Jane, a 36 year old client, wants to get pregnant. She has not had a menstrual period for 18 months. That was when she stopped the oral contraceptives that she took for 15 years. For the last 3 years of it, she was taking Seasonale, an extended-cycle pill with menses once every 12 weeks. She feels frustrated and upset about her missing period, like a failure as a woman, has fears that her husband will leave her if she cannot have children. Her basal body temperature and cervical mucous do not indicate that she is ovulating, and she never gets a positive indicator of ovulation from the urine test strips she purchased. She has been evaluated by a fertility clinic with a finding of ovarian insufficiency. She cries about it often at night.
She reports that she also had no menstrual cycle for about 8 months in her teens when she was anorexic, and her body weight was under 100 lbs (5’8” normal frame). Her father had left the family when Jane was 15, and she felt everything was crazy at that time. The only thing she felt she could control was her eating, so she began to micro-manage her food. After several months, she had lost about a third of her body weight. She got mononucleosis and was in bed for several weeks. Her mother eventually got her into an eating disorder counseling program which helped. Within six months, she was back to normal eating and weight, and her menstrual cycle had resumed.
She was in a car accident a year and a half ago, with minor whiplash and a concussion. She had bad headaches daily for about 2 months after that: bruised ache feeling on the vertex, behind the eyes, and down the left temple where her head hit the window. The pain was worse from moving around, better from lying down. She had several sessions of craniosacral therapy and the headaches stopped for the most part. She still gets them once or twice a month, especially if she has not gotten enough sleep, same type of pain, and they last for several hours. She is having sharp needle like pain in her left shoulder joint when she raises her arm laterally, diagnostic evaluation indicates a bone spur. She has had problems with that shoulder in the past, with easy dislocations. She used to play sports, but had to stop after a very painful episode where her shoulder “popped out of joint” during a competition.
She fears flying and cockroaches in an extreme way – she does not travel in planes ever. She does not like direct sun on her face, because her eyes are very sensitive to light and they water a lot. She must have an open window at night to sleep, or she feels restless in bed. She had never been a deep sleeper. She has a recurrent dream of being in a rowboat on an ocean, looking over and seeing a big wave coming, and feeling fearful that it will overturn her boat. She always awakens before the wave hits the little boat.
She works long hours for a resort hotel as an event planner. Her average over the past 2 years was 65 hours/week. A little over a year ago, her job territory changed to include some parts of Asia. Since then her work hours are erratic, sometimes starting at 5 am, other times working until 2 am. She generally does not work more than 10 hours in a day, but her work covers all 24 clock hours on any given week. She often has at least one night per week with 4 hours of sleep. She enjoys her job, and feels a sense of satisfaction about what she does and the income she earns. She agrees it is stressful.
Her family history shows diabetes on her father’s side of the family. Both of her mother’s parents died of cancer in their 70s (lung, bowel).
After discussing symptoms and reviewing the lab reports she had brought in with her, I reflected on how I might best assist this woman. My approach now is quite different than it would have been early in my practice. This was a case that called for the wisdom of Eizayaga.
Eizayaga: Remarkable proponent of homeopathy
Francisco Eizayaga, Argentine physician and homeopath who began practicing in Buenos Aires in 1952, was a dynamic leader in the homeopathic profession. As a professor at the Asociacion Medica Homeopatica Argentina, he taught generations of homeopaths. As the founder of the Instituto Superior de Homeopatia Clinica de la Fundacion HOMEOS in Buenos Aires, he furthered the boundaries of homeopathic research while providing clinical training and serving diverse populations with much needed medical care. He served in leadership capacities with the Liga Medicorum Homeopathica Internationalis and the Argentine Medical Homeopathic Association (and many others), and provided the first Spanish version of Kent’s Repertory. He taught hundreds of seminars around the world. He passed away in 2001, and his homeopathic legacy continues through three of his children who became homeopaths.
During an era when homeopathy was at low ebb in the US, Eizayaga came to teach small groups of enthusiastic students here, beginning in the 1980s. One of my first homeopathic teachers, Lynn Amara, CCH, worked closely with him, documenting his therapeutic algorithms. She introduced all of her students to his analytical style in our classes. In 1993, I met Eizayaga when I attended a weekend seminar that he gave at Bastyr University. His case based focus and way of discussing disease was fascinating to me. Now with 20 years of clinical practice, I appreciate more than ever the way that Eizayaga has been profoundly influential in my understanding of case analysis.
Case Analysis: Not for the casual observer
Homeopaths follow Hahnemann’s direction in conducting a thorough interview, attempting to identify what is striking or characteristic about the client’s presentation, and then matching that to a remedy pattern. There is generally an expectation that the symptoms make up one whole cloth of the case, and that yields one constitutional remedy to address every symptom reported in the client’s state. This is a great theory, and currently holds the moral high ground in general understanding of clinical practice. Sometimes remarkable, life-changing results on every level come from this approach. Sometimes the client feels better in herself, but has no change in her chief physical complaint (or vice versa). Sometimes little or nothing happens, and then the practitioner’s conclusion is usually that the case was not correctly perceived and the remedy selection was inaccurate. Using this approach for the type of case noted at the beginning of this article has not been consistently successful for my clients. Based on my understanding of Eizayaga’s work, I conclude that he would have a different view of both the analytical process and the presumed cause in the unsuccessful outcome.
Eizayaga’s approach was more nuanced; he took into consideration the evolutionary states of disease. He taught that their varying stages of seriousness required different therapeutic criteria. He saw a difference between therapeutics for the affective state of the client and the symptoms of disease, between infectious disease and organic disease. He did not intermingle the symptoms of the client prior to the physical disease manifestation with those symptoms of the disease itself which appeared later. This allowed for the similia to be determined in several ways. He identified four primary aspects of each case, and each of these could present a therapeutic option. The following diagram illustrates his concepts.
NOTE: Eizayaga used the term ‘Constitutional’ to describe the physiology/genotype and the term ‘Fundamental’ to describe the overall state of the client within himself. In current parlance the overall state of the client is understood to be ‘Constitutional’, so in an effort to avoid the confusion that often arises for students encountering these terms, and with apologies to Dr. Eizayaga, I have transposed these two terms for the purpose of this diagram and discussion.
In this diagram, the four central boxes show Eizayaga’s concepts.
Fundamental: this represents the physiology such as the client’s ‘phosphoric’ long limbed appearance, or ‘flouric’ easy dislocations due to laxity of the ligaments. Eizayaga identified four genotypes: sulphuric, carbonic, phosphoric and flouric. He taught that this aspect of the case was important to prevent further disease through strengthening the organism.
Constitutional: this represents the disturbances of sensation, function, affect and experience of life that describe the client’s adaptation in life, and any change from ‘normal’, This is what we generally consider to be the constitutional remedy. However, Eizayaga only considered symptoms that affected the client generally, at the level of emotional affect, mental function, sensation and function in remedy selection.
Lesional: this represents the local organic tissue change in the end products of the disease process due to structural and microchemical changes in the cells. Examples include a nasal polyp, a bone spur, a calcified nodule in the breast, a dental abscess. He taught that this aspect of the case was addressed as a disease artifact. By that time the vital force has initiated a disturbance that has passed through the stages of disrupted sensation and function, into organic tissue change. By the time the organism has altered tissue, Eizayaga taught that therapeutics specifically addressing the lesional pathology were best defined by selecting only those symptoms of the local disease manifestation, or general symptoms that had altered since the appearnce of the lesional organic disease. These therapeutics were based on similia with the disease process, rather than the client totality. Eizayga excluded symptoms that were associated with the “patient who suffers from the illness”.