Homeopathy Papers

The Mosaic of Auto-Immune Disorders in the Eyes of a Homeopath

Ajit Kulkarni
Written by Ajit Kulkarni

Dr. Ajit Kulkarni discusses auto immune disorders from the perspective of homeopathy. Case examples are included.

“Nothing can bring you peace, but yourself.”

–  Ralph Waldo Emerson


  • Introduction
  • Identification
  • Against the host
  • Characters of autoimmune diseases
  • Psychological Profile and autoimmunity
  • List of autoimmune diseases
  • Miasmatic assessment
  • Repertorial perspective
  • Clinical cases
  • Conclusion

Immunology concerns with multifaceted aspects that revolve around the clinical challenges of the defense of the host, several mechanisms involved in the fight for survival, tumor immunology, allergic reactions, transplantations and auto-immunity.

Golub and Green (1991) defined immunology as the “science of self/non-self discrimination”. This definition, although small, focuses on how important is the concept of self. In addition to defensive and restorative processes, the immune system engages itself in information processing and cognition, active interaction with the environment for maintaining the equilibrium and for symbiotic relationship, so essential for living in this prodigious universe. This gives rise to two orientations: 1. The biological system concerning the insularity of the organism and immunity for the sake of protection. 2. The ecological context concerning the organism’s dynamic entity while interacting with the environment at large.

In short, the field of immunology is related to organism as a whole, biological identity, individuality of the organism and several physiological processes utilized in a continual effort to maintain the homeostasis on the face of variable situations.


Every ‘self’ has its identity. Every self needs security. The self has to be protected by all means possible, given the biological structure and self will negotiate with every cell to participate. Immunity is not just protection. It extends well beyond the protective motif to include mediation of exchange processes with the environment. The immune identity has to be a ‘fluid’ state to accomplish coping up with internal and external stimuli that continuously harp upon the system as a process of dynamic interaction.

Identification is the process of identifying the self. Roles are crucial to identification. Each organism has its own identity but the roles define the quality of identity. Roles change under the dimensions of time and space. With the changing roles, coping up brings on the level of a different challenge. Thus the challenge is accepted and dealt with and the theme of symbiosis is thoroughly followed; for, without symbiosis, the organism has no ‘quality identity’.

The self is an autonomous entity. It is a complex consortium and has a well-equipped supply of sophisticated mechanisms. Through the host of physiological processes, with innumerable functions, the immune system establishes and maintains the organismal identity. This is an on-going process from birth until death.  There is a in-built surveillance system that monitors and recognizes the harmful agent. In order to deal with the harmful agent, the immune activities are arrayed and various kinds of reactions are produced. The spectrum of these reactivities determines the character of immunity. If the immunity brings on to the fore many of the reactivities, then these reactivities must also be balanced. The whole issue concerns the autonomous individuality and the organismal collectivity that work in an integrated manner to maintain the homeostasis.


The immunity designates antibodies as antitoxins. The antigen is designated as an invading agent, of a pathogen, or an allergen; in other words, of a harmful substance or stimulus. Autoimmunity is the misdirected immune response to the host. There is a deranged identification of an innocuous substance as immunogenic.  Autoimmunity refers to a breakdown in the immune system’s ability to maintain self-tolerance, resulting in an immune response directed against self-components of the body.  Autoimmunity attacks not only the body but immune defenses themselves and redirects the system to the future ‘to-come.’

Autoimmune diseases are characterized by chronic inflammation in which the rate of tissue damage exceeds the body’s ability to repair the damage. It is generally accepted that the cause of any given auto immune disease is multifactorial and that environmental and genetic factors play a role in susceptibility (Tizard, 1995).

ADs are generally divided into two types: organ-specific, where the immune response is directed toward a target antigen that is specific to a single organ or gland and systemic, which involves a response directed across a broad array of organs and tissues.

  • Recognition problem

In order for the immune system to protect the body against attack by foreign organisms, it must be able to distinguish between the body’s own proteins (autoantigens) and proteins from foreign cells (foreign antigens). When the immune system turns against autoantigens, thus attacking its own tissues, the resulting condition is an autoimmune disease. Let us take an example of the army. There is the central administration and rules and regulations and every soldier follows the discipline and works in symbiosis. But some soldiers start taking the antagonistic stand and turn against the system; it’s like a coup.

  • Surveillance problem

Immune surveillance is a theory that the immune system patrols the body not only to recognize and destroy invading pathogens but also host cells that become cancerous. Perhaps potential cancer cells arise frequently throughout life, but the immune system usually destroys them as fast as they appear. There is some evidence for this attractive notion. There is also evidence that the immune system mounts an attack against established cancers although it often fails.

The intelligent immune system carefully watches every happening in its laboratory. This monitoring of the behavior of each cell in the body is the basis for homeostasis, a disposition of living beings to keep on functioning at an optimum level, despite changes in the environment within certain limits. Remember, homeostasis employs feedback mechanisms to maintain the dynamic equilibrium of a self-regulating system.

  • Immune surveillance in Central Nervous System

CNS is continuously monitored by resident microglia and blood borne immune cells (macrophages, dendritic cells and T cells) to detect damaging agents that would disrupt homeostasis and optimal functioning of these vital organs.

  • Immune surveillance by the Liver

The liver contains numerous, innate and adaptive immune cells that specialize in detection and capture of pathogens from the blood. Further, these immune cells participate in coordinated immune responses leading to pathogen clearance, leucocyte recruitment and antigen presentation to lymphocyte within the vasculature.

  • Internalization

If we look at the type of inflammation that goes deep and causes damage of tissues of vital organs, internalization becomes an important character of ADs. There is nothing like superficial pathology either in acute or in chronic. In autoimmune inflammations, the onset of symptoms is caused by the reaction of the immune system. But because the reaction is directed against the self, it becomes an internalized process of destruction. In autoimmune inflammations, there is a hindrance to the free expansive use of the immune system resulting in restriction of its ability to eliminate wastes and toxins, which are then retained and provoke irritation/inflammation in the physical body.

  • Destructive

The failure of the surveillance mechanism and consequent development of the aberrant immune response leads to the process of destruction, unless aided by the treatment modality based on the law of similars.

  • Suicidal

The immune system becomes helpless and as if paralyzed and cannot cope up with the continuation of the aberrant immune response. The system takes on the path of self-harm.


Painful: Most of ADs cause pain at both physical and mental level.

Terrifying: The situation becomes often terrifying during the course of AD.

Strange behavior: Yes, acting against the self, going from harmony to disharmony is a strange behavior.

As if paralyzed and helpless: The system becomes a mute spectator of AD process if it goes relentless and unabated.

Self-sacrificing: Whether it is the sacrifice of the system and sacrifice for whom?

Non-acceptance: I don’t accept the harmony, so much of symbiosis.

Antagonism with self: Does the system becomes hatred, bitter, antipathic and aggressive and wants to punish itself?

Battling against self: The battel begins for survival, for winning and in the battle there are ups and downs, exacerbations and remissions. There can be a loss of function or of structure of single or multiple organs.


It is well known that the psychological distress leads to deleterious effects on immune and neuroendocrine functioning. The research suggests that personality, psychological, and/or social supports factors are the stronger determinants of response to illness. Psychological distress represents patient’s interpretations of stress and their perceived impact can be considered an intermediate measure in the relationship between stress and illness.  Psychological distress can impact health both indirectly, through health behaviors (e.g., compliance to medical regimens, poorer sleep, poor nutrition) or directly through alterations in the central and autonomic nervous, immune, endocrine, and cardiovascular systems.

In most patients with autoimmune illness, it is found that there was significant stress in childhood and, more importantly, an inability to adequately act out, express and externalize the stress, in other words, inadequate catharsis of the feeling. Hindrance in externalization à internalizationà telling upon the economy.  It is necessary, hence, is to elicit the thorough history of the patient to know the life experiences and how they have affected the person as a whole. The personality itself is sickness. The search of the homeopathic physician should be to define what lead to the development of autoimmunity. Explore the inter-personal relationship of the patients. Some research findings have been offered here in connection with ADs. Remember, homeopathy has already recognized the importance of relation between mind and body and the role of mind in ADs.

  • Elevated levels of psychological distress have also been reported in scleroderma and Sjögren’s syndrome patients. Valtysdottir, Gudbjornsson, Lindqvist, Hallgren, and Hetta (2000) examined levels of anxiety, depression, well-being, and symptoms in 62 Sjögren’s patients compared with a group of healthy controls and a group of patient controls with RA. The results indicated significantly higher levels of anxiety and depression, and reduced physical and mental well-being in Sjögren’s patients compared with healthy controls. The Sjögren’s patients also reported significantly more symptoms than RA patients.
  • Matsura and colleagues (2003) evaluated 50 patients with scleroderma for factors associated with depressive symptoms using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck, 1967). Forty-six percent of the sample reported depressive symptoms ranging from mild to severe. Regression analyses revealed that high levels of hopelessness and low sense of coherence (coping ability and resilience in the face of stress) were the best predictors of depressive symptoms in this sample.
  • In ADs, the relationship between emotions, psychological distress, immune and neuroendocrine functioning, and disease manifestations are of particular interest.
  • There is considerable evidence to suggest that emotional states can produce alterations in the immune response. It is currently accepted that the brain and the immune system share bidirectional communication and exert important regulatory control over one another. The existence of such neural-immune interactions provides a pathway by which psychological processes can influence and be influenced by immune function (Maier, Watkins, & Fleshner, 1994). Additionally, immunological alterations have been reported across a wide range of psychiatric disorders (Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 2002a).
  • A growing body of evidence suggests a role for psychological distress in inducing, exacerbating, and affecting outcomes in SLE (Shapiro, 1997).

About the author

Ajit Kulkarni

Ajit Kulkarni

Dr. Ajit Kulkarni M.D.(Hom.)
International Teacher of Homoeopathy
Expert Guide towards many research projects of Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy, Government of India, New Delhi
Examiner and approved guide for post-graduate Studies in homeopathy, at many Universities in India
Guide for PG students in homeopathy, London School of Homeopathy
Hon. Emeritus Professor for Post–gr. (M.D.) courses in Homoeopathy, India
Author - “A Select Homoeopathic Matera Medica", “Law of Similars in Medical Science”, “Homoeopathic Posology”, “Kali Family and Its Relations”, “Body Language and Homoeopathy”, “More than 100 articles on various aspects of homeopathy”, “15 books in Russian language
Website: www.ajitkulkarni.com


  • One of the best articles…. I have a question… Is it possible for Dr. Ajit Kulkarni M.D to clarify on what you meant about the economy playing it’s role in AD? There is a line that seems like a typo and I am interested in hearing exactly what you mean on the role of economic status and AD. Here is the exact line that seems like there is some missing words or typos:

    “Hindrance in externalization à internalizationà telling upon the economy”

    Thank you and again loved this article.

Leave a Comment