Homeopathy Papers

The Study of Monogram: From Multitude to Access

homeopathic medicine for keloid

Dr. Ajit Kulkarni discusses the study of monogram, an approach to remedies through generalization, which reduces complexity by making a coherent whole.  A single construct of monogram unifies the scattered data, creating a roadmap for finding the simillimum.

Abstract: The concept of monogram was presented in ‘Absolute Homeopathic MM’, written by Dr. P.I. Tarkas and Dr. Ajit Kulkarni and published by B. Jain Publishers, New Delhi. Dr. Ajit Kulkarni deals with the evolution of materiamedica, keynotes, keythemes etc. and then explains the concept with philosophy, abstraction and generalization, correlation with data in MM and case illustrations and meaning of words coined for monogram.

Keywords: MM, evolution, limitation of symptoms, keynote symptoms, keynote themes, problems with keynote system, individual remedy and group study of MM through monogram.


Homeopathic Materia medicais the collection of the pathogenic effects of drugs and of the derangements they are capable of causing in the healthy body, by means of which the principle – ‘Let likes be treated by likes’ gets applied at the bedside.

Homoeopathic Materia medicaoriginated with Hahnemann who contributed a unique concept of ‘proving on healthy human beings’. Hahnemann collected the data from ‘provers’ and it was recorded ‘as it is’ as ‘Materia Medica Pura’. MM Pura of Hahnemann is a raw collection though basic; note that it will be a challenging job for modern homeopaths to practice if they keep the raw data of MM Pura before them. Then arrived the colossal work of the Encyclopedia of Allen. It contains the protean proving symptoms. Constantine Hering in his mammoth work of ‘Guiding Symptoms of our MM’ formulated proper headings and selected those symptoms which had been clinically confirmed. It was Hering who commenced the ‘mosaic’ of symptoms.


The evolution of homeopathic materiamedica (HMM) is an ongoing process and we have now many methods by which we can study our remedies. The beginning was the proving of exacting type where the provers – the human beings – expressed their honest experiences with the remedies that were given for the sake of knowing their effects at various levels of operation of human beings. The symptoms that were painstakingly gathered over months and years were collected together. The collection was pure but raw and there was a need to make it more refined, more understandable and more of applicable value. Clinical application of remedies has a big share in evolution. This is, in other words, ‘evidence based remedies’. And these remedies have enriched the value of MM.

If we see evolution of MM, every sincere stalwart has tried to make the tool of MM more powerful. There was need to make the scattered raw data streamlined in a disciplined way. There was need to make headings and subheadings to incorporate the symptoms in a relevant way. There was need to look at the toxicological data in terms of symptoms and pathology. There was need to focus light on the action of a remedy how it unfolds itself on the mental and physical states of the economy. The first evolution occurred in the study of symptoms. The symptoms in MM are variable, profound and needed to be integrated. The concept of totality will have a meaning provided we build up the matrix.

Different homoeopathic stalwarts have approached the study of the HMM from different perspectives. HERING, ALLEN, LIPPE, CLARKE, BOERICKE, KENT, TYLER, BOGER, DHAWALE, PULFORD, PATHAK, SCHOLTEN, COULTER, PHILIP BAILEY, VITHOULKAS, SANKARAN, P I TARKAS, AJIT KULKARNI etc. have contributed to the shaping of HMM in their own classical ways.

Anatomy, physiology and pathology were considered as pillars in interpretingdata by BOERICKE, CLARKE, BOGER and TARKAS-KULKARNI.

Handbook of Materia Medica and Therapeutics by T.F. ALLEN, in addition to the hard facts, referred to the clinical side of data and hence, T.F. ALLEN could be called as a pioneer in clinical co-relation.  PULFORD and ALLEN perceived the Keynotes from data which could individualize the portrait of a person or a disease.Kent’s artistic mind perceived meaning from the perspective of the personality of the drug amongst the data. His reference point was the philosophy of man and his sufferings and it was partly influenced by Swedenborg’s philosophy.Vithoulkasfocused on hard data and explained the essence of the personality of the remedies. Scholten dived deep into Periodic Table and expounded upon cation-anion relationships and developed the personality profiles.Dr. M. L. Dhawalerendered an integrated meaning to the data by taking the help of various basic sciences.(The readers are requested to read the preface of Absolute MM to apprise themselves of the contribution of stalwarts towards the development of MM).


  • “Now, as in a disease, from which no manifest exciting or maintaining cause (causa occasionalis) has to be removed, we can perceive nothing but the morbid symptoms; it must (regard being had to the possibility of a miasmand attention paid to the accessory circumstances, § 5) be the symptoms alone by which the disease demands and points to the remedy suited to relieve it – and, moreover, the totality of these its symptoms, of this outwardly reflected picture of the internal essence of the disease, that is, of the affection of the vital force, must be the principal, or the sole means, whereby the disease can make known what remedy it requires – the only thing that can determine the choice of the most appropriate remedy – and thus, in a word, the totality of the symptoms must be the principal, indeed the only thing the physician has to take note of in every case of disease”. – Samuel Hahnemann, Organon of the Medical Art, §7

Hahnemann, while underscoring the importance of the symptoms, has focused on the totality of the symptoms.  However, we have to look at the symptoms in many ways. It is to be noted that there are limitations to the symptoms.


  1. Symptoms may be unobservable, hidden or even absent

Symptoms are the sole representation of the disease and may always be present or correct. Symptom or symptoms may be a small part of a big disease portrait. Symptoms are always there, but we are the ones who cannot relate them to what we call a (certain) disease. The immune system performs its responsible job to throw off the warning signals in multiple ways.

Disease is a phenomenon. The law of existence denotes that nothing can’t ‘BE’ without cause and effect.It is rarely found in clinical practice that the disease is present but outward manifestations are absent. Remember, absolute nothingness is a certain type of existence. Even in absolute nothingness, intelligence exists.Hence, it is the duty of an intelligent physician to perceive the true nature of the symptoms.


  • Streptococcal infection without sore throat
  • Myocardial infarction without chest pain
  • “Silent” ischemia e.g. in DM due to neuropathy
  • Diabetes mellitus without polyuria or polydipsia
  • Duodenal ulcer without peptic symptoms
  • Viral hepatitis without jaundice
  • Atypical hyperplasia of the breasts (typically it doesn’t cause symptomsand diagnosis is made on mammogram or biopsy)
  1. Symptoms may be Atypical

We as clinicians hinge on typical presentations of common illnesses. Yet, what is often left out from medical training is the frequent occurrence of atypical presentations of illness. These presentations are termed “atypical” because they lack the usual signs and symptoms characterizing a particular condition or diagnosis. Sometimes the affected site may not reveal the pain or sensation or discomfort but it may have a different location.


  • Instead of anginal pain, the patient of ischemic heart disease may complain of indigestion.
  • Instead of pain in chest, the patient of myocardial infarction may complain of pain in the jaws.
  • Instead of epigastric pain, the patient of duodenal ulcer may present with excessive salivation.
  • A change in behavior or functional ability in an old age patient is often the only sign of a new, potentially serious illness.
  1. Symptoms may be Non-specific

These symptoms usually do not involve a specific organ or isolated body system. They do not indicate a specific disease or abnormality and it can be a feature of many clinical conditions. Several diseases can represent themselves through the common symptoms and it becomes a difficult task to make a proper diagnosis and may lead a physician astray.


  • Anorexia, nausea and vomiting remind of possible gastrointestinal and hepatic disease, but they may be the presenting features of chronic renal failure, hypercalcemia, digitalis toxicity etc.
  • Fatigue is a feature of many medical conditions which may be acute or chronic, physical or mental, primary or secondary. And if a person is fatigued at the end of a hard day or after exertion, it is normal.
  • Non-specific somatic symptoms may be clues to changes in emotional well-being.
  1. Identical symptoms

These may result from conditions which are diametrically opposite to each other and requiring entirely different management.


  • Both hypokalaemia and hyperkalaemia may manifest the same symptomatology, muscle weakness and the same physical signs, loss of tendon reflexes and loss of muscle contraction in response to direct percussion.
  • Their correct identification is aided by considering the circumstances in which the symptoms occurred: vomiting, diarrhea and diuretics would provide a setting for hypokalaemia; oliguria and anuria, crush injury and shock would provide one for hyperkalaemia.
  1. Some symptoms remain Unexplained

There are many symptoms which remain unexplained.


  • Some people have a readiness to explain everything. One must be wary about this attitude while interpreting symptoms and signs because it closes the door the further inquiry.
  • It is always good to record an unexplained symptom or an unexplained physical sign as “not understood” so that the mind is still open on the question – for future learning.


Hahnemann emphasized ‘individualization’ and naturally the study of MM got shifted to characteristic symptoms. The distinct difference between common disease symptoms and uncommon individual symptoms was being sought and PQRS symptoms became the influencing essentials. The widespread belief is disseminated that the study of MM means keynote symptoms and for successful practice, there is no alternative but to learn by heart the keynote symptoms of remedies. Thus, the keynote system became a universal and popular way of dealing with patients.

Problems with keynote symptoms

However, many issues crop up.

  • Keynote symptoms as given by many authors are different. There is no consensus in deciding the authenticity of keynote symptoms. H.C. Allen gives his set of keynotes (Keynotes and characteristics with comparisons of some of the leading remedies of the Materia medica)while Guernsey offers his own (Key-notes to the Materia medica) and he was the first to coin the word ‘keynote’ during 1868. WilliamBoericke renders his keynotes with emphasis on pathological symptoms. Adolph Von Lippe had penchant for his characteristics (Keynotes and Red line symptoms). During 1874, Dr. J. H. P. Frost wrote an essay over “On Characteristic Symptoms” in ‘Hahnemannian Monthly’. The quantity of keynote symptoms has been growing and if we make a collective work of amalgamating all keynote symptoms, it could be a big keynote MM.

Do we need it?

  • Selectivity due to favoritism. No logic in selection. Those that are ‘uncommon’, not connected to the disease symptoms,become keynote symptoms. There are ample uncommon symptoms in provings.
  • It is not possible to find keynote symptoms in all cases and at all times.
  • The PQRS symptoms may be within the domain of health and may not fall within the domain of a disease. ‘What is to be cured in a patient’ remains a pertinent question.
  • During Hahnemann’s time and later on too, the faculties like physiology, anatomy, pathology were not developed. In the light of the knowledge gained in these faculties, we are now in a better position to differentiate between common and uncommon. Even the field of concomitant symptoms need to be reviewed at large.
  • In many cases, the keynote symptoms and the pathology or the very process of the disease or the type of the personality doesn’t get covered by the remedy. Even though the keynote symptoms were regarded as the heart or soul of the remedies, the selection of them for the sake of a remedy amounts to one sidedness of the coverage of the data and then the follow-up becomes a non-disciplined affair.
  • Today’s keynote symptoms, if not helpful, as due to failure of the case, become redundant soon and on next follow-up, the job of a physician becomes to select another set of keynote symptoms. In short, the totality is brushed aside, not comprehended well and it becomes a repetitive act of chasing the keynote symptoms.
  • The study of personality type and the advancements in clinical psychology are not taken into account in the selection of keynote symptoms and it deprives the physician of right selection of a remedy and overall management.
  • Three questions are IMP:

(1)Is keynote system of prescribing a non-self-sufficient method and there are lacunae with it?

(2)Did it became popular just because it isa shortcut in clinical practice?

(3)Is the keynote system a ‘hit-and-miss’method?


Behind the disease there is a person and there are consistent characters that are unique to the person and they define the very individuality of the person. In spite of the changes that occur in life or in disease, these characters remain unchanged. Hence they must be a part of totality. In keynote symptoms, the main theme is to focus on symptoms. In keythemes, the focus is on the personality type, some consistent character that is inseparable from the system, some essence which is gleaned from the data, some central points in the data that define the case etc. etc.


  • Let us take the case of a boy. He is sensitive, delicate, born premature, is falling sick often and he can’t bear any criticism. He becomes nervous and tears soon start streaming from his eyes. He is affected easily when exposed to cold air or any stimulus of an unusual type brings on the deleterious effect.

By analyzing the data of the boy, we can draw the keytheme of being ‘fragile’.

  • Let us take another example. I was consulted for a case of a boy aged 15 years who has recurrent tonsillitis, rhinitis and dermatitis. They are ever present one after another and parents are exhausted as the boy is constantly ill and has to be given anti-inflammatory, antibiotics and steroids. The boy is rebellious, doesn’t want to follow the norms and quarrels with everyone and if his wishes are not fulfilled, takes everyone as enemy. He likes games of wars and is addicted to them and this has been a big problem as he may even skip school.Here, we get the key theme of body and mind at war. Through inflammation, he is fighting at the body level and there is enough evidence that the mind has the set-up of war. We can’t think of any remedy without the concept of war. There is a rubric which epitomizes his key theme“Mind; fight, wants to” and the IMP remedies here are , Aster.,Aur.,Carc.,Caust.,Hyos., Lac-eq., Lac-f.,Lac-leo.,Lach.,Lyss., Med., Merc.,Nux-v.,Scorp., Tub.andUran.
  • The extroverted or introverted types point towards the key themes that these personalitiesrepresent through their basic dispositions.
  • The study of a patient through temperamentfocusses on the basic traits.

Let it be clear that themes do not stand alone for themselves in prescribing. One theme (no matter how major) do not hold a case alone. It must be a part of the totality, along with the general symptoms-physical, mental and pathological and also the physical particulars.


Magnificence of data

  • The data in MM is multifaceted.
  • There are multiple hearts and nuclei of each remedy.
  • How to shape the data in a concrete whole?
  • How to connect a network of paths and hedges out of the puzzle through which a homeopath has to find a way?
  • How to make a meaningful portrait out of the maze of symptoms?
  • Which symptoms fall in the category of connections and which symptoms fall in their quality of being redundant?
  • The concept of monogram is developed out of the need of integration.
  • Without integration, the data will be just the quantity of components.
  • Integration renders quality to the data.
  • Integration defines the nature of components and opens up many new frontiers, new directions and new meanings hidden hitherto.

What is Monogram?

The word monogram is used in two contexts –

  • Design- In design we think of pattern, image, decoration, shape, ornamentation and logo.
  • Theme- Theme is related to idea, concept, topic or subject.

In homeopathy, both contexts are used with the concept of monogram.

The monogram is a remedy’s signature. It is like a piece of art for adorning the esteem of a remedy. It unifies the essential threads and renders the fabric of the remedy. The monogram is not just a word, it’s not an isolated state; it stands by association, resemblance, identification or convention. The monogram is the center from which we can enter into periphery and we can create the monogram by using the components of the periphery. Monogram is like the genetic encoding of a remedy where the information of characters of a remedy is programmed. It is like nucleus/essence/core/kernel/central idea which encompasses disturbances at mental, emotional and physical levels.

The study of a remedy through monogram is a more specific way to describe the general manner in which the symptoms express themselves. This is the mode where the procedure itself takes place. It bestows an impression, not just on impresser. It conveys precisely and concisely what a drug fundamentally is! It is like a genetic code of an individual that contains its unique information and will display its characteristic pattern in the form of behaviour!

Generalization is the process of identifying the symptoms of thetotality, as belonging to the whole. The symptoms, completely unrelated may be brought together as a group, belonging to the whole by establishing a common relation between them. Generalization is the formulation of general concepts from specific symptoms by abstracting common properties. Generalization is the essential basis of all valid deductive inferences. The study of monogram conforms to the concept of pathological general (Boger), but we have furthered the concept with pattern, pace and miasmatic activity. Thus, it helps to see mental, emotional and pathological layers in integration and how mind and pathology run parallel in a case. In other words, psycho-clinico-patho-miasmatic co-relations can be constructed and perceived well with the concept of monogram.

Monogram words are not merely pedantic rules. They are like building blocks. They incorporatebehaviour patterns, identifiable characteristics, habits, traits and trends, and prominent dispositions of person that are exhibited in a wide range of important psychological, clinical, pathological and miasmatic contexts.The study of monogram is a way to conceptualize and assess both stability and variability in behavioural patterns.Monogram study is the measurement of undercurrent between Mind and Body. It measures the degree to the recurrent and consistent patterns of ‘behaviour’ of certain physical and mental characters. The consistencies would be found in distinctive but stable patterns of “if-then” Context <——>Behaviour relationship that form the individual signatures.An individual can be analyzed using monogram to come up with the key indicators of how he/she tends to behave according to certain tendencies. While the keynote/key theme involves personal interpretation of subjective factors and as a result, can be influenced by the subjectivity of the physician, monogram projects the hard facts in an objective manner.



Insensible – Torpid –Adynamic  – Heavy Paralytic – Epileptic – Deep –

Tremulous-  Senile –  Dropsical –  Atonic –  Dry –  Sweaty –  Thrombotic

  1. Insensibility

Insensibility is the central feature of Opium.

Opium is one of the most complicated substances of our Materia medica. It contains about 18 alkaloids of which the Apomorphine, Morphine, Heroin and Codeine are well known. Besides mucilage, albumen, fat, sugar, and salts of ammonia, calcium and magnesia, it contains “17 or 18 alkaloids and two neutral substances, as well as meconic acid” (Brunton).

The poisonous effects of Opium are absolute unconsciousness, complete muscular relaxation, pupils contracted to a pin-point aperture, turgid, bloated, stertorous breathing, pulse slow, asphyxia and death. All these poisonous effects are due to the depressive action, which culminates asity. At the physical level the insensibility is expressed as loss of reflexes. The reactive pattern is depressed to such an extent that we do not get the response even to intense input. Hence, painlessness is the characteristic of Opium. The depressive action of Opium results in nerves ‘on end.’

The depressive action is available at both mind and body level in Opium pathogenesis with dynamic doses. At mind level we get higher intellectual faculties being depressed, self-control and power of concentration is lessened, judgement is progressively affected. This leads to poor perception, consequently confusion of mind and fanciful ideas. The senses are perverted including the moral sense, which is expressed at the dispositional level as a ‘knave’ person (unprincipled, crafty man, a rogue, a scoundrel), keeping insensibility to the feelings of others. Insensibility revokes the reality, the sufferings and goes to the extreme polarity of paradise. (It is interesting to note that, at different points in the body, we manufacture endorphins, natural opiates which intervene to calm fear, pain and cough, among other things). This state is characterized by a well- feeling even in grave conditions. A person is unable to understand or appreciate his sufferings. He loses the mental grasp of anything and says that nothing ails him. He wants nothing, he is placid and in his own dreamy state as if of “nirvana”.

It is interesting to note that Opium has indifference to both joy and suffering; this indifference is not associated with melancholy (like Natrums) but it is an ‘exalted’ state. It is similar to ‘AnhaloniumLevii’ but unlike it. Anhalonium has colourful, brilliant visions, beautiful and varied kaleidoscopic changes and a sensation of increased physical ability. These are however absent in Opium. It is similar also to Cann-i., which has fantastic visions; however, time sense is more disordered in Cann-i.

Opium has been reputed as a remedy for ‘deep unconsciousness’ where there is no response to superficial or deep reflexes. The unconsciousness may come on due to fright or head injury or even metabolic failure. During the convulsions the pupils are non-reacting to light. Want of susceptibility to remedy even though indicated is due to the insensibility that results in lack of reaction or adynamia. Here it must be competed with Carb-v, Psor, Zinc, Sulph, etc. Opium is, however, also acute in its manifestations.

  1. Torpid

The depressive action of Opium results in sluggishness both of mind and body.. The mind loses its perceptive filter capacity. The comprehension is affected, there is loss of will power and the person loses the go.At the physical level the torpidity is expressed as lack of vital reaction, insensibility of the nervous system, painlessness and soporous condition. Opium lessens the voluntary movements.This torpidity is exhibited at the level of various systems: sluggishness of the intestines; paralytic atony of bowels; obstipation; no desire to go to stool; senile. At urinary system there is feeble stream and slow to start. Loss of power or sensibility of bladder. Paralytic atony of bladder; retention of urine; after laparotomy or confinement. At the genital level there is suppressed menses especially from fright, also suppression of lochia. Uterine inertia with cessation of labour pains with coma is the characteristic feature.

Opium checks all secretions except that of skin. Torpidity results in general relaxation of the system expressed also at prolapse of uterus, ptosis and paralysis, hemias (more inguinal), hoarseness, slow pulse, heavy, stupid sleep and fever associated with sleepiness. In short, torpidity runs through and through and is manifested at mental and physical planes.

  1. Paralytic

The depressive action of Opium on the nervous system causes paresis and paralysis. Opium has paralysis of painless or painful type; of brain, tongue, bowels, bladder, larynx, limbs, etc.; from fright; from lead poisoning; head injury after; apoplexy; senile; alcoholic.In paralysis, Opium should be compared with Caust, Alum, Plb, Gels and Zinc.

  1. Adynamic

The torpidity, general depressive action of Opium results in the state of lack of vital reaction. This want of susceptibility gives a poor or no response to even well indicated remedies. Adynamia indicates the grave condition. The system has lost its power of resistance and the vitality needs to be aroused as a dire necessity. Opium is helpful in acute manifestations chiefly but it has the usefulness also in chronic ones. To illustrate if a patient has become unconscious due to CVS, thromboembolic phenomena, or septicemia, and he is not responding to the indicated remedies, Opium should be given to arouse the vitality of a person and then again the indicated remedy should be prescribed.

  1. Epileptic

The convulsions are the toxicological effects during the phase of stimulation. The causes are: after violent anger or rage; after fright; insult; puerperium; after cholera; from suppressed urine; when labour pains are ceased; apoplectic; brain diseases.The aura begins with congestive headache and convulsions are worse during and after deep sleep, glares of light, heat of room or bath, from approach of strangers (children). During convulsions – stertorous breathing; coldness of limbs; froth at mouth; eyes half open; pupils dilated and insensible to light; face dark red and hot. Throws limbs about or stretches arms at right angle to the body; stupor between spasms. The attacks are followed by relaxation of muscles and deep sleep.Opium can be tried in cases of mental retardation with epilepsy. Indolence, stupidity, rashness, recklessness and boldness characterize the Opium children. Such children are nervous, irritable and there is a tendency to start even at the least noise. These are the dreamy children who are deceptive in nature and are liars. Opium should be compared with Bufo, Tarent., and Tub. Opium should be tried in spastic children.

  1. Tremulous

Trembling characterizes Opium. Fright, anger or rage cause tremors. Twitching, jerking during sleep. Twitching of limbs; after fright. Jerks as if flexors are overacting. Shuffling and trembling gait. One or other arm moves convulsively to and fro. Trembling, twitching of facial muscles.Opium is one of the chief remedies for a patient who has developed trembling after fright.

  1. Dropsical

Opium poisoning has produced anasarca. Opium has oedema of lower limbs especially feet, and of lower eye lids. Oedema: uremia; diabetes mellitus; strokes; of face (red, bloated, swollen, dark suffused, hot).

  1. Dry

Internal dryness typifies Opium paresis and paralyses are the results of the dryness of the nerves. We get the dryness of mouth (with consequent intense thirst); of eyes (red, burning, hot and dry); of throat (with inability to swallow); of rectum (resulting in obstinate constipation with stools-dry, hard, round, black-balls); cough dry and racking; suppressed discharges (except sweat); dryness of emotions; indifference to pleasure and sufferings.

  1. Senile

The metabolic processes in old age are characterized by torpidity, low susceptibility and degeneration. Opium has all these characters in its pathogenesis. It has at the physical level senile vertigo with lightness of head; senile painless ulcers; slow circulation; tremors; various degenerative disorders of spinal cord; constipation; C.O.P.D.; occulo-motor paralysis; cardiac diseases; various digestive and kidney disorders; dryness of the mucous membranes and of the skin; nutrition impairment; etc.

  1. Atonic

The system under Opium develops ‘atony’ under its depressive and torpid action expressed at bowel and bladder in the form of constipation and retention of urine; prolapse of rectum, uterus; abortions; ptosis etc. The causes usually are fright, anger, insult etc. There is inhibition of reflexes. At mind level we get indifference, dullness. Want of susceptibility to remedies and insensibility are the furtherance of atonic state.

  1. Sweaty

All secretions are checked (except sweat) in Opium. This produces the internal dryness. The characteristics of sweat are: 1. Hot sweat over whole body except lower limbs. 2. Cold sweat over whole body (esp. on head and forehead). 4. Fever is > without perspiration. 5. Sweat without >. 6. Skin is usually hot, damp and sweating.

  1. Thrombotic

The reputation of Opium in unconscious, comatose state has brought to the fore the pathological condition of thromboembolic phenomenon. Under eyes we get ‘embolism of central artery’. Paralytic effects consequent to cerebral thrombosis come within the range of Opium.

  1. Heavy

The word ‘heaviness’ aptly describes the mental and physical characters. The mind is heavy, unable to comprehend. This leads to irresolution, confusion of mind; finally, we get idiocy of mind. Indifference to mind, dullness is also found in Opium. Torpidity at physical level explains heaviness at physical level.

  1. Deep

Opium is a deep-acting, polychrest remedy of wide range. Its toxic effects are devastating. Opium penetrates deep in the vital economy and causes a severe depressive action over the system. The ‘insensibility’ and ‘wants nothing’, ‘I am fine’, a ‘paradise’ state even with grave illness is actually indicative of deep magnitude of illness. One will naturally expect the warning signals through psycho-neuro-immunology in terms of pains through prostaglandin synthesis or of anxiety and conscientiousness through psychogenic defenses. But warning signals are absent and the system manifests the deceptiveness. This is reflective of syphilitic dominance.The study of Opium through above characters i.e. through monogram renders, in a nutshell, the essence of this important drug.

About the author

Ajit Kulkarni

Ajit Kulkarni

Dr. Ajit Kulkarni M.D. (Hom.) is a veteran homoeopath, an academician and a famed international teacher, known for his innovative ideas. Dr. Kulkarni has presented 70 international seminars around the world and more than 100 seminars in India. He is Director of the Homeopathic Research Institute, Pune, India. He is a prolific writer on homeopathy and his works include co-authoring Absolute Homeopathic Materia Medica, and authoring “Law of Similars in Medical Science”, “Homeopathic Posology”
“Kali Family and Its Relations”, Body Language and Homeopathy”, as well as 22 books in the Russian language. He received the Award of Excellence in Homoeopathy (2011), from the Post-Graduate Association of India, the ‘Homoeo-Ratna’ award (2014) from ‘Homoeo-Friends’, India, and the “Life Achievement Award”, (2018), from the Sontara Bhansali Charitable trust and Indian Homeopahic Forum.” Dr. Kulkarni has represented homeopathy on Bulgarian TV and gave an address at Kachare Classic, Erandwane, near New Karnataka High school, Pune. Visit him at his website: Website: www.ajitkulkarni.com E-mail ID: [email protected]

Leave a Comment