversion to reading books which she otherwise liked a lot

  • Lots of dreams of snakes, dark green snake and black snake (the child also has such dreams)

Mother’s observations about the child:

  • Talks nonsense things especially when I make the child study. She talks out of context things and all nonsense things continuously. (This is very evident even in the PQRS obtained through CWP)

  • She beats, teases and pinches other people and after that she laughs a lot (In the CWP we saw that the child is herself sensitive to all this and here we see that the child also does the same things. This depicts animal quality)

  • She is more active in the night, she is a night creature. (This change has been observed in MHDP also.)

  • Now she’s purely a tomboy.

  • When the mother is talking about the child, the child pinches the mother. (Subtle defense thrown by the child)

  • She is very witty especially at teasing others.

  • She mimics everybody around her.

  • She had her milestones like teething, walking pretty fast as compared to other children. (Precocious child)

  • She is very mischievous.

  • She is very jealous about her sister. She always compares her things with her sister.

  • She never plays with children of her age because of this comparison thing. She will either play with bigger or with smaller children

Here I ended the case interview.

Understanding of the case:

Centre of the child obtained in all the 4 areas (CWP, My observation of child, MHDP and Mother’s observation of child) :

  • Loquacity

  • Loquacity with hoarseness of voice

  • Loquacity – changes topic from one to another

  • Loquacity – talks about unimportant matter

  • Ill effects of injury

  • Dreams of snake

  • Fear of animals – dog, snake

  • Mischievous – pushes, pinches, beats, mimics

  • Jealousy

  • Active in the night

  • Witty

  • Precocity in children

  • Aversion to reading

  • Aversion to fruits

  • Craving milk, ice-cream

Differential remedies:

There are many drugs that have loquacity in the centre like Mephitis (loquacity with excitement as if drunk), Paris Quadrifolia (garrulous loquacity, loquacious mania, talking about trivial common things), Teucrium Marum Varum (mental excitement with loquacity, changing from subject to subject with excitement), Stramonium (fright in centre with loquacity…), Taraxacum – injury in centre with loquacity) etc., etc.

However the centre of our patient matches Lachesis in all terms; her animated talk, her change in body gestures while describing snakes, her other PQRS of jealousy, comparing, wittiness, active in night, etc. that I get in common from child’s history, observations by the physician, Parent’s observations and also the mother’s history during pregnancy. Also, when I put all the PQRS in the Complete Repertory, Lachesis comes as first choice of options:


MIND – LOQUACITY – changing quickly from one subject to another



MIND – LOQUACITY – children; in



MIND – LOQUACITY – hoarseness; only kept in check by



MIND – LOQUACITY – nonsense






MIND – FEAR – snakes, of






MIND – JEALOUSY – children – in



MIND – PRECOCITY of children



MIND – READING – aversion to read



GENERALS – FOOD and DRINKS – milk – desire








































































In terms of theme (loquacity joined with snake group of remedies) in area of child’s conversation, mother’s history during pregnancy and also through reportorization, I came to the same remedy, I decide to give her Lachesis.


POTENCY: 200 (patient was at emotion level of experience in passive process)

The patient was advised to stop the steroids in order to bring out the orignial unmodified picture of the lesion.


After 21 days:

  • 10% amelioration in hyperactivity and sleep is better
  • No visible difference in the behaviour otherwise
  • Mother said that the lesion has reduced in size.

Management: One dose repeated as the remedy is on right track so far.

After 3 months of starting treatment:

  • Got skin rash in groins (exteriorization)

  • Mischievousness reduced

  • Hyperactivity reduced a lot

  • Pinching, teasing others, beating reduced a lot

  • Oedema around the lesion reduced with reduction in size of the lesion

  • As per the neurologist, the lesion was now from 100% liquid converted into 50% liquid and 50% solid (calcified)

  • Anti-convulsant only SOS dosage

  • Refer MRI After treatment (first)

Management: one dose was repeated every month;

The child was doing well in terms of behavior, size of lesion, calcification process had started…hence the surety of the remedy was built further. Thus I continued repeating the medicine in same way.

After 6 months of starting treatment:

  • Patient overall improving at physical and behavioral level

  • Dependency on medicines reduced

  • Investigation suggests improvement

  • Brain lesion calcified on MRI

  • Weakness, jerks in the leg completely better

  • Overall hyperactivity reduced by almost 95%

  • Pinching, beating, teasing only occasional

  • Hair better

  • Sleep better

  • Appetite better

  • Loquacity reduced a lot

  • Jealousy and sibling rivalry was much under control

  • All medicines stopped, only anti-convulsant to be taken SOS as per neurologist, however it was not required.

  • Weight gained due to steroids reduced

  • No after effects on stopping steroids and other medication.

  • Refer to MRI After treatment (second).

The lesion calcified completely on MRI. This itself was indicative of the healing process. Further completion of the healing of the remaining calcified tissue will take place through the natural healing mechanism and regularized dosage of our medicines.

Management: takes one dose every 2 months when required.

Case Ends.


About the author

Dinesh Chauhan

Dr. Dinesh Chauhan practices Classical homoeopathy in Mumbai, India. Case Witnessing Process is a scientific and human-centric case taking approach developed by him over a decade of research and seeing patient after patient at Swasthya Homeopathic Healing. Distinguished as a lecturer in many countries, he has the ability to captivate listener’s attention as he masterfully makes homoeopathic theory come to life. He heads the non-profit ABJF foundation with his wife Dr. Urvi Chauhan where Indian Homoeopaths are taught free. He is the author of three books A Journey into the Human Core; A Wander with a Little Wonder - Child centric Case witnessing, and The Scientifically Intuitive Case Witnessing Process – A Journey of Three Steps. Website:, Email: [email protected], [email protected]


    • thank you roger for your kind words. i used mac rep and Ref work but my staff must have put that on word file and then type it again.
      Deep regards from germany, i am here for my seminar.

  • In very many cases of solitary ring enhancing lesions appearing like neurocysticercosis on MRI, treatment with steroids with or without albendazole/praziquantel for a period of few weeks would give follow up MRI reports similar to this case.

    Personally I would find it difficult to comment on extent of benefit given by the homeopathic treatment in such cases who have already received conventional treatment.

    Case analysis is interesting though.

  • dear dr Amit, thank you for your kind words and nice to know your depth understanding of prognosis of obituary ring enhancing lesson appearing line NCC AND AGREE WITH YOU WHAT YOU ARE SAYING. patient did three MRI every month with no change in the lesson and thats where homeopathy started. changes at mental, emotional and holistic level at the same time where pathology started regressing.

    Regards and keep doing great work of spreading scientifically intuitive homeopathy. keep giving and sharing your depth with journal like this, people will be benefit from your depth.

  • it was a very long case,explained in detail.its is simple case superficially upto loqacity,fear of snake,mischeiousness.after 3 months nerological changes r excellant with lachesis only,this is appriciable.

Leave a Comment